Chang-Woo Ryu1, Xiao-Yi Guo2, HyeokJung Kwon2, Soonchan Park1, Hak Young Rhee3, A-Rang Cho4, and Geon-Ho Jahng1
1Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 4Psychiatry, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
To
assess the cerebral
microvascular alteration in the demented patients relative to a non-demented population
using in vivo microvascular index maps by using Gd-based contrast agent at a 3T MRI system, we included 11
non-demented participants and 11
AD patients. Compared
with the non-demented group, BVf and MvWI were significantly increased in the
demented group. Both mVD and VSI were only significantly decreased in the demented
group at the white matter hyperintensity (WMHI) area. BVf and MvWI were
significantly positively correlated with age and VSI was significantly
positively correlated with MMSE.
Background
Conventional MRI techniques do not demonstrate the
microvascular alterations in mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and
therefore, the diagnosis of microvascular pathology commonly relies on postmortem.
Mapping of transverse
relaxation rate differences between before and after
injection of a contrast agent, and was applied
to map the microvessel structures in the brain tumors (1), brain ischemic stroke (2),
AD (3), and vascular dementia (4). Except for our recently published paper which
was used in Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent (4), most of the previous studies were performed using
intravascular super-paramagnetic (SPION) contrast agents. Therefore, although
these relaxation rate differences as well as the microvascular indices can
provide useful quantitative metrics of in
vivo vascular morphology (5),
it should be beneficial to use a clinically approved contrast agent to directly
apply in clinics.Purpose
Despite its
potential in the assessment of microvascular pathology, to our knowledge,
microvascular imaging has not been addressed in the diagnosis of AD in humanity.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess
the cerebral microvascular alteration in the demented patients relative to a non-demented population
using in vivo microvascular index maps by using a Gd-based contrast agent at a 3T MRI system.Methods
Participants: Both 4 cognitively normal (CN) and 7 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) subjects were defined as the non-demented
group (non-demented) and 8 mild AD and 3 moderate AD patients were defined as the demented group (demented). Therefore, a total of 22
participants were included in this study.
MRI acquisition: MRI data were acquired using a 3T scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare,
The Netherlands) in all participants. to map
microvascular indices, a multi-echo (ME) turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence was
scanned to calculate the R2 relaxation rates before and after contrast injection.
Furthermore, a multi-echo gradient-echo (GRE) sequence was also run to
calculate the R2* relaxation rates before and after contrast injection.
Imaging
processing: The
voxel-based R2* relaxation rates before (preR2*) and after (postR2*) contrast
agent were calculated by fitting the exponential decay curves from multi-echo
GRE images. ΔR2 was calculated by using the signal ratio before and after
contrast injection obtained from multi-echo TSE images, which was proposed by
Tropres et. al (6). The microvascular indices were mapped as the vessel size index (VSI), mean
vessel diameter (mVD), microvascular
density (Q) (7), blood volume fraction (BVf)
(8), and microvessel-weighted imaging (MvWI) (9).
Statistical analyses: The
two-sample t-test was used to compare those values between the groups. The
correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between those
values and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score.Results
Compared with the non-demented group, BVf was
significantly increased in the demented group at parahippocampal gyrus
(p=0.033), gray matter area (p=0.008), and white matter area (p=0.010). MvWI
was also significantly increased in the demented group at hippocampus
(p=0.010), parahippocampal gyrus (p=0.010), presuneus (p=0.045), and globus
pallidus (p=0.008). Both mVD and VSI were only significantly decreased in the
demented group at the white matter
hyperintensity (WMHI) area (p= 0.045 with mVD; p= 0.033 with VSI).
BVf and MvWI
were significantly positively correlated with age at some areas. VSI was
significantly positively correlated with MMSE at caudate (rho= 0.475/ P=0.030)
and corpus callosum (rho= 0.435/ P=0.049).Conclusion
This
is the first study to evaluate the cerebral microvascular alterations in
Alzheimer's disease using the microvascular indices obtained with the relaxation
rate difference before and after injection of the Gd-based contrast agent at 3T
clinical MRI. We found that Q and MvWI increased in the
demented patients and VSI
in the caudate and corpus callosum positively correlated with the MMSE score, and BVf
in the WMHI area was significantly decreased in the demented
participants. We concluded that some microvascular indices may be used as an
imaging biomarker to evaluate the alteration of the brain microstructure in AD.
However, it is required to additional studies with a relatively large sample
size.Acknowledgements
The
research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the grant by the Korean
Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Education, Republic
of Korea [2016R1D1A1B03930720,
G.H.J.] and the grant funded
by the Ministry of Science, Republic of Korea
[2020R1A2C100474912, G.H.J.].References
1.Farrar, C.T., et al., Neuro Oncol 2010;12,
341-350. 2.Kang, M., et al., Sci Rep 2020;10, 4989. 3.Zerbi, V., et al., Brain
Struct Funct, 2013. 218(5): p. 1085-98. 4.Choi, H.-I., et al., Frontiers in
Neurology 2020; 11, 1302. 5.Dennie, J., et al., Magn Reson Med 1998; 40,
793-799. 6.Tropres, I., et al., Magn Reson Med 2015;73, 325-341. 7.Xu, X., et
al., Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12, 17224-17234. 8.Lemasson, B., et al., NMR Biomed
2011;24, 473-482. 9.Jung, H.S., et al., NMR Biomed 2016;29, 690-701.