Hyuk Jin Yun1, Hyun Ju Lee2, Joo Young Lee2, Tomo Tarui3, Caitlin K. Rollins1, Cynthia M. Ortinau4, Henry A. Feldman1, P. Ellen Grant1, and Kiho Im1
1Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States, 4Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
Synopsis
Sulcal emergence
is important to assess normality of early fetal brain development. Thus, we proposed a
quantitative approach to build an accurate timetable
of sulcal emergence. Using
a large sample of fetuses, we
automatically extracted cortical surfaces and detected presence and absences of
each sulcus. By fitting a logistic
curve to sulcal presence/absence,
the
timing and inter-subject variability of sulcal emergence were
estimated. We also found hemispheric
asymmetry and sex difference in the timing
and variability of sulcal emergence. Our quantitative timetable
concurs with previous reports but provides more precise information and
allow statistical comparison.
Introduction
In
the fetal brain, the timing of sulcal
emergence has been considered a key marker for evaluating the normality of
cortical development in numerous studies1–5. Sulcal emergence shows regionally different patterns that may be
related to dynamic spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression6–9. Since gene expression patterns are different across typical individuals, sulcal emergence may also have inter-subject
variability. The timing and inter-subject variability of sulcal emergence in typically
developing (TD) fetuses can provide crucial
information to define normal range of fetal brain development and can be used
as a reference to detect potential abnormalities in early brain development.
We aimed to quantitatively measure the
timing of sulcal emergence and its inter-subject variability. We also provided
a statistical approach to compare difference in timing and its variability
between groups. Here, we statistically investigated hemispheric asymmetry and sex difference in the timing and variability
of sulcal emergence.Methods
A total of 89 TD fetuses were
included in this study (gestational weeks [GW]: 26.6 ± 3.6 [mean ± standard
deviation (SD)], sex: 47/40/2 [male/female/unknown]). We used our automatic
pipeline for fetal brain MRI processing and cortical surface reconstruction10. Fetal sulci in the
cortical surfaces were anatomically assigned to 19 labels using spatial and
temporal information of fetal gyrification from multiple fetal templates from 23 to 33GW10. The fetal sulcal labels and
abbreviations are shown in Figure 1.
To estimate the timing and
variability of sulcal emergence, the presence or absence of sulcal labels in
each fetus was counted as binary variables. In each sulcus, we modeled a binary
logistic curve to quantify the relationship between GW and the binary variables
that represents the probability of sulcal label presence by GW. We estimated
sulcal emergence timing using GW at 0.5 of probability in the curve (t50).
We also calculated interquartile range (IQR) of GWs between probability at 0.25
(t25) and 0.75 (t75) as the inter-subject variability of sulcal emergence (Figure 2A).
To analyze hemispheric asymmetry and sex difference in the timing of sulcal
emergence, we statistically compared two logistic curves modeled in each
hemisphere (Figure 2B). Standard error (SE) of t50 in a group
(hemisphere or sex) were calculated and the statistical difference in the timings
were calculated by z transformation of t50s and SEs.
Comparison of inter-subject variability was also performed by substituting t50 for IQR.Results
Table
1 shows the timing and variability of sulcal emergence. Emergence of the STS
and CS occurred first as early as 23.67 and 24.10 GWs, respectively. The bilateral
SFS, IFS, PreCS, PostCS, IPS, and OrbS emerged between 24.9 and 27 GWs. The bilateral
MFS and OTS emerged after 27 GW. The inter-subject variability of sulcal emergence
were variant across sulci. IQRs of left CS and PreCS were less than 1 week.
Extremely small IQR were also found in the left IPS and right SFS. In contrast,
the bilateral OTS, left IFS, right Post CS, right IFS, right ITS, right SPS had
large IQR over two weeks. Since the SF, ColS, CingS, CalS, and POS emerge
before 22 GW in all fetal brains, their binary logistic curves were not
modeled, and we exclude them in the analysis.
Statistically
significant earlier sulcal emergence timing in the right hemisphere was found
in the CS (p = 0.042) and OTS (p
= 0.010) (Table 1). Significantly
smaller variability in the left hemisphere was found in the PostCS (p = 0.045). For sex difference (Table 2), the sulcal emergence timing of
males was significantly earlier than that of females in the left PreCS (p
< 0.001), left MFS (p = 0.023), left IFS (p = 0.005), and
right ITS (p = 0.040). Significantly larger variability of sulcal emergence timing in male fetuses was found in the bilateral
IPS (p = 0.003 [left] and 0.013 [right]).Discussion
This study is the first to quantify
sulcal emergence in a large sample of TD fetuses. The sequence of emergence
timing estimated by our quantitative approach indicates that the sulcal
emergence occurred from central to peripheral regions. This finding concurs
with the prior studies1,2,11–13 and may be related the
temporo-parieto-occipital pattern of brain maturation. The majority of sulci showed 1-2 weeks
of inter-subject variability of sulcal emergence timing, which is supported by previous studies with visual inspection1,2. While the visual inspection
studies reported uniform variabilities across sulci, our quantitative approach
found the regionally diverse variability that may be associated with different temporal
variability of gene expression in each region.
Furthermore,
we found left CS and OTS emerged earlier than right, which is supported by
previous studies on hemispheric asymmetry of brain structures14–17. Sex difference in emergence
timing and its variability reported in this study may be associated with sex
difference in regional volumes in the fetal brain17.
In
conclusion, our approach provided a quantitative timetable of sulcal emergence
that could be a reference to assess normality of fetal gyrification, and to
allow further statistical analysis of fetal gyrification. Future studies will
include enrichment for numerous factors that need to be explored including race,
ethnicity, socioeconomic status and maternal education.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Chi,
J. G., Dooling, E. C. & Gilles, F. H. Gyral development of the human brain.
Ann. Neurol. 1, 86–93 (1977).
2. Garel, C. et al. Fetal cerebral cortex: normal
gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. AJNR Am. J.
Neuroradiol. 22, 184–189 (2001).
3. Nishikuni, K. & Ribas, G. C. Study of fetal and
postnatal morphological development of the brain sulci: Laboratory
investigation. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 11, 1–11 (2013).
4. Levine, D. & Barnes, P. D. Cortical Maturation in
Normal and Abnormal Fetuses as Assessed with Prenatal MR Imaging. Radiology
210, 751–758 (1999).
5. Batchelor, P. G. et al. Measures of folding
applied to the development of the human fetal brain. IEEE Trans. Med.
Imaging 21, 953–965 (2002).
6. Bystron, I., Blakemore, C. & Rakic, P. Development
of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited. Nat. Rev.
Neurosci. 9, 110–122 (2008).
7. Kang, H. J. et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome
of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489 (2011).
8. Miller, J. A. et al. Transcriptional landscape of
the prenatal human brain. Nature 508, 199–206 (2014).
9. Pletikos, M. et al. Temporal Specification and
Bilaterality of Human Neocortical Topographic Gene Expression. Neuron 81,
321–332 (2014).
10. Yun, H. J. et al. Automatic
labeling of cortical sulci for the human fetal brain based on spatio-temporal
information of gyrification. NeuroImage 188, 473–482 (2019).
11. Habas, P. A. et al. Early
folding patterns and asymmetries of the normal human brain detected from in
utero MRI. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N 1991 22, 13–25 (2012).
12. Yun, H. J. et al. Temporal
Patterns of Emergence and Spatial Distribution of Sulcal Pits During Fetal
Life. Cereb. Cortex 30, 4257–4268 (2020).
13. Clouchoux, C. et al.
Quantitative in vivo MRI measurement of cortical development in the fetus. Brain
Struct. Funct. 217, 127–139 (2012).
14. Ratnarajah, N. et al.
Structural connectivity asymmetry in the neonatal brain. NeuroImage 75,
187–194 (2013).
15. Cykowski, M. D. et al. The
central sulcus: an observer-independent characterization of sulcal landmarks
and depth asymmetry. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N 1991 18, 1999–2009
(2008).
16. Zilles, K. et al. Quantitative
analysis of sulci in the human cerebral cortex: Development, regional
heterogeneity, gender difference, asymmetry, intersubject variability and
cortical architecture. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5, 218–221 (1997).
17. Vasung, L. et al. Quantitative
In vivo MRI Assessment of Structural Asymmetries and Sexual Dimorphism of
Transient Fetal Compartments in the Human Brain. Cereb. Cortex (2020)
doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz200.