A free-breathing 3D radial multi-echo GRE acquisition for whole-liver fat-water separation and quantification was proposed, which integrated retrospective respiratory motion extraction with Pilot Tone and motion-compensated reconstruction with focused navigation. The proposed framework was tested in 10 healthy volunteers at 1.5T. Post-processing of the 8 reconstructed and denoised echoes with a graphcut algorithm provided fat-water separated images and fat fraction maps of isotropic resolution. Images and maps were compared to breath-held reference 3D and 2D Cartesian acquisitions for validation of the quality of both motion compensation and fat-water separation.
The authors acknowledge the use of the ISMRM Fat/Water Toolbox [12] for some of the results shown in this work.
The present study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number #PCEFP2_194296, #PZ00P3_167871), the Unil Bourse Pro-Femmes, the Emma Muschamp Foundation and the Swiss Heart Foundation.
[1] K.-N. Vu, G. Gilbert, M. Chalut, M. Chagnon, G. Chartrand, and A. Tang, ‘MRI-determined liver proton density fat fraction, with MRS validation: Comparison of regions of interest sampling methods in patients with type 2 diabetes’, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1090–1099, May 2016, doi: 10.1002/jmri.25083.
[2] C. A. Campo, D. Hernando, T. Schubert, C. A. Bookwalter, A. J. V. Pay, and S. B. Reeder, ‘Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver’, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 592–603, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17812.
[3] H. Yu, A. Shimakawa, C. A. McKenzie, E. Brodsky, J. H. Brittain, and S. B. Reeder, ‘Multiecho water-fat separation and simultaneous R2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1122–1134, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1002/mrm.21737.
[4] S. B. Reeder, H. H. Hu, and C. B. Sirlin, ‘Proton density fat-fraction: A standardized mr-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration’, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1011–1014, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1002/jmri.23741.
[5] S. Meisamy et al., ‘Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis with T1-independent, T2*-corrected MR Imaging with Spectral Modeling of Fat: Blinded Comparison with MR Spectroscopy’, Radiology, vol. 258, no. 3, pp. 767–775, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100708.
[6] C. W. Roy et al., ‘Motion compensated whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using focused navigation (fNAV)’, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 33, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00717-4.
[7] T. Vahle et al., ‘Respiratory Motion Detection and Correction for MR Using the Pilot Tone: Applications for MR and Simultaneous PET/MR Exams’, Invest Radiol, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 153–159, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000619.
[8] D. Piccini, A. Littmann, S. Nielles-Vallespin, and M. O. Zenge, ‘Spiral phyllotaxis: The natural way to construct a 3D radial trajectory in MRI: Spiral Phyllotaxis Radial 3D Trajectory’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1049–1056, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22898.
[9] M. B. L. Falcão et al., ‘Pilot tone navigation for respiratory and cardiac motion-resolved free-running 5D flow MRI’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. n/a, no. n/a, doi: 10.1002/mrm.29023.
[10] A. Bustin, G. Lima da Cruz, O. Jaubert, K. Lopez, R. M. Botnar, and C. Prieto, ‘High-dimensionality undersampled patch-based reconstruction (HD-PROST) for accelerated multi-contrast MRI’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 3705–3719, 2019, doi: 10.1002/mrm.27694.
[11] D. Hernando, P. Kellman, J. P. Haldar, and Z.-P. Liang, ‘Robust water/fat separation in the presence of large field inhomogeneities using a graph cut algorithm’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, p. NA-NA, 2009, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22177.
[12] H.
H. Hu et al., ‘ISMRM workshop on fat–water separation: Insights,
applications and progress in MRI’, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol.
68, no. 2, pp. 378–388, 2012, doi: 10.1002/mrm.24369.
Table 1 - Acquisition parameters
The prototype free-breathing 3D radial ME-GRE sequence was acquired continuously with a phyllotaxis trajectory made of 424 interleaves composed of 22 segments each with a golden-angle rotation in between interleaves, leading to a 02:57min scan time. Parameters of the 3D Cartesian ME-GRE sequence were selected to match that of the proposed radial sequence as closely as possible, under the constraint of a breath-hold duration of 20sec. The 2p-Dixon sequence parameters were fixed as provided by the manufacturer.
Figure 1 – Motion compensation with fNAV in 2 healthy volunteers
The respiratory signal extracted from the Pilot Tone is shown on panel A. The source images of the first collected echo with the proposed sequence are shown B. reconstructed without motion compensation, C. reconstructed with fNAV and D. reconstructed with fNAV and denoised. Visible blurring in the superior-inferior direction at the lung-liver interface affects the uncompensated images, which is corrected by fNAV (red arrows). Denoising improved overall image sharpness and quality.
Figure 2 – Separated fat and water images in healthy volunteer 3 (M, 28yo)
Water-only (top) and fat-only (bottom) images are obtained from fitting the ME-GRE data to a 6-peak liver fat model, in the case of the 3D radial and 3D Cartesian (left and middle columns). The 2D 2-point Dixon VIBE acquisition (right column) produces separated images directly at the scanner and provides a gold-standard for fat-water separation. Good agreement and no swaps were observed, although contrast differences between 3D radial and 3D Cartesian can be seen (abdominal aorta).
Figure 3 – Fat fraction maps in 2 healthy volunteers
A. Healthy volunteer 4 (top) and 5 (bottom). The regions of interest (ROI) used for quantitative analysis are indicated by white circles. The labels indicated on the bottom-left map are respectively: 1. Segment VII, 2. Segment IV and 3. Segment II.
B. Mean and standard deviation of the fat fraction (in %) measured across the ROI in the volumes presented in panel A, for both imaging protocols.
Figure 4 – Bland-Altman plot: difference between 3D radial FB and 3D Cartesian BH in 10 healthy volunteers
The 3D Cartesian ME-GRE with NTE=8 echoes analysed with graphcut provided FF maps that were compared to those obtained with the proposed 3D radial framework. A low bias is reported, with small limits of agreements between the 2 imaging protocols, mostly driven by bigger deviations observed in 2 volunteers out of 10. Difference in slice thickness (1.5 vs 5.0mm) could explain these deviations.