Simone Poli1,2, Ahmed Fahiem Emara3, Edona Ballabani3, Angeline Buser3, Michele Schiavon4, David Herzig3, Chiara Dalla Man4, Luc Tappy3, Roland Kreis1,2, and Lia Bally3
1Magnetic Resonance Methodology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Translational Imaging Center, sitem-insel, Bern, Switzerland, 3Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism UDEM, Insel Hospital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 4Department of Information Engineering (DEI), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Synopsis
The liver
takes a central role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis by storing glucose
in the fed state and releasing it during food abstinence. As a consequence, the
liver is critically involved in glucose homeostasis disorders. We propose a novel non-invasive approach combining Deuterium Metabolic Imaging
(DMI) with 13C-MRS at 7 T to dynamically map hepatic glucose metabolism. Preliminary results support technical feasibility and provide first
insights into distinct hepatic glucose profiles in patients with dysregulated
glucose homeostasis. The proposed approach may open new avenues for a better
understanding of pathophysiology of glucose dysregulation and development of targeted treatments.
Introduction
The liver plays a vital
role in whole-body glucose (Glc) homeostasis. Hepatic Glc uptake and consequent
conversion into glycogen is an important determinant of postprandial Glc
control1. These processes are crucially influenced by Glc and insulin
exposure of the liver. Hence, altered Glc absorption kinetics and hepatic insulin exposure, which occurs in
patients with diabetes or who underwent bariatric surgery, are therefore likely
to impact hepatic Glc metabolism2,3. Thus, deciphering metabolic
processes in the liver may offer new avenues towards novel diagnostic and
therapeutic targets. For decades, 18FDG-PET
has been used to explore
tissue-specific Glc metabolism4-6. However, the method precludes insights into
metabolic processes beyond glucose uptake and its use for clinical research is
limited by risks related to radiation exposure.
Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI)7,8 and 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)9 are attractive
non-invasive MR techniques for dynamic in vivo mapping of deuterated Glc and
natural-abundance glycogen levels in the liver or skeletal muscle. DMI can be
performed with oral intake of [6,6’-2H2]-Glc, providing
greater convenience and more physiological conditions. The aim of our project is
to assess the trajectory of intrahepatic Glc and glycogen in patient
populations with altered insulin and glucose kinetics compared to matched
healthy controls. Here, we report on feasibility and initial results.Methods
Cross-sectional study design with three
groups, each eventually consisting of 10 participants (healthy adults (group-I),
adults with type-1 diabetes (T1D, group-II) and adults after gastric bypass
surgery (RYGB, group-III)). Here we report initial data for n=5 Group-I, n=2
Group-II, n=2 Group-III participants. For study procedures see Fig. 1. Blood was
assayed for plasma
concentrations of (enriched) glucose, insulin, glucagon and C-peptide to build
a kinetic model. T1D
received subcutaneous (s.c.) insulin to cover the Glc load and insulin
requirements during the scanning period.
The MR protocol considers different
physiological Glc absorption and glycogen generation kinetics; hence, 2H-MRSI
scans are more frequent until T50 and afterwards are equally interleaved with 13C-MRS.
MR was performed at 7T
(Terra, Siemens) using a triple-tuned 1H/2H/13C
surface coil (Rapid, Biomedical GmbH). MR parameters were chosen as trade-off between
signal-to-noise ratio optimum and time/spatial resolution and are described in
detail in another contribution. In short: DMI: conventional 3D-MRSI (TR 500
ms, nominal resolution
of 18.3x18.3x27.5 mm3, 4:08 min acquisition time). 13C-MRS: pulse-and-acquire sequence (TR 600
ms, Nuclear-Overhauser-enhancement, acquisition time 5:08 min). 22 time points for 2H-MRSI
and 15 for 13C-MRS.Results and Discussion
Participants'
characteristics (age, BMI, %female) were (34 ±12.7, 25.1 ±2.2, 67%) for
Group-1, (44 ±15.6, 26.9 ±3.5, 50%) for Group-II and (43 ±4.9, 34 ±11.1, 100%) for Group-III.
Fig. 2 illustrates data quality and
spectral changes for DMI for three representative subjects as a function of
time relative to Glc intake.
Fig. 3 shows the quantified evolution of D-glc with time
both in the liver from 2H-MRSI (quantified with the initial natural-abundance
water signal) and in peripheral blood, as well as the quantified hepatic
glycogen signal (a.u.) for 5 healthy subjects. The D-Glc signal is absent
before [6,6’-2H2]-Glc
intake (T0), appears soon after T0 and consistently increases to its maximum around
T45-T65. Later, D-Glc decreases towards baseline but remains well detectable until
T150. Blood Glc also increases after the load and remains elevated until about
T120. Glc entering the liver is either metabolized, released or stored in form
of glycogen, measured as overall content (unrelated to deuteration). Its signal
appears to increase linearly by ~10-15% for most subjects.
Fig. 4 includes individual data for two
participants each with T1D and RYGB contrasted to the average signal of group-I,
modelled as a polynomial function. Clearly, it is too early for conclusive
observations, but the metabolic trends confirm initial hypotheses. Compared to
healthy subjects, T1D patients appear to have a slower hepatic D-Glc increase and
reach a plateau only around T70-T100. Hepatic D-Glc never reaches the level of
healthy controls and glycogen levels seem to rather decrease over time. This may suggest that peripherally
delivered s.c. insulin cannot replicate physiologic postprandial hepatic
insulin exposure, thereby compromising early postprandial hepatic Glc uptake. The data for both RYBG patients show a
rapid increase in D-Glc, in line with their well-established accelerated
intestinal Glc absorption. For the one with complete data (one had to stop the
scan for nausea) the peak level was higher and reached earlier than for Group-I.
Also glycogen increased faster in line with the hypothesis that most of the
accumulated intestinal Glc is shifted into glycogen. This may indicate that the
re-arrangement of the gastrointestinal tract substantially alters the portal
milieu by accelerated Glc fluxes and consequently heightened early postprandial
hepatic insulin exposure.Conclusions
Intake of
60g [6,6’-2H2]-Glc resulted in gradual increase of intrahepatic
Glc, peaking at T45-T65.
This was paralleled by
an 10-15% increment in hepatic glycogen. In diseases with dysregulated
glucose-insulin homeostasis, liver glucose and glycogen signals portray the
respective altered Glc and insulin exposure of the liver. Compared to healthy
controls, RYGB subjects showed higher hepatic Glc and glycogen signals, in line
with the left shifted blood Glc and insulin profile. Conversely, subjects with
T1D applying s.c. insulin, hepatic Glc showed a flattened profile reflecting
attenuated hepatic Glc uptake as a consequence of lower hepatic insulin
exposure.Acknowledgements
This is project is supported by the
Swiss National Science Foundation (PCEGP3_186978) and Diabetes Center Bern. We
further acknowledge the support received from the study nurse team (Valérie Brägger, Joana Filipa Rodrigues Cunha Freitas,
Sandra Tenisch), Andreas Melmer and Laura Goetschi from the Department of
Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital, Bern
University Hospital. Simone Poli and Ahmed Emara have equal contribution to
this project. References
[1] Petersen MC,
Vatner DF, Shulman GI. Regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in health and
disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017; 13(10):572-587.
[2]
Pagliassotti
MJ, Holste LC, Moore MC, Neal DW, Cherrington AD. Comparison of the time
courses of insulin and the portal signal on hepatic glucose and glycogen
metabolism in the conscious dog. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97(1):81-91.
[3] Edgerton DS, Scott M, Farmer B, Williams PE,
Madsen P, Kjeldsen T, Brand CL, Fledelius C, Nishimura E, Cherrington AD.
Targeting insulin to the liver corrects defects in glucose metabolism caused by
peripheral insulin delivery. JCI Insight. 2019; 5(7):e126974.
[4]
Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical
evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983; 3(1):1-7.
[5] Iozzo P, Geisler F, Oikonen V, et al. Insulin
stimulates liver glucose uptake in humans: an 18F-FDG PET Study. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(5):682-689.
[6] Verloh N, Einspieler I, Utpatel K, et al. In vivo
confirmation of altered hepatic glucose metabolism in patients with liver
fibrosis/cirrhosis by. EJNMMI Res. 2018; 8(1):98.
[7] Lu M, Zhu XH, Zhang Y, Mateescu G, Chen W.
Quantitative assessment of brain glucose metabolic rates using in vivo deuterium
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017; 37(11):3518-3530.
[8] De Feyter HM, Behar KL, Corbin ZA, et al.
Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) for MRI-based 3D mapping of metabolism in
vivo. Sci Adv. 2018; 4(8):eaat7314.
[9] Valette
J, Tiret B, Boumezbeur F. Experimental strategies for in vivo13C
NMR spectroscopy. Anal Biochem. 2017; 529:216-228.
[10] Harris JA, Benedict FG.
A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918; 4(12):370-373.