Tigris S. Joseph1,2, Hanwen Liu2,3,4, Guojun Zhao4, Shannon H. Kolind1,2,4,5, Robert Carruthers4, Alice Schabas4, Ana-Luiza Sayao4, Virginia Devonshire4, Roger Tam5,6, G. R. Wayne Moore2,4,7, David K. B. Li4,5, Anthony Traboulsee4, Irene M. Vavasour2,5, and Cornelia Laule1,2,5,7
1Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Montreal Neurological Institute - Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Synopsis
Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion volume is commonly reported
but is not pathologically specific or strongly associated with MS disability.
Lesions are not necessarily demyelinated, which may be why lesion volume and
disability are not strongly correlated. MS lesion volume was compared to Myelin
Water Imaging (MWI) derived metrics related to myelin content (myelin water
fraction) and inflammation (geometric mean T2) in MS normal
appearing white matter and lesions. Weak correlations were observed between
lesion volume and MWF, highlighting that the amount of lesional tissue does not
reflect the degree of myelin damage within the brain.
Background
Multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on conventional MRI
are areas of damage characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axon
degeneration1. Lesion volume is a commonly reported measure in
research and clinical trials but is not pathologically specific or strongly
associated with MS disability2,3. This disassociation is likely
because lesions are not necessarily demyelinated4. Remyelination and
further damage changes lesion environments but may not change lesion volume on
conventional imaging. Yet, lesions and myelin damage are often synonymous in
literature.
Damage within and beyond lesions can be probed using MRI
metrics that are specific to myelin and inflammation. Myelin Water Imaging (MWI)
is an MRI technique that quantifies different water pools based on T2
decay time and produces T2 spectra specific to local environment
characteristics. Geometric Mean T2 (GMT2) of
the intra/extracellular pool (40-200ms) is thought to increase when more water
is present as a result of inflammation/edema5, as demonstrated by lesions
having a higher GMT2 than normal appearing white matter (NAWM)6.
Myelin Water Fraction (MWF) is the ratio of the short peak component (T2
< 40ms) to the whole T2 spectrum and has been demonstrated to
correlate with histology staining for myelin7. The conventional
analysis method for MWI data is a regularized non-negative least squares (NNLS)
algorithm with refocusing flip angle optimization8,9. Previous work
has shown that NNLS with strong χ2-regularization may still be
susceptible to noise10. Recently, a new machine learning approach
known as spectrum analysis for multiple exponentials via experimental condition
orientated simulation (SAME-ECOS) has been developed to solve for T2 decay
distributions using a supervised neural network11. SAME-ECOS was
shown to be more robust than NNLS in the presence of noise11. Objective
Using MWI, we investigated the common assumption that the
amount of lesional tissue is reflective of the degree of myelin damage. Specifically,
we assessed the correlations between lesion volume and (1) MWF (myelin content),
(2) GMT2 (inflammation) from NNLS and SAME-ECOS in NAWM and MS lesions.Methods
Data Collection: 122
MS participants (demographics in Figure 1) were scanned on a 3T MRI (Philips
Achieva). Sequences included MWI 48-echo Gradient and Spin Echo (TR/TE=1073/8ms,
resolution=1x1x2.5mm3)12, diffusion (99
directions, b values = 0–1500, TR/TE=4798/79ms, voxel size = 2×2×2mm3)13, 3DT1
(TR/TE=3000/3.5ms, TI=926ms, resolution=1x1x1mm3), and proton-density/T2-weighted
(TR/TE1/TE2=2900/8.42/80ms, resolution=1x1x3mm3). MS participants
were recruited from 2 studies using the same MRI protocol.
Analysis: Voxel-wise GMT2 of the intra/extracellular pool (spectrum
weighted mean 40ms< T2 < 200ms), and MWF maps (ratio of T2
< 40ms to whole spectrum) were made with NNLS8,9 and SAME-ECOS11.
All maps were registered to 3DT1 space. CSF masks were made using
thresholded diffusion b0 images. Lesion masks were segmented by an experienced
radiologist using seed points on the PD/T2 images14, then
registered to 3DT1. NAWM masks were made using FAST segmentation15
on 3DT1 images with lesion and CSF masks subtracted. Masks were
overlaid on registered NNLS and SAME-ECOS maps to obtain mean region of
interest (ROI) values in NAWM and lesions. Lesion volume was determined by the
number of voxels in the lesion masks. The cube root was taken of the voxel
number to maintain homoscedasticity. Pearson correlation coefficients compared
all ROI metric means with lesion volume in all participants and in each disease
phenotypes (significance was determined if p < 0.05).Results
Figure 2 demonstrates
representative MWF and GMT2 maps. Correlation plots between lesion
volume and the MWI metrics are displayed in Figures 3 and 4. Lesion
volume correlated weakly with lesion MWF (NNLS: R = -0.35, SAME-ECOS: R =
-0.36), and moderately with lesion GMT2 (NNLS: R = 0.59, SAME-ECOS:
R = 0.58). Lesion volume correlated weakly with NAWM MWF (NNLS: R= -0.37,
SAME-ECOS: R = -0.35), and NAWM GMT2 (NNLS: R = 0.41, SAME-ECOS: R =
0.33). Figure 5 shows Pearson correlation coefficients between MWI
metrics and lesion volume in different phenotypes.Discussion
Lesion volume was only weakly correlated with lesion MWF,
which highlights the non-specific nature of lesion hyperintensities and may
also include remyelination. Lesion volume was most strongly correlated with
lesion GMT2, which suggests that as lesions occupy more and more
space, water-associated pathology becomes more dominant. NNLS and SAME-ECOS
produced similar correlations with both metrics in lesions and NAWM.
Phenotype analysis found NAWM MWF weakly negatively
correlated with lesion volume in secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and relapsing
remitting MS (RRMS). Lesion MWF correlated moderately negatively with lesion
volume in SPMS but only weakly in RRMS, which could mean increased lesion volume
is associated with increased myelin damage in more progressive disease. Lesion
GMT2 moderately correlated with lesion volume in RRMS, primary
progressive MS (PPMS), and SPMS, which may be due to an increase in water
mobility with inflammation or damage.Conclusion
Weak correlations between MWF and lesion volume
suggest that lesion pathology is complex and that lesion volume should not be
equated with myelin loss. Lesion GMT2 most strongly correlated
with lesion volume, suggesting the larger the lesional burden, the more
water-associated pathology. Further histology studies are needed to determine
what GMT2 changes are reflecting in tissue.Acknowledgements
The collection of the data was funded by the MS Society of Canada
and F. Hoffman La Roche. TSJ was funded by an UBC MS Connect Summer Studentship
Award funded from the Christopher Foundation and an endMS Master’s Studentship
award from the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada. Thank you to the MRI
technologists at the UBC MRI Research Center, the neurologists and staff at the
UBC MS Clinic, as well as the study participants and their families. This work
was conducted on the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territories of Coast
Salish Peoples, including the territories of the xwməθkwəy̓əm (Musqueam),
Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), Stó:lō and Səl̓ílwətaʔ/Selilwitulh (Tsleil- Waututh)
Nations.References
1. Institute
of Medicine 2001. Multiple Sclerosis: Current Status and Strategies for the
Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/10031.
2. Mammi
S, Filippi M, Martinelli V, et al. Correlation between brain MRI lesion volume and
disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta
Neurologica Scandinavica. 1996;94(2):93-96. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb07036.x
3. Ammitzbøll C, Dyrby TB,
Lyksborg M, et al. Disability in progressive MS is associated with T2 lesion
changes. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2018;20:73-77.
doi:10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.010
4. Patani R, Balaratnam M,
Vora A, Reynolds R. Remyelination can be extensive in multiple sclerosis
despite a long disease course. Neuropathology and
Applied Neurobiology. 2007;33(3):277-287. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00805.x
5. Liu H, Ljungberg E,
Dvorak AV, et al. Myelin Water Fraction and Intra/Extracellular Water Geometric
Mean T2 Normative Atlases for the Cervical Spinal Cord from 3T MRI. Journal
of Neuroimaging. 2019;30(1):50-57. doi:10.1111/jon.12659
6. Laule C, Vavasour IM,
Kolind SH, et al. Long T2 water in multiple sclerosis: What else can we learn
from multi-echo T2 relaxation? Journal of Neurology.
2007;254(11):1579-1587. doi:10.1007/s00415-007-0595-7
7. Laule
C, Leung E, Li DKB, et al. Myelin water imaging in multiple sclerosis: quantitative
correlations with histopathology. Multiple Sclerosis
Journal.
2006;12(6):747-753. doi:10.1177/1352458506070928
8. Whittall KP, Mackay AL. Quantitative
interpretation of NMR relaxation data. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969).
1989;84(1):134-152. doi:10.1016/0022-2364(89)90011-5.
9. Prasloski T, Mädler B, Xiang Q-S, Mackay A, Jones C.
Applications of stimulated echo correction to multicomponent T2 analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2011;67(6):1803-1814. doi:10.1002/mrm.23157
10. Wiggermann V, Vavasour IM,
Kolind SH, Mackay AL, Helms G, Rauscher A. Non-negative least squares
computation for in vivo myelin mapping using simulated multi-echo spin-echo T2
decay data. NMR in Biomedicine. 2020. doi:10.1002/nbm.4277
11. Liu H, Joseph TS, Xiang Q-S,
et al. A data-driven T2
relaxation analysis approach for myelin water imaging: Spectrum analysis for
multiple exponentials via experimental condition oriented simulation
(SAME-ECOS). Magn Reason Med. 2021. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29000
12. Oshio K, Feinberg DA. GRASE (Gradient-and Spin-Echo) imaging:
A novel fast MRI technique. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 1991;20(2):344-349. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910200219
13. Wang Y, Wang Q, Haldar JP, et al. Quantification of increased
cellularity during inflammatory demyelination. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 12):3590-3601. doi:10.1093/brain/awr307
14. McAusland J, Tam RC,
Wong E, Riddehough A, Li DK. Optimizing the use of radiologist seed points for
improved multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(11).
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2055865.
15. Zhang, Y,
Brady, M, Smith, S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov
random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med
Imag, 20(1):45-57, 2001.