Michael Vaeggemose1,2, Rolf F. Schulte3, and Christoffer Laustsen2
1GE Healtcare, Broendby, Denmark, 2MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark, 3GE Healtcare, Munich, Germany
Synopsis
Sodium (23Na) MRI allows
non-invasive examinations of intra-organ sodium concentrations in vivo. B1
field corrections are important
determinants of the sodium signal level. However, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
in sodium MRI makes accurate B1 mapping in reasonable scan times challenging. The
aim of this study is to evaluate Bloch-Siegert off-resonance B1 field
correction of sodium images in thigh muscle, heart, kidney, and brain with the
use of MRI in healthy human subjects using a 3D FLORET readout trajectory.
Introduction
A challenge for quantitative sodium MRI is the varying transmit and
receive B1 fields of the commonly used transmit-receive 23Na surface
coils. Compensating for these varying signal levels requires knowledge of the
sensitivity profiles, which are according to reciprocity principle [1] the same for transmit and receive
at 33MHz. Transmit B1 can be mapped using the Bloch-Siegert off-resonance pulse
approach [2], which is reported to be faster,
more robust, and yields higher SNR as to the dual angle approach [3]. The aim of this study is to
evaluate Bloch-Siegert off-resonance B1 field correction of sodium images in
thigh muscle, heart, kidney, and brain with the use of MRI in healthy human
subjects using a 3D FLORET readout trajectory.Methods
MRI examinations were performed on a 3T MRI
scanner (750 MR, GE Healthcare), allowing proton (1H) MRI as well as
sodium (23Na) imaging. A commercial Helmholtz coil pair (PulseTeq)
was used for 23Na imaging. Scans were performed at the thigh muscle,
heart, kidneys, and brain on 5 healthy subjects. The subjects were scanned
twice for evaluation of repeatability with minimum two weeks apart. Sodium
phantoms were placed in the field-of-view (32 and 80 mmolL-1, 4%
agar) to determine total sodium concentration. The phantoms are placed in the
centre of the anterior part of the coil in all scans. Proton anatomical images
and B0 maps were acquired.The radio frequency pulses were calibrated (transmit
gain and centre frequency) to optimize the sodium imaging acquisition. B1
transmit field map was acquired using a Bloch-Siegert off-resonance approach [2] (+/- 2000 Hz) based on the Fermat
Looped, Orthogonally Encoded Trajectories (FLORET) technique [4]. Sodium images were acquired with a
3D-radial-density weighted MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) sequence following
the trajectory, as described by Nagel et al [5]. Scan parameters of the imaging protocol
is listed in Figure 1.
The effect of B1 field correction was
evaluated based on anatomical structure, repeatability, and signal homogeneity inside
certain organs. Repeatability was estimated from signal-to-noise ratios of high
concentration phantoms at initial and follow up scan. Accurate anatomical
structure was determined from proton images and homogeneity from standard
deviations of histogram probabilities. Multiple paired t-tests were performed
on repeatability measures and the standard deviations of histogram
probabilities form the original and corrected sodium images. The level of
significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni-Dunn
method.Results
Visual inspection of the B1 field corrected
images indicate an increase of sodium signal. Comparison of anatomy based on
the sodium and proton images supports the suggestion towards significant
benefits of B1 field correction. This is most pronounced in the brain images
(Figure 2, A). However, all anatomies seem to show more truthful structures.
This is expected as B1 field correction increases accordingly to distance
between coil elements and the region-of-interest (ROI). Blood has a high
natural abundance of sodium indicated in signal levels of the two cardiac
chambers (Figure 2, B), the bone marrow in the ribs (Figure 2, B & D), and
large vessels of the thigh muscle (Figure 2, C).
Sodium
phantom signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in each data set and compared
between initial and follow up scan to determine repeatability (Figure 3).
Results shows minor changes in SNR when compared to the original images on a
group level (Figure 3, C). Furthermore, variation is measured on subject level
in both original and corrected images (Figure 3, A+B). Evaluating the variation
in multiple paired t-tests with the Bonferroni-Dunn correction showed no
significant differences between initial and follow up scan (p < 0.0125).
Quantification
of image homogeneity from B1 corrections is determined with a
region-of-interest (ROI) at each anatomy (Figure 2). Figure 4 shows the analysis
process and difference of applying a histogram (Figure 4, C) as to a cross-sectional
line of total sodium concentration (TSC) (Figure 4, F).
The TSC values across
matrix row indices shown by the cross-sectional line is challenged when objects
with naturally accruing high TSC is crossed. The peak is most likely a blood
vessel which has a higher TCS compared to brain tissue makes this approach
challenging. Therefore, homogeneity of anatomies was determined from the
standard deviations of histogram probabilities (Figure 4, C).
The results indicate a lower variation in the
probability of all organs after Bonferroni-Dunn correction (p< 0.0125) this
was significant in the brain, heart blood and muscle (Figure 5). Conclusions
The results illustrate the great potential of
the Bloch-Siegert off-resonance based B1 field correction. This is seen in thigh
muscle, heart blood, kidney, and brain. The initial benefits were most
pronounced in brain. The complete quantitative 23Na imaging
protocol, including B1 field correction is acquired at 3T within 15min. This
supports the use of the fast B1 field mapping (2:07min) in the clinical
setting.Acknowledgements
The authors
would like to thank radiographer Tau Vendelboe for contributing to scanning of
the participating subjects.References
- D. I. Hoult and R. E. Richards, “The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment,” J. Magn. Reson., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 1976, doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(76)90233-X.
- L. I. Sacolick, F. Wiesinger, I. Hancu, and M. W. Vogel, “B1 mapping by Bloch-Siegert shift,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1315–1322, May 2010, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22357.
- S. P. Allen et al., “Phase-sensitive sodium B1 mapping,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1126–1131, 2011, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22700.
- J. G. Pipe, N. R. Zwart, E. A. Aboussouan, R. K. Robison, A. Devaraj, and K. O. Johnson, “A new design and rationale for 3D orthogonally oversampled k-space trajectories,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1303–1311, 2011, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22918.
- A. M. Nagel, F. B. Laun, M. A. Weber, C. Matthies, W. Semmler, and L. R. Schad, “Sodium MRI using a density-adapted 3D radial acquisition technique,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1565–1573, 2009, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22157.