This study interrogates human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) derived treatments (cells versus secretome) in a preclinical transient ischemic stroke model. Biochemical markers of tissue recovery measured longitudinally over 21 d via sodium chemical shift imaging and proton relaxation-enhanced MR spectroscopy demonstrated that the arterial injection of extracellular vesicles produced in vitro by hMSC improved outcomes over ischemic stroke, albeit not to the level of direct cellular implantation. For the first time, novel MRI-compatible labeling provided the initial visualization of biodistribution and estimated permanence of hMSC-derived extracellular vesicles in the ischemic brain.
All work has been conducted in accordance with the Florida State University Animal Care and Use Committee. This work was supported by the US NIH (F31-NS115490 awarded to S.H. and R01-NS102395 awarded to S.C.G.). The National High Magnetic Field Laboratory is funded by the US NSF (DMR-1644779) and the State of Florida.
1. Doeppner, T. R. et al. Extracellular Vesicles Improve Post-Stroke Neuroregeneration and Prevent Post-ischemic Immunosuppression. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 4, 1131–43 (2015).
2. Otero-Ortega, L. et al. Role of Exosomes as a Treatment and Potential Biomarker for Stroke. Translational Stroke Research 10, 241–249 (2019).
3. Yuan, X., Rosenberg, J. T., Liu, Y., Grant, S. C. & Ma, T. Aggregation Preconditioning Enhances Survival and Efficacy of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Stroke Treatment. Cytotherapy 21, 1033–1048 (2019).
4. Rider, M. A., Hurwitz, S. N. & Meckes, D. G. ExtraPEG: A Polyethylene Glycol-Based Method for Enrichment of Extracellular Vesicles. Sci. Rep. 6, 23978 (2016).
5. Longa, E. Z., Weinstein, P. R., Carlson, S. & Cummins, R. Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 20, 84–91 (1989).
6. Shemesh, N., Rosenberg, J.T., Dumez, J.N., Muniz, J.A., Grant, S.C., Frydman, L. Metabolic properties in stroked rats revealed by relaxation-enhanced magnetic resonance spectroscopy at ultrahigh fields. Nat. Commun. 5, (2014).
7. Govindaraju, V., Young, K. & Maudsley, A. A. Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed. 13, 129–153 (2000).
Figure 1. Schematic of novel USPIO EV labeling method. EV were harvested from hMSC media as described previously using polyethylene glycol (PEG) enrichment.4 An additional PEG enrichment step following EV sonication with label enabled purification of USPIO-labeled EV for in vivo administration.
Figure 2. Successful localization of EV in ischemic region. a) EV visualization in cerebral tissue immediately following MCAO and 1-d post-MCAO in the striatum (white circle) with minimal aggregation (arrows); and b) signal intensity histograms demonstrating substantial contrast within the ischemic lesion (green) compared to contralateral striatum (blue) on day 0, with complete clearance of USPIO contrast at the ischemic lesion by day 1.
Figure 3. Sodium demonstrates lesion recovery in hMSC and EV administered animals. Representative (a-c) T2W images 1-d and (d-f) 23Na CSI over the entire time course for animals administered EV, hMSC and saline, respectively. Bar graphs demonstrate g) ischemic lesion volume recovery, h) ischemic lesion 23Na signal and i) contralateral hemisphere 23Na signal. Statistical significance calculated using a mixed-model effects with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. Significance indicated by *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. All values presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 4. Energetics measured via 1H RE-MRS. a) Representative RE-MRS 1-d post-MCAO for all three groups. Lactate levels indicate return of energetics for hMSC and EV groups b) between hemispheres and c) longitudinally. Statistical significance calculated using a mixed-model effects with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. Significance is indicated by * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. All values presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 5. Functional recovery and weight change support MR findings. Bar graphs represent strength test for a) left and b) right forelimbs as well as c) change in weight over 21 d. Statistical significance calculated using a mixed-model effects with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. Significance is indicated by * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001. All values presented as mean ± SD.