Grant S Roberts1, Anthony Peret2, Leonardo Rivera-Rivera1,3, Karly A Cody3, Howard A Rowley2, Oliver Wieben1,2, Sterling C Johnson3, Kevin M Johnson1,2, and Laura B Eisenmenger2
1Dept of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Dept of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 3Dept of Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
It has been shown that vascular
disease is strongly associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). It is thus important to establish normative
cerebrovascular hemodynamics in aging populations. In this study, we
comprehensively assess macrovascular hemodynamics using 4D flow MRI to obtain
flow rates and pulsatility indices in 110 cognitively healthy, older adults and
correlate these measures with age, sex, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
(ASCVD) risk scores, and APOE genotypes. We found a (1) negative correlation
between flow vs. age and flow vs. ASCVD, (2) a positive correlation between pulsatility
vs. age and pulsatility vs. ASCVD, and (3) no correlations with APOE genotypes.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s
disease (AD) is currently the sixth leading cause of death whose prevalence
continues to grow due to demographic shifts and lack of treatments1. Recent evidence indicates that vascular pathology
is a major risk factor for AD-related dementia with several studies indicating
that it not only contributes to cognitive decline but also to neuronal loss in
AD-related Aβ and tau pathologies2-5. Thus,
there is considerable interest in defining cerebrovascular biomarkers for
prodromal and advanced AD. 4D flow MRI enables a comprehensive assessment of
intracranial hemodynamics in a single, whole-brain acquisition. While several 4D
flow studies have investigated vascular dysfunction in AD6-9, normal 4D
flow hemodynamic data in healthy older subjects is lacking. The primary aim of
this study is to evaluate normative hemodynamic measures (specifically flow and
pulsatility) in a large cohort of cognitively normal subjects using 4D flow MRI
and to establish correlations with age, sex, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
(ASCVD) risk score10,
and APOE genotype.Methods
In this preliminary study, a
sub-cohort of 110 subjects (73F/37M; mean age=67y; age range=[46-81y]) were
selected from a larger cohort of older, cognitively normal subjects from the
Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Inclusion criteria were defined
as a normal cognitive status via comprehensive clinical diagnosis11
and a Pittsburgh Compound B index < 1.1912,13.
Demographics, ASCVD risk scores, and APOE genotypes were obtained.
4D flow MRI data were acquired at
3T (Signa Premier, GE Healthcare, WI) using a radially-undersampled PCVIPR14,15
acquisition with the following parameters: TR/TE=7.7/2.5ms; flip=8°;
projections=11,000; isotropic resolution=0.69mm; image volume=22x22x10cm3;
VENC=80cm/s; scan time=5.6 min; encode scheme=4-point. The data was
reconstructed into 20 cardiac frames using retrospective peripheral pulse
oximeter gating and temporal radial view sharing16.
An interactive, semi-automated 4D flow processing tool (Figure 1A-B, available
on Github) was developed in Matlab2020b (Mathworks, Natick, MA), which included
automated vessel segmentation17,
centerline detection, and reporting functions for a robust and user-independent
analysis. Mean volumetric flow rates and pulsatility indices (PIs) were
obtained in 15 major vessel segments: cervical internal carotid arteries (ICA),
cavernous ICAs, vertebral arteries (VA), basilar artery (BA), middle cerebral
arteries (MCA), posterior cerebral arteries (PCA), straight sinus (StrS),
superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and transverse sinuses (TS). Total cerebral
blood flow was computed as the sum of the cervical ICAs and BA. For bilateral
vessels, left and right segments were averaged. Two observers separately
analyzed 55 cases each, using standardized vessel measurement locations (Figure
1C).
After 4D flow hemodynamic data
had been collected, two simple linear regression models were used to (1) assess
correlations between each outcome variable (flow and PI in each vessel) and age
as well as (2) each outcome variable and ASCVD score. Multiple linear
regression was then used to assess correlations between each outcome variable
with age, sex, and age-sex interactions. Scatter plots were obtained for each
regression model. Results
All 110 subjects were
successfully processed, with analysis taking approximately 9 minutes for each
case. Box plots for blood flow for all measured vessel segments (and total
cerebral blood flow) are shown in Figure 2. Simple linear regression revealed that
age is a predictor of decreased flow and increased PI in most vessel segments (Figure
3). For instance, age was positively correlated with flow (p = 0.001) and negatively
correlated with PI (p < 0.001) in the cavernous ICA. In the multiple
regression analysis, age showed the same relationship with flow and PI, but sex
and the interaction between age and sex did not correlate significantly with
flow or PI. ASCVD score was also found to be a predictor of decreased blood
flow and increased PI for most vessel segments (Figure 3-4). Finally, flow and
PI were not significantly correlated with APOE genotype.Discussion
It was observed that individual vessel
flow rates and total cerebral blood flow decline with age (consistent with
formerly published studies18-20),
and that pulsatility increases with age. However, it should be noted that there
may be low statistical power due to the limited sample size used in this study.
Furthermore, blood flow values align well with those reported in other MRI21 and ultrasound22 studies. While APOE genotypes
have been found to differentially alter cerebral blood flow using other MRI
methods23,
this was not observed in our study. We plan to continue analyzing normal
subjects, providing a robust hemodynamic baseline. This is not only useful for future
studies evaluating vascular dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment and AD but any cerebrovascular-related study interested in normal flow and pulsatility
values. Conclusion
This preliminary investigation
represents a first step towards defining normal cerebral blood flow and
pulsatility values utilizing 4D flow MRI, which provides a sensitive,
comprehensive and non-invasive tool for the assessment of cerebral luminal
blood flow and pulsatility. Normal flow
and pulsatility value, as have been reported in this study, show correlations
with age and vascular risk scores and are an important first step in defining
normative cerebral hemodynamics. Future studies will evaluate correlations with
other vascular measures, such as white matter hyperintensities, as well as
further improve 4D flow post-processing times. Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge
research support from GE Healthcare and funding support from the National
Institutes of Health (F31-AG071183, KL2-TR002374,
R01-AG027161). References
1. Alzheimer's A. 2016
Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2016;12(4):459-509.
2. Stampfer MJ.
Cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer's disease: common links. J Intern Med
2006;260(3):211-223.
3. Zlokovic BV.
Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and other
disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2011;12(12):723-738.
4. Corriveau RA, Bosetti
F, Emr M, et al. The Science of Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment
and Dementia (VCID): A Framework for Advancing Research Priorities in the
Cerebrovascular Biology of Cognitive Decline. Cell Mol Neurobiol
2016;36(2):281-288.
5. de la Torre J. The
Vascular Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease: A Key to Preclinical Prediction of
Dementia Using Neuroimaging. J Alzheimers Dis 2018;63(1):35-52.
6. Rivera-Rivera LA,
Schubert T, Turski P, et al. Changes in intracranial venous blood flow and
pulsatility in Alzheimer's disease: A 4D flow MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow
Metab 2017;37(6):2149-2158.
7. Rivera-Rivera LA,
Turski P, Johnson KM, et al. 4D flow MRI for intracranial hemodynamics
assessment in Alzheimer's disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
2016;36(10):1718-1730.
8. Clark LR, Berman SE,
Rivera-Rivera LA, et al. Macrovascular and microvascular cerebral blood flow in
adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2017;7:48-55.
9. Xu G, Rowley HA, Wu G,
et al. Reliability and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling
perfusion MRI on 3.0 T and comparison with 15O-water PET in elderly subjects at
risk for Alzheimer's disease. NMR Biomed 2010;23(3):286-293.
10. Goff DC, Jr.,
Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of
cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;129(25
Suppl 2):S49-73.
11. McKhann GM, Knopman DS,
Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease:
recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association
workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement
2011;7(3):263-269.
12. Lewczuk P, Riederer P,
O'Bryant SE, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for
neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on
Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of
Biological Psychiatry. World J Biol Psychiatry 2018;19(4):244-328.
13. Tudorascu DL, Minhas DS,
Lao PJ, et al. The use of Centiloids for applying [(11)C]PiB classification
cutoffs across region-of-interest delineation methods. Alzheimers Dement (Amst)
2018;10:332-339.
14. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block
WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow
quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26(4):743-749.
15. Johnson KM, Lum DP,
Turski PA, Block WF, Mistretta CA, Wieben O. Improved 3D phase contrast MRI
with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med
2008;60(6):1329-1336.
16. Liu J, Redmond MJ,
Brodsky EK, et al. Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR
angiography data using an undersampled 3-D projection trajectory. IEEE Trans
Med Imaging 2006;25(2):148-157.
17. Schrauben E, Wahlin A,
Ambarki K, et al. Fast 4D flow MRI intracranial segmentation and quantification
in tortuous arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42(5):1458-1464.
18. Buijs PC,
Krabbe-Hartkamp MJ, Bakker CJ, et al. Effect of age on cerebral blood flow:
measurement with ungated two-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in 250
adults. Radiology 1998;209(3):667-674.
19. Amin-Hanjani S, Du X,
Pandey DK, Thulborn KR, Charbel FT. Effect of age and vascular anatomy on blood
flow in major cerebral vessels. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism :
official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and
Metabolism 2015;35(2):312-318.
20. Wu C, Honarmand AR,
Schnell S, et al. Age-Related Changes of Normal Cerebral and Cardiac Blood Flow
in Children and Adults Aged 7 Months to 61 Years. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5(1).
21. Enzmann DR, Pelc NJ. Normal
flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with
phase-contrast cine MR imaging. Radiology 1991;178(2):467-474.
22. Scheel P, Ruge C,
Petruch UR, Schöning M. Color duplex measurement of cerebral blood flow volume
in healthy adults. Stroke 2000;31(1):147-150.
23. Wierenga CE, Clark LR,
Dev SI, et al. Interaction of age and APOE genotype on cerebral blood flow at
rest. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 2013;34(4):921-935.