High-quality magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is clinically valuable to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the renal function and urinary tract in children without ionizing radiation. However, respiration-related patient motion remains a major challenge that impairs diagnostic image quality and hampers an accurate quantitative analysis. In this study, we adopt a novel high temporospatial resolution dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI technique based on 3D radial stack-of-stars gradient-echo sequence acquisition in combination with elliptical variable density k-space scheme for morphological and quantitative MRU and demonstrate its motion robustness in small children in free breathing without sedation.
1. Dickerson EC, et al. Pediatric MR Urography: Indica tions, Techniques, and Approach to Review. RadioGraphics 2015;35:1208.
2. Dillman JR, et al. MR urography in children and adolescents: techniques and clinical applications. Abdom Radiol 2016;41:1007.
3. FDA review results in new warning about using general anesthetics and sedation drugs in young children and pregnant women. Safety Announcement. US Food and Drug Administration, Drug Safety Communication. 2016.12.14.
4. Beck GM et al. High spatial and temporal free breathing T1 contrast enhanced imaging using a novel 4D variable density, elliptical centric radial stack-of-stars sharing approach. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2018;26;1000.
5. Wuelbern JH, et al. Dixon Imaging with Golden Angle Stack of Stars Acquisition. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2015;23:3648.
6. Hedderich DM, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Free-Breathing Contrast-Enhanced T1w MRI of the Liver using Pseudo Golden Angle Radial k-Space Sampling. RoFo 2018;190:601.
7. Peters D, et. al. Radial Undersampling that is Variable in kz. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med-ESMRMB 2007;15:0304.
8. Forman C, et al. Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts for free-breathing whole-heart coronary MRA by weighted iterative reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:1885.
9. Menini A, et al. Self-calibrated soft gating for respiratory resolved 3D+ time lung ZTE. Proc ISMRM-ESMRMB 2018, Paris, France.
10. Song HK and Dougherty L. k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for contrast manipulation in projection reconstruction MRI Magn Reson Med 2000;44:825.
11. Kabus S and Lorenz C. Fast elastic image registration. Proc Med Image Comput Computerassisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2010;13:81.
12. Zhang S, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and extracellular volume mapping with motion correction and co‑registration based on fast elastic image registration. MAGMA 2018;31:115.
13. Khrichenko D, et al. Functional analysis in MR urography - made simple. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:182.
14. Kurugol S, et al. Reliable estimation of kidney filtration rate with DCE-MRI using motion-robust high spatiotemporal resolution Radial VIBE. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2017;25:3289.
15. Kurugol S, et al. Prospective pediatric study comparing glomerular filtration rate estimates based on motion-robust dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and serum creatinine (eGFR) to 99mTc DTPA. Pediatr Radiol 2020;50:698.
Figure 1: Schematic overview of 4D free-breathing variable density radial stack-of-stars used in this study. (A) Sampling order of the pseudo-golden angle radial spokes in the kxy plane (left) and variable density with elliptical centric scheme (right) combined with keyhole in the k-space trajectory. (B) Simplified pulse sequence diagram of stack-of-stars. This allows for a more homogeneous distribution of the consecutively acquired radial k-space spokes within a defined Nyquist ellipsoid close in time.
Figure 2. MRU images acquired using 4D FB (top) in comparison to standard Cartesian (bottom). Top: Arterial and urographic phases of a 4-year-old patient using 4D FB. Image quality remains stable throughout the whole examination. Bottom: A age-matched patient with duplex kidney on the left side examined under general anesthesia with conventional Cartesian. Note the motion artefacts on the right image due to respiration.
Figure 3. 4D FB MRU with the maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) images of a 4-year-old patient. The image quality is excellent for all sequences despite free breathing and respiratory motion. The duplex kidney on the right side can be easily depicted.
Figure 4. MRU tissue enhancement curves for 4D FB (top and middle) and standard Cartesian (bottom). Whereas in 4D FB the enhancement curves are smooth due to minimized motion effect, in conventional Cartesian hopping curves are seen between minute 3 and 6 due to severe respiratory motions and different kidney positions in the examination volume after the initial apnoeic phase. Top: a 4-year-old patient. Middle: a 3-month patient. Bottom: the same age-matched patient as in Figure 2. Curves were generated by the CHOP tool.
FB = free-breathing; SoS = stack-of-stars; FOV = field of view; ACQ = acquired; REC = reconstructed; TR = repetition time; TE = echo time
Table 2: Split renal function of the studied patients. RTT of the left kidney in patient 2 could not be determined because the contrast media did not reach the proximal ureter due to obstruction. CTT: Calyceal transit time; RTT: Renal transit time; Volume: Renal parenchymal volume; vDRF: Volumetric split renal function; pDRF: Patlak split renal function; vpDRF: Volumetric and Patlak split renal function.