Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is one of the most frequent valve diseases in the elderly with relevant prognostic impact. Becausesufficient experimental models were lacking, we recently refined a murine model of gradable experimental AS closely mimicking disease progression in humans. Here, we aimed at developing a comprehensive MRI approach for simultaneous assessment of changes in valvular, myocardial as well as aortic function in mice. We demonstrate that in this murine model high resolution MRI is capable to reliably display transvalvular aortic flow profiles with concomitant quantification of structural and functional changes inaortic valve, left ventricle, and ascending aorta.
1. Niepmann et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019; 108(8), 847-856.
2. Haberkorn SM et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10(8), pii: e006025.
Figure 1: Valvular structure and function
(A+B) Valve opening in short axis views at the atrio-ventricular level in early systole in sham control (left) and AS (right) mice. (C) Opening of the aortic valve in untreated controls (con), sham-operated (sham), and AS mice expressed as percentage of maximal valve orifice in early systole to total inner aortic area in diastole. (D) Long axis views of AS (bottom) and sham (top) mice in early diastole revealing structural remodelling of the valve in AS. (E) Quantification of aortic leaflet area (see Supplementary Figure 5); n=9 each, ***P<0.001.
Figure 2: Aortic flow profiles
(A+B) Anatomical reference (left) and 2D velocity maps (middle) for assessment of blood flow at the level of the opened valve in sham controls (top) and AS (bottom). Velocity flow profiles were measured over the vessel cross section and are displayed as 3D surface plots in early systole (right). Peak velocity was higher in AS (C) and occurred later after valve opening as shown for two representative time courses of AS and sham-operated animals (D). Arrows indicate valve orifice; n=9 each, ***P<0.001.
Figure 3: Aortic regurgitation combined with AS
Backward flow is reflected by black jets immediately after valve closure (arrows in (A+B+G)). Long (A) and short axis views at the mid ventricular (B) and valvular level (G) compared to the same view in systole (D). (E+H) Corresponding velocity maps to (D+G) show a slight dark backflow at the location of impaired valve opening (arrow in (H)). Negative backflow in combined AS+AR and an early rise due to pendular volume (C). Asymmetric 3D flow patterns over the stenotic valve in early systole (F) and diastolic backflow after valve flapping (I).
Figure 4: Aortic wall strain and morphology
(A+D) Aortic arch in end-diastole in sham controls and AS. (B) While sham mice exhibited a homogenous flow pattern in the ascending aorta in early systole, in AS turbulent flow occurred (black patchy flow artefacts) (E), which resulted in increased systolic distension (G) and enhanced circumferential strain in AS (H). (F+I) As a consequence, mice with AS displayed a thickening of the aortic wall (arrows) at the valvular level as compared to controls (C); n=9 each, *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Figure 5: Left ventricular structural and functional changes
(A+B) Global left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and cardiac output were unaltered in AS mice. (C) Regional analysis of cardiac function (see Supplementary Figure 2). For the sake of clarity, SDs are plotted in light grey and data of untreated controls were omitted; n=9 each. (D) Anatomical reference images demonstrated a significantly increased diastolic wall thickness in AS mice, which was accompanied by reduced myocardial T1 and T2 values as revealed by MR relaxometry (E+F); n=9 each, *P<0.05, **P<0.01.