Paola Scifo1, Paola Mapelli1,2, Samuele Ghezzo2, Ana Maria Samanes Gajate1, Erik Preza1, Giorgio Brembilla2,3, Vito Cucchiara2,4, Naghia Ahmed5, Carolina Bezzi1,2, Annarita Savi1, Ilaria Neri1, Ettore Di Gaeta3, Luigi Gianolli1, Massimo Freschi5, Alberto Briganti2,4, Francesco De Cobelli2,3, and Maria Picchio1,2
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 2Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, 3Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 4Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 5Department of Pathology IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Synopsis
The use of PET/MRI scanners is an innovative
approach to stage prostate cancer (PCa) and the combined use of both 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 radiotracers can improve disease staging by
providing different metabolic aspects of the tumour. In the present study, 13 patients with high-risk PCa undergoing 68Ga-PSMA
and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI before radical prostatectomy have been included, with
availability of histology as gold standard to validate intraprostatic findings
and local extension. Our results suggest that the use of PET/MRI with a dual
tracer approach can improve PCa staging, by providing complementary information
ameliorating disease characterization.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer
in men worldwide1. While histological confirmation is required for the
diagnosis of PCa, multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI) is commonly implemented in the
clinical routine to detect the primary tumor, guide biopsies and define the
local extent of the disease2,3. PET molecular imaging is another valid imaging approach
in PCa staging, with new PET tracers bearing potential to improve diagnosis,
staging and follow-up of PCa4–6. Hybrid PET/MRI
allows the simultaneous acquisition of metabolic, structural, and functional
imaging information concerning PCa status in a whole-body single session
examination. The aim of
the present study is to investigate the synergic role of 68Ga-PSMA PET,
68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI in PCa staging using a hybrid PET/MR scanner.Methods
Thirteen patients
(mean age 66.74, sd 8.77) with biopsy-proven PCa underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and
68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in two different days for staging purpose. Radical prostatectomy was then
performed. The PSMA protocol consisted in a high statistic (HS) pelvic PSMA PET
bed, during which T2, DWI, DCE sequences were acquired and a Total Body PET
acquisition with LAVA-flex and DWI at each bed. The 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 protocol
consisted in a HS pelvic 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET bed during which T2 sequence was
acquired and Total Body PET acquisition with LAVA-flex. TNM classification
based on image findings was performed and quantitative imaging parameters were
collected for each scan. Specifically, on the pelvic HS PET beds, VOIs on the
tumor lesions were segmented on the 68Ga-PSMA PET, 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and on T2
MR images by an expert Nuclear Medicine physician and an expert radiologist.
After having coregistered PSMA and DOTA-RM2 studies, DICE score between VOIs was
computed. Furthermore, the histological data derived from prostatectomy were
used as gold standard to validate intraprostatic findings as well as local
extension of the disease. Results
Figure 1 shows
an example of study in a 53ys old patient.
The analysis of
semi-quantitative parameters of prostate uptake extracted from HS 68Ga-PSMA
images showed a mean SUVmax of 19.18 (sd: 10.920), SUVmean40-50-60% of 11.597,
12.885, 14.569, respectively (sd: 6.791, 7.587, 8.434, respectively), MTV40-50-60% of 1.613,
1.129, 0.712, respectively (sd: 0.910, 0.813, 0.707, respectively). The
analysis of semi-quantitative parameters of prostate uptake extracted from HS
68Ga-DOTA-RM2 images showed a mean SUVmax of 15.323 (sd: 7.827),
SUVmean40-50-60% of 9.745, 10.782, 11.54, respectively (sd: 5.204, 5.732, 6.003,
respectively), MTV40-50-60% of 2.899, 2.140, 1.664, respectively (sd: 1.697,1.436,1.289,
respectively).
Finally, ADCmean
and ADCmin was measured for each patient using the corresponding VOIs defined
on the T2 images. Mean ADCmean value of the primary tumors was 0.834 10-3
mm2/s (sd: 0.138), while mean ADCmin value was 0.516 10-3
mm2/s (sd: 0.152) and mean lesion volume was 1.713 cm3 (sd:
1.087). Figure 2 shows
the DICE indexes for each patients. Figure 3 shows two examples of concordant
and discordant contouring on DICE analysis.
All imaging
modalities detected the primary intraprostatic lesion, being concordant in
12/13 regarding the intraprostatic site of disease; in 1/13 patients 68Ga-PSMA PET identified the primary tumour in the
left side of the prostate, while 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI were concordant with
histology in identifying the primary tumour on the right lobe.
Regarding
seminal vescicle invasion (SVI), in 11/13 patients 68Ga-PSMA, 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET
and MRI did not detect any involvement, being concordant with histology; in
2/13, histology identified SVI not seen at imaging. The validation of
extracapsular extension (ECE) with histology has been performed only for MRI,
as both 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET are not suitable to identify ECE
because of their limited spatial resolution. Histology and MRI were concordant in
5/13 patients (2/13 positive and 3/13 negative for ECE) and discordant in 8/13
(5/13 with ECE at histology but not on MRI and 3/13 positive on MRI but not
confirmed at histology).Discussion and conclusions
These
preliminary results suggest the potential complementary role of 68Ga-PSMA PET,
68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI in PCa characterization during the staging phase. A
very innovative aspect of the present study relies on the use of PET/MRI scanner
for both 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2, differently from the few published
studies on this topic7,8. The multitracer approach offers the possibility to
identify different sites of disease, thus improving disease characterization
and therefore patients' management and follow-up.Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the
Italian Association for Cancer Research (grant IG 2017 Id. 20571) and by the
Italian Ministry of Health (PE-2016-02361273); EUDRACT number: 2018-001034-18.
Signa PET/MRI system (GEMS, Wakesha, Wisconsin, USA) used in the present work
has been purchased with funding from Italian Ministry of Health.References
1. Barsouk, A. et al. Epidemiology,
Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer. Med. Sci. 8, 28 (2020).
2. Johnson, L. M. et al.
Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11,
346–353 (2014).
3. de Rooij, M., Hamoen, E. H.
J., Witjes, J. A., Barentsz, J. O. & Rovers, M. M. Accuracy of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic
Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 70, 233–245 (2016).
4. Maurer, T., Eiber, M.,
Schwaiger, M. & Gschwend, J. E. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer
management. Nat. Rev. Urol. 13, 226–235 (2016).
5. Mapelli, P. & Picchio, M.
Initial prostate cancer diagnosis and disease staging - The role of
choline-PET-CT. Nat. Rev. Urol. 12, 510–518 (2015).
6. van Kalmthout, L. W. M. et al.
Prospective Validation of Gallium-68 Prostate Specific Membrane
Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary
Staging of Prostate Cancer. J. Urol. 203, 537–545 (2020).
7. Fassbender, T. F. et al.
Voxel-based comparison of [68Ga]Ga-RM2-PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT with
histopathology for diagnosis of primary prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 10,
(2020).
8. Schollhammer, R. et al.
68Ga-PSMA-617 Compared With 68Ga-RM2 and 18F-FCholine PET/CT for the Initial
Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 44, e535–e536 (2019).