Ludger Starke1,2, Paula Ramos Delgado1, Jason M. Millward1, Sabrina Klix1, Thoralf Niendorf1,3, and Sonia Waiczies1
1Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany, 2Digital Health Center, Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, Germany, 3Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), A Joint Cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Improving sensitivity has been the major challenge towards
realizing the promises of 19F-MRI. Here we combine a cryogenic
surface RF probe and compressed sensing to achieve high spatially resolved 19F-MRI
of neuroinflammation in a challenging longitudinal study. Inflammation in the
CNS was observed even in the absence of neurological symptoms and detailed signals
along the CNS vasculature are clearly resolved. Together with effective
longitudinal registration this allows an in-depth study of disease progression.
Introduction
Improving sensitivity has been the
major challenge towards realizing the promises of 19F-MRI in
preclinical investigations.1 We previously demonstrated that 19F-SNR
and acquisition time efficiency can be substantially improved with cryogenic
surface RF probes2 and by compressed sensing
(CS)3 in the characteristic low SNR conditions. Here we combine these developments to achieve
high spatially (0.3 mm 3D-isotropic) resolved 19F-MRI of
neuroinflammation in a challenging longitudinal study. The goal was to study the
progression of inflammatory cells labeled with 19F nanoparticles
(NPs) in greater detail in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis.Methods
EAE was induced in 4 female SJL/J mice.
Perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether rich nanoparticles were administered daily starting
on day 5 (D5) following EAE induction. In
vivo MR data was acquired on D10, D12 and D14. All animal experiments were
carried out in accordance with local animal welfare guidelines (LaGeSo).
MR measurements were performed on a 9.4 T animal scanner
using a two-channel cryogenic transceive surface RF probe2
and a linear volume RF resonator for 19F and 1H acquisitions,
respectively (all Bruker BioSpin).
A 3D-RARE sequence with random undersampling in both phase
encoding dimensions was developed in-house. The central 10% of k-space points
were included deterministically and undersampling patterns were sampled from
density p(kx, ky) ∝ max(1 - (kx2 + ky2)1/2, 0)3/2, where kx, ky ∈ [-1, 1]
(Fig. 1A). A center-out encoding order was used to ensure maximal SNR
efficiency and an isotropic point-spread-function in the phase encoding plane
(Fig. 1B).
3-fold undersampled 19F MR data was acquired
using the above sequence (TR=800ms, TE=5.1ms, ETL=20, FOV=(37.5×25×25)mm3, (120×80x80) image matrix and TA=68min). A noise scan was used to determine the raw data noise
level σ. Anatomical 1H
imaging was performed with a fully-sampled 3D-RARE sequence (TR=2200ms, TE=7.5ms, ETL=16, FOV=(37.5×25×25)mm3, (150×100x100) image matrix
and TA=24min).
19F data was reconstructed with CS for each
channel individually. We used the accelerated ADMM4 with equally weighted
isotropic total variation5 and image
l1-norm regularization. The optimal regularization
strength was determined via the discrepancy principle6 and channels were combined
with a sum-of-squares reconstruction. 19F reconstructions were
thresholded at 2σ and remaining features consisting of <3 connected signal
voxels were removed as outliers.7
Registration of
anatomical images from D12 and D14 was performed on those from D10 using
Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs).8 The transformation
registering the 1H data was then applied to warp the corresponding 19F
images into the same geometric space (Fig. 2).
Results
Significant inflammation was observed in the CNS of all mice
already 10 days following EAE induction even in the absence of neurological
symptoms (Fig. 3). In all four EAE mice a progressive growth of inflammatory
lesions was observed, yet changes were much more pronounced in M1 and M2 (Fig.
3).
Co-registration of the anatomical, and thereafter the 19F MR data
allowed direct comparison of detected inflammatory signals in different regions
of the brain. In M1, neuroinflammation is already present on D10 despite lacking
neurological symptoms, hotspots are found in meningeal of cerebrum and
cerebellum as well as in intracortical layers at the level of the corpus
callosum (Fig. 4). Inflammation distributed to the olfactory bulb and optic
nerve on consecutive days. (Fig. 4). A similar pathology was observed for M2,
albeit a slower progression of inflammation compared to the development of
neurological symptoms (Fig. 5). Despite data undersampling, highly detailed signals
along the CNS vasculature are clearly resolved. Mostly the inflammation grows
from lesions already detectable on D10, which subsequently increase in size and
intensity (Fig. 4/5). The colocalization of these inflammation hotspots
demonstrates the accuracy of registration between measurement days. While the
average signal intensity (SI) of signal voxels did not deviate strongly between
pre-registration and post-registration reconstruction (-3.9±3.4%), the change in the number of signal voxels was much
more pronounced (-27±9%).Discussion
We have shown that CS and a cryogenic surface RF probe can
be combined to achieve sensitive high-resolution imaging. The comparatively
short 19F MR acquisition time of ≈1h enables repeated measurement of
animals on consecutive days and thus a longitudinal study design despite a challenging
disease model. Compared
to our previous EAE studies, we can gain more insights into the pathology with
higher resolved 19F MRI.3,9 The resolved detail and effective workflow for co-registration over multiple days allows an in-depth study of disease progression.
A next step towards quantitative analysis of the generated
data must be segmentation into anatomical regions. Changes of the detected 19F
signal volume due to the registration can be circumvented by performing the quantitative
analysis on pre-registration images. Additional B1 inhomogeneity correction has
been shown to be feasible, and will be essential to estimate accurate 19F
concentrations.10Conclusion
The results reveal the progressive development of
inflammatory lesions and demonstrate the capability of 19F-MRI for
detailed investigations of inflammatory processes.
Leveraging recent developments in MR hardware and signal
processing expands the range of feasible 19F-MRI applications. This
will not only improve the preclinical study of neuroinflammation but can also enable
future clinical applications. Finally, these advances can help to make 19F-MRI
a reality for compounds which reach only very low concentrations, such as the
imaging of fluorinated drugs.11,12Acknowledgements
This work was supported by
funding from the Germany Research Council (DFG WA2804) and received funding in
part (T.N., J.M.) from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European
Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No
743077 (ThermalMR). We also thank the
MDC-Weizmann Helmholtz International Research School for Imaging and
Data Science from the NAno to the MESo (iNAMES).References
1. Faber
C, Schmid F. Pulse Sequence Considerations and Schemes in Fluorine Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (ed. Flögel, U. and Ahrens, E.) 1–28. In: Pan Stanford
Publishing; 2016.
2. Waiczies
S, Millward JM, Starke L, et al. Enhanced Fluorine-19 MRI Sensitivity using a
Cryogenic Radiofrequency Probe: Technical Developments and Ex Vivo
Demonstration in a Mouse Model of Neuroinflammation. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):9808.
3. Starke
L, Pohlmann A, Prinz C, Niendorf T, Waiczies S. Performance of compressed
sensing for fluorine-19 magnetic resonance imaging at low signal-to-noise ratio
conditions. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84(2):592-608.
4. Goldstein
T, O'Donoghue B, Setzer S, Baraniuk R. Fast alternating direction optimization
methods. SIAM J Imag Sci. 2014;7(3):1588-1623.
5. Rudin
LI, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal
algorithms. Physica D. 1992;60(1-4):259-268.
6. Vainikko
GM. The discrepancy principle for a class of regularization methods. USSR computational mathematics and
mathematical physics. 1982;22(3):1-19.
7. Starke
L, Niendorf T, Waiczies S. Data preparation protocol for low signal-to-noise
ratio fluorine-19 MRI. Preclinical MRI of
the Kidney. 2021:711.
8. Avants
BB, Tustison N, Song G. Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight j. 2009;2(365):1-35.
9. Waiczies
H, Lepore S, Drechsler S, et al. Visualizing brain inflammation with a
shingled-leg radio-frequency head probe for 19F/1H MRI. Scientific reports. 2013;3:1280.
10. Delgado
PR, Kuehne A, Periquito JS, et al. B1 inhomogeneity correction of RARE MRI with
transceive surface radiofrequency probes. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 2020;84(5):2684-2701.
11. Prinz
C, Starke L, Millward JM, et al. In vivo detection of teriflunomide-derived
fluorine signal during neuroinflammation using fluorine MR spectroscopy. Theranostics. 2021;11(6):2490.
12. Prinz C,
Starke L, Ramspoth T-F, et al. Pentafluorosulfanyl (SF5) as a Superior 19F
Magnetic Resonance Reporter Group: Signal Detection and Biological Activity of
Teriflunomide Derivatives. ACS sensors. 2021.