Negin Yaghmaie1,2, Warda T. Syeda3,4, Yasmin Blunck1,2, Rebecca Glarin1,5, Daniel Staeb6, Kieran O'Brien6, Scott Kolbe7,8,9, and Leigh A. Johnston1,2
1Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 3Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 4Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 5Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, 6MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Pty Ltd, Australia, 7Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 8Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, 9Department of Medicine and Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
An eddy current correction algorithm is proposed
that exploits the spatially distributed nature of the receive coil array with
signal acquisition immediately preceding image readout in PGSE-EPI diffusion-weighted
imaging. The array coil phase for each diffusion gradient direction is expanded
using spherical harmonics to yield an estimate of the eddy current-induced
field shift in the FOV, and the resultant eddy current-induced pixel shift
maps. Distortion corrected diffusion-weighted images are subsequently produced using
the estimated pixel shift maps for each diffusion direction, with the method
demonstrated in phantom and in-vivo 7T experimental data.
Introduction
A significant source of artifact in diffusion-weighted
MRI (DWI) are the eddy currents generated by the long diffusion-sensitizing gradients
in the conducting surfaces of the scanner. As has been well characterized, the
induction of eddy currents causes deviation in the local magnetic field,
resulting in image shear, shift or contraction that can result in
misregistration in DWI datasets, causing diffusion index miscalculations1,
2. Eddy currents produce effects that vary across the image volumes, specific
to each gradient direction and magnitude1.
Dynamic field monitoring using field cameras has been implemented during Pulsed Gradient Spin- Echo (PGSE)-EPI acquisition, to measure the field evolution by monitoring the probe
sample’s accrued phase. The eddy current induced fields are estimated by
spherical harmonic expansion of the phase recorded by the field camera array, and
utilized in a higher order reconstruction to overcome the effects of
spatiotemporal field perturbations3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Although the use of field cameras has shown promising results in
quantifying dynamic field evolution and correcting eddy current induced distortion compared to the registration-based and predictive methods, NMR probes are not routinely accessible. In this work, we demonstrate that receive array
coils can operate analogously to field cameras, measuring the evolving field immediately before the EPI readout. The coils, distributed in space, measure
phase evolution from which eddy current induced field shifts can be estimated
for each applied diffusion gradient, with subsequent image distortion
correction. We demonstrate receive array coil-driven distortion correction in experimental PGSE-EPI phantom and in-vivo datasets.Methods
Theory: The signal received by the $$$v^{th}$$$ array coil is$$S_v(t)=\int{\rho(r)C_v(r)e^{j\phi(r,t)}},$$where $$$\rho(r)C_v(r)$$$ is the coil sensitivity-weighted magnetization.
The phase function, $$$\phi(r,t)$$$ can be expanded as$$\phi(r,t)=\sum_{l=1}^{N}{K_l(t)h_l(r)},$$where $$$h_l(r)$$$is the $$$l^{th}$$$of $$$N$$$ spherical harmonic bases and $$$k_l(t)$$$are the expansion coefficients4,
7.
Given measured array coil signals, the above equations are solved to jointly estimate the expansion
coefficients and the field evolution. The difference between the estimated
field evolution in a diffusion weighted image and the b0 image provides the eddy current
induced field shift due to the specific diffusion gradient.
Sequence design: A 2D-EPI unipolar
PGSE diffusion sequence was modified to include a 1.5ms ADC readout immediately
preceding the EPI readout (Figure 1). The extra readout was short enough to
have minimal effect on the minimum echo time achievable by the sequence, but
long enough to capture the phase evolution in the array coils.
Experimental data: A bottle phantom containing $$$Ni_2SO_4$$$ and a 24-year-old healthy volunteer were scanned on an investigational 7T whole-body MRI scanner (MAGNETOM 7T plus, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a
1Tx/32Rx head coil (Nova Medical Inc.) with the following parameters: FOV 220×220 mm, matrix size 128×128, TE/TR= 80/1000 ms, slice thickness 1.6 mm,
BW/Pixel = 1860 Hz, in 6 different diffusion gradient directions (b=1000 s/mm2,
δ=12.8 ms, and Δ=38.9 ms) and
one b0 image.
Distortion correction: For each diffusion direction, the data from the additional ADC readout was used to
solve Eq.(1)-(2) with 2nd-order 3D spherical harmonics5, 7
utilizing a BOBYQA7, 8 optimizer in MATLAB. The eddy current induced
field shift and the resultant pixel shift maps in the phase encoding direction
were generated. An interpolation algorithm was used to correct the diffusion weighted images.Results
Phantom experiment: The b0 image
and estimated pixel shift maps for three exemplar diffusion directions demonstrate
the effect of eddy currents (Figure 2), with the difference maps (Figure 2
bottom row) displaying the difference between the corrected diffusion-weighted
images and the original diffusion-weighted images. The pixel maps show that the
uncorrected images are prone to up to three voxels shift in the phase encoding
direction.
Figure 3
shows side-by-side images of a selected column of voxels for the b0 image and
the 6 diffusion-weighted images. The corrected images show clearly improved
alignment in the dataset.
in-vivo experiment: Figure 4 shows the original diffusion weighted images (top row), and the corrected images (second row), and the b0 image contour (red lines). The corrected images show improved alignment with the b0 image. The pixel shift maps are illustrated in the third row. The fourth row shows the difference images overlaid with pixel shift contours, which highlights the spatially-varying effects of eddy currents on diffusion weighted images.Discussion and Conclusion
An eddy current artifact reduction method based on additional
signal readout immediately preceding EPI readout, utilising the data from the spatially distributed coils in the receive array coil, has been proposed. The proposed method generates eddy current-induced
field shift maps using the signals from the array coil, akin to the sensitivity of the results
generated using field cameras, where pixel displacements of -3.3 to 3.3 mm were reported for unipolar PGSE-EPI6. Our results show successful proof-of-concept correction of geometric distortions in phantom and in-vivo experiments, using the readily available array coils and avoiding the cost of field
cameras. Future work includes application of the method to higher b-value datasets and demonstration of the impact of the distortion correction on derived diffusion metrics.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the facilities, the scientific and technical assistance of the Australian National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at the Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit of the University of Melbourne. The work is supported by a research collaboration agreement with Siemens Healthineers.References
1. Jezzard, Peter, et al. "Characterization of and correction
for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging." Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 39.5 (1998): 801-812.
2. Graham, Mark S.,
et al. "Realistic simulation of artefacts in diffusion MRI for validating
post-processing correction techniques." NeuroImage 125
(2016): 1079-1094.
3. De Zanche, Nicola, et al. "NMR probes for measuring
magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems." Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine 60.1 (2008): 176-186.
4. Barmet, Christoph, et al. "Spatiotemporal magnetic field
monitoring for MR." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 60.1
(2008): 187-197.
5. Wilm, Bertram J., et
al. "Diffusion MRI with concurrent magnetic field monitoring." Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 74.4 (2015): 925-933.
6.
Chan, Rachel W., et al. "Characterization and correction
of eddy-current artifacts in unipolar and bipolar diffusion sequences using
magnetic field monitoring." Journal of Magnetic Resonance 244
(2014): 74-84.
7. Wilm, Bertram J., et al. "Higher order reconstruction
for MRI in the presence of spatiotemporal field perturbations." Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 65.6 (2011): 1690-1701.
8. Powell, Michael JD. "The BOBYQA algorithm for bound
constrained optimization without derivatives." Cambridge NA Report
NA2009/06, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (2009): 26-46.
9. Wallace, Tess E., et al. "Head motion measurement and
correction using FID navigators." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81.1
(2019): 258-274.