Children affected by hepatic encephalopathy (HE) suffer from irreversible cognitive damage, and thus exploring the developing brain during HE is of crucial interest. Histology in an adult rat model of HE suggested alterations in the cerebellar microstructure, but there is a need for in vivo probes of these changes. Combining diffusion MRS and diffusion MRI, we measured increased metabolites’ diffusivities, as well as an increased intra-neurite/axon water diffusivity in white and gray matter in the cerebellum of a young rat model of HE compared to control rats, suggesting an alteration of cell density and/or of neurite network complexity.
1. Braissant, O. et al. Longitudinal neurometabolic changes in the hippocampus of a rat model of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. J. Hepatol. 71, 505–515 (2019).
2. Sorensen, L. G. et al. Longitudinal Study of Cognitive and Academic Outcomes after Pediatric Liver Transplantation. The Journal of Pediatrics 165, 65-72.e2 (2014).
3. Simicic, D. et al. P: 33 In Vivo Longitudinal 1H MRS Study of Hippocampal, Cereberal and Striatal Metabolic Changes in the Adult Brain Using an Animal Model of Chronic Hepatic Encephalopathy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 114, S17 (2019).
4. Pierzchala, K. et al. P: 68 Brain Regional Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress in a Rat Model of Chronic Hepatic Encephalopathy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 114, S33–S36 (2019).
5. Ligneul, C., Palombo, M. & Valette, J. Metabolite diffusion up to very high b in the mouse brain in vivo: Revisiting the potential correlation between relaxation and diffusion properties. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 77, 1390–1398 (2017).
6. Simicic, D. et al. In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain 1H-MR spectra at 9.4T: Parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T2 relaxation times. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 86, 2384–2401 (2021).
7. Callaghan, P. T., Jolley, K. W. & Lelievre, J. Diffusion of water in the endosperm tissue of wheat grains as studied by pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. Biophys J 28, 133–141 (1979).
8. Ades-Aron, B. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the Diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE Removal pipeline. Neuroimage 183, 532–543 (2018).
9. Palombo, M. et al. SANDI: A compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 215, 116835 (2020).
10. Jespersen, S. N., Olesen, J. L., Hansen, B. & Shemesh, N. Diffusion time dependence of microstructural parameters in fixed spinal cord. Neuroimage 182, 329–342 (2018).
11. Jelescu, I. O. & Budde, M. D. Design and Validation of Diffusion MRI Models of White Matter. Frontiers in Physics 5, 61 (2017).
12. Rackaova, V., Braissant, O., Rougemont, A.-L., Cudalbu, C. & Mclin, V. Longitudinal osmotic and neurometabolic changes in young rats with chronic cholestatic liver disease. Scientific Reports 10, 7536 (2020).
13. Račkayová, V. et al. Late post-natal neurometabolic development in healthy male rats using 1 H and 31 P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurochem 157, 508–519 (2021).
14. Mosso, J. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the cerebellum of a rat model of hepatic encephalopathy at 14.1T. in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021).
Fig. 1 – Sequence parameters for the standard 1H MRS, the diffusion MRS and diffusion MRI acquisitions. Δ: diffusion time, δ: duration of diffusion gradients.
Fig. 2 – Models used for diffusion MRS and MRI data fitting. Dneurite,MRS: metabolites intra-neurite diffusivity, Dneurite,GM: water intra-neurite diffusivity in GM, fneurite,GM: neurite fraction in GM, fsoma: soma fraction in GM, Rsoma: soma radius in GM, De,GM: isotropic extracellular water diffusivity in GM, faxon,WM: neurite fraction in WM, Daxon,WM: water intra-neurite diffusivity in WM, De//or┴,WM: water extracellular diffusivity (// and perp. to axons) in WM.
Fig. 3 – Metabolites concentration in the cerebellum at week 4 and week 6 post-surgery for both groups (STEAM). A: voxel location. B: representative spectra at week 6. C: metabolites concentrations. Gln: glutamine, Glu: glutamate, Ins: myo-inositol, Tau: taurine, tCr: total creatine, tCho: total choline, tNAA: total N-acetylaspartate, Sum of osmolytes: Ins+Tau+tCr+tCho. A Student’s t-test (or a Welch’s t-test when non-equal variance was found) was performed for all metabolites at week 4 and 6 between groups (*: p<0.05, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).
Fig 4 – Diffusion MRS. A: voxel location. B: representative diffusion decays at week 6 for Ins and tCr. C: estimated diffusion parameters for all metabolites. Errors estimated using Monte Carlo, with the standard deviation around the mean decay at all b-values. ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient. A Student’s/Welch’s t-test was performed for all diffusion coefficients at week 4 and 6 between groups (*: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001), showing increased ADC/Dneurite,MRS for osmolytes (Ins, Tau, tCr) and neuronal metabolites (tNAA, Glu).
Fig. 5 – Diffusion MRI. B. Additive overlap of the 3 eigenvectors scaled by FA in two slices of the cerebellum of one rat. SANDI (A) and WMTI-Watson (C) parameter estimates. The GM and WM masks were automatically selected on the fneurite,GM map using an adaptative Gaussian threshold followed by a morphological erosion to limit the selection of contentious areas. A Student’s /Welch’s t-test was performed for all parameters between groups. No statistical differences can be observed, yet a trend of increased neurite/axon diffusivities in GM and WM.