Nicole I.C. Cappelletto1, Hany Soliman2, Casey Y. Lee1, Nadia D. Bragagnolo1,3, Arjun Sahgal2, Albert P. Chen4, Ruby Endre3, William J. Perks5, Nathan Ma5, Jay S. Detsky2, Chris Heyn6, and Charles H. Cunningham1,3
1Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4GE Healthcare, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Brain
metastases are increasingly being treated with stereotactic radiosurgery;
however, 20-30% of treated tumors recur locally post-treatment. Hyperpolarized
[1-13C]pyruvate magnetic resonance imaging (HP 13C MRI) is
an emerging metabolic imaging modality that measures key metabolic phenotypes indicative
of tumor biology. Here we investigate pre-treatment [1-13C]pyruvate
uptake – a potential marker of monocarboxylate transporter 1 expression and
tumor vascularity – via HP 13C MR images as a predictor of local
recurrence. [1-13C]pyruvate uptake establishes a robust predictive
model (AUC = 0.73) and, as a result, can inform treatment decisions should
the model predict a non-response to SRS.
Introduction
Brain metastases (BMs) occur in 20-40% of all cancer patients1–4 and are commonly treated with surgery,
stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination of the two.1,5 Although SRS has proven a highly effective
treatment, 20-30% of BMs recur locally.6 In such cases, an alternative radiation schedule
or surgery may have been more beneficial; however, current methods for response
assessment rely on detecting changes in tumor volume on follow-up 1H
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).7 Although promising, volumetric changes take several
weeks to months to occur. Functional imaging modalities, on the other hand, have
the potential to detect treatment response on a shorter timescale. Hyperpolarized
[1-13C]pyruvate MRI (HP 13C MRI) is an emerging metabolic
imaging modality that not only allows for a 104-fold increase in
signal of key metabolites in vivo,8,9 but also for the interrogation of key metabolic
branching points that 18F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography cannot. Recent literature has focused on pyruvate-to-lactate
conversion to investigate the extent of anaerobic respiration in tumors and to potentially be used as a marker for disease aggressiveness or response
to therapy.10–12 Additionally, our group has shown that pre-treatment
[1-13C]lactate production in patients with BMs is predictive of response to SRS (AUC =
0.77, p < 0.05).13 It has been shown, however, that the
lactate-to-pyruvate ratio measured by this method in vivo is rate-limited by monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1)
expression in the plasma membrane of cells.14,15 This motivates the work presented here, which explores the predictive power of [1-13C]pyruvate uptake as a potential read
out of MCT1 expression and tumor vascularity. MCT1 expression16–19 and vascularity20,21 are both upregulated in cancer, are indicators
of a highly aggressive phenotype, and can influence response to therapy. We
hypothesize that high tumor [1-13C]pyruvate signal on pre-treatment
HP [1-13C]pyruvate MRI can predict non-responders to SRS.Methods
Written informed
consent was obtained from n=11 BM patients (m=17 tumors) prior to study
participation under a protocol approved by the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board
and Health Canada. A 0.43 mL/kg dose of 250mM [1-13C]pyruvate was
prepared in a sterile fluid path and hyperpolarized in a GE SPINLab polarizer. Participants
were scanned using a GE MR750 3.0T MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) with their
head secured in the support of a standard 8-channel neurovascular receive array (Invivo Inc.). A custom 13C birdcage
coil was subsequently docked in place. [1-13C]pyruvate was intravenously injected
at 4mL/s, followed by a 25mL saline flush at 5mL/s. A 3D dual-echo
echo-planar imaging sequence was used to acquire time resolved volumetric [1-13C]pyruvate
images (5s temporal resolution; 1.5cm isotropic spatial resolution; 24x24x36cm3
field of view).22 Following 13C image acquisition, the 8-channel 1H
neurovascular array was used to acquire 1H T1-w, gadolinium
(Gd) enhanced T1-w, and T2-FLAIR images.
13C
image reconstruction was completed in MATLAB (MathWorks Inc., MA). Time resolved 13C
images were summed to compute the area under the curve (AUC) for [1-13C]pyruvate. Tumors
were contoured by a radiation oncologist on T1-w or T2-w images
if Gd enhanced T1-w images were not available. To obtain regional
pyruvate signal information, BrainParser and the LPBA40 brain atlas were used
to parcellate T1-w images of the brain into 56 anatomical regions.23 Finally, [1-13C]pyruvate
z-scores were calculated for each tumor and brain region (i=57 and 56, respectively) using:
$$z_i = \frac{x_i - \mu}{\sigma}$$
where zi
is the ith region’s z-score, xi is the ith
region’s mean pyruvate signal, and $$$\mu$$$ and $$$\sigma$$$ are the mean and standard deviation of i-1 regions.
Tumor response was determined according to the RANO-BM criteria.7Results and Discussion
Figure
1 shows the pyruvate z-score pattern across the 56 brain regions for each study
participant. This metric is consistent across individuals (Kendall’s W=0.76), which
forms the motivation for the use of z-scores. To assess the predictive power of
tumor pyruvate, z-scores were computed for each tumor and analyzed using receiver
operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis. Figure 2a shows the z-score for
each tumor separated by primary cancer type. The data were scaled between 0 and
1 and pooled together for ROC analysis, as a one-way ANOVA concluded at least
one statistically significant difference in pyruvate z-score distributions
between primary types (F(3,13)=4.56, p=0.0216)
(Figure 2b). Figure 3 shows the resulting ROC curve, with an area under the ROC
curve (AUC) of 0.73 and optimal threshold resulting in a true positive rate of 0.8
and false positive rate of 0.17. The statistical significance of this result
was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U Test,24 with $$$\alpha$$$ =0.05. The
ROC curve resulted in p=0.08.
While
[1-13C]pyruvate uptake has classically been used as a normalization
signal in the HP 13C MRI literature, for the first time the predictive
power of [1-13C]pyruvate uptake normalized to [1-13C]pyruvate
in brain parenchyma is explored. Although not as predictive as [1-13C]lactate,13 the higher signal of [1-13C]pyruvate can achieve higher spatial resolution and make imaging lesions smaller than 1cm possible. Future work will investigate the
combination of [1-13C]pyruvate and [1-13C]lactate data to
improve local recurrence predictions.Conclusions
The
initial experience in using HP [1-13C]pyruvate uptake in brain
metastases as a predictive marker for local recurrence is provided. ROC
analysis resulted in a robust predictive model, which could potentially
inform treatment decisions for tumors that are unlikely to respond to SRS.Acknowledgements
I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor, Dr. Charles Cunningham, for his continued valuable support, ideas, and enthusiasm throughout my graduate studies thus far. My sincere thanks also goes to Dr. Casey Lee, who's PhD thesis laid the ground work for the results presented here. This work would not be possible without Dr. Lee. Thank you to Dr. Hany Soliman for supporting this project and helping with participant recruitment. Finally, thank you to my lab mates, Brin Uthayakumar and Nadia Bragagnolo, who trained me and taught me so much about HP 13C MRI over the past year.References
1. Soliman
H, Das S, Larson DA, Sahgal A. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern
management of patients with brain metastases. Oncotarget.
2016;7(11):12318-12330. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7131
2. Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY. Epidemiology of
Brain Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14(1):48-54.
doi:10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y
3. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG,
Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE. Incidence Proportions of Brain Metastases in
Patients Diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer
Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14):2865-2872.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149
4. Tsukada Y, Fouad A, Pickren JW, Lane WW.
Central nervous system metastasis from breast carcinoma autopsy study. Cancer.
1983;52(12):2349-2354.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19831215)52:12<2349::AID-CNCR2820521231>3.0.CO;2-B
5. Tsao MN, Rades D, Wirth A, et al.
Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es):
An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract
Radiat Oncol. 2012;2(3):210-225. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2011.12.004
6. Chao ST, De Salles A, Hayashi M, et al.
Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Limited (1-4) Brain Metasteses:
Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice
Guideline. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(3):345-353. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx522
7. Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al.
Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO
group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):e270-e278.
doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70057-4
8. Wolber J, Ellner F, Fridlund B, et al.
Generating highly polarized nuclear spins in solution using dynamic nuclear
polarization. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect Accel Spectrometers Detect
Assoc Equip. 2004;526(1-2):173-181. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.171
9. Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram
A, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in
liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(18):10158-10163.
doi:10.1073/pnas.1733835100
10. Granlund KL, Tee SS, Vargas HA, et al.
Hyperpolarized MRI of Human Prostate Cancer Reveals Increased Lactate with
Tumor Grade Driven by Monocarboxylate Transporter 1. Cell Metab.
2020;31(1):105-114.e3. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.024
11. Albers MJ, Bok R, Chen AP, et al.
Hyperpolarized 13 C Lactate, Pyruvate, and Alanine: Noninvasive
Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading. Cancer Res.
2008;68(20):8607-8615. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0749
12. Nelson SJ, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, et
al. Metabolic Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Hyperpolarized
[1-13C]Pyruvate. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(198):198ra108-198ra108.
doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006070
13. Lee CY, Soliman H, Bragagnolo ND, et al.
Predicting response to radiotherapy of intracranial metastases with
hyperpolarized [Formula: see text]C MRI. J Neurooncol. Published online
March 19, 2021. doi:10.1007/s11060-021-03725-7
14. Rao Y, Gammon S, Zacharias NM, et al.
Hyperpolarized [1- 13 C]pyruvate-to-[1- 13 C]lactate
conversion is rate-limited by monocarboxylate transporter-1 in the plasma
membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(36):22378-22389.
doi:10.1073/pnas.2003537117
15. Harris T, Eliyahu G, Frydman L, Degani H.
Kinetics of Hyperpolarized 13C₁-Pyruvate Transport and Metabolism in
Living Human Breast Cancer Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2009;106(43):18131-18136.
16. Chen AP, Chu W, Gu YP, Cunnhingham CH.
Probing Early Tumor Response to Radiation Therapy Using Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
in MDA-MB-231 Xenografts. Monleon D, ed. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56551.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056551
17. Hong CS, Graham NA, Gu W, et al. MCT1
Modulates Cancer Cell Pyruvate Export and Growth of Tumors that Co-express MCT1
and MCT4. Cell Rep. 2016;14(7):1590-1601.
doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.057
18. Ambrosetti D, Dufies M, Dadone B, et al.
The two glycolytic markers GLUT1 and MCT1 correlate with tumor grade and
survival in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Singh PK, ed. PLOS ONE.
2018;13(2):e0193477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193477
19. Romero-Cordoba SL, Rodriguez-Cuevas S,
Bautista-Pina V, et al. Loss of function of miR-342-3p results in MCT1
over-expression and contributes to oncogenic metabolic reprogramming in triple
negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12252.
doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29708-9
20. Song CW, Cho LC, Yuan J, Dusenbery KE,
Griffin RJ, Levitt SH. Radiobiology of Stereotactic Body Radiation
Therapy/Stereotactic Radiosurgery and the Linear-Quadratic Model. Int J
Radiat Oncol. 2013;87(1):18-19. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.013
21. Park HJ, Griffin RJ, Hui S, Levitt SH,
Song CW. Radiation-Induced Vascular Damage in Tumors: Implications of Vascular
Damage in Ablative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (SBRT and SRS). Radiat Res.
2012;177(3):311-327. doi:10.1667/RR2773.1
22. Geraghty BJ, Lau JYC, Chen AP, Cunningham
CH. Dual-Echo EPI sequence for integrated distortion correction in 3D
time-resolved hyperpolarized 13C MRI. Magn Reson Med.
2018;79(2):643-653. doi:10.1002/mrm.26698
23. Shattuck DW, Mirza M, Adisetiyo V, et al.
Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage.
2008;39(3):1064-1080. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031
24. Grunkemeier GL, Jin R. Receiver operating
characteristic curve analysis of clinical risk models. Ann Thorac Surg.
2001;72(2):323-326. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02870-3