Xin Dong1,2, Arnold Ng3,4, Sharon Watson5, Harish Sharma5, Graham Galloway1,2,6, and Margot Lehman5
1Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Australia, 3Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, 4University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 5Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, 6The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
Synopsis
The
usefulness of T1 and ECV mappings in the context of radiation cardiotoxicity
has yet to be studied. In the current study, we conducted a longitudinal CMR
study on 30 females with left-sided breast cancer before and after Deep
Inspiration Breast Hold (DIBH) radiotherapy (RT). The results showed patients who were treated with DIBH RT
had no CMR detectable functional or structural myocardial changes 6 months
following RT treatment. This has important implications on the long-term
cardiac health of the growing number of women who are surviving or living with
breast cancer.
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most
common malignancy and leading cause of cancer-related death in women (1).
Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) following surgery reduces the risk of
locoregional recurrence and improves survival. However, unintentional cardiac irradiation
is associated with increased risk of long-term adverse cardiac effects
including cardiomyopathy (2).
Quantitative T1
mapping by cardiovascular MR (CMR) evaluates diffuse myocardial structural changes
non-invasively using parameters such as T1 relaxation constant and
extracellular volume (ECV) fraction. Both acute and prolonged elevations in ECV
have been observed in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (3).
The usefulness of T1 and ECV mappings in the context of radiation
cardiotoxicity has yet to be studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate
early myocardial changes in women who underwent RT for left-sided breast cancer,
using CMR T1 and ECV metrics.
Research subjects
Institutional ethics
approval and written informed consent were obtained.
N=30 females with left-sided
breast cancer requiring radiotherapy were recruited. Exclusion criteria
included participants with significant coronary artery disease, history of
myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, significant valvular disease, renal
insufficiency (eGFR < 30ml/min/1.73m2), age <18 years and contradictions
to MRI. Study protocol
CMR examinations were
performed on a 60cm 3.0T MRI system (Prisma, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany)
using two 30-channel flex arrays. The scanning protocol included a stack of
short-axis cine images covering
the entire end-diastolic Left Ventricle(LV); pre- and 10 minutes post- contrast
(Gadovist, Bayer, Germany, dose=0.2mmol/kg) modified MOLLI (MyoMaps, Siemens)
in short-axis images at basal, mid, and apical levels; and 15minutes late
gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images. All sequences were acquired
with cardiac ECG gating and end-expiratory breath-hold.
CMR was performed prior
to commencement of radiation treatment and repeated 6 months post treatment. Blood
samples were collected for haematocrit immediately before or after each CMR.
All RT treatments were planned and performed on
a breast board using Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) technique as per our
departmental protocol.Image analysis
Segment (v2.2 R6190, Medviso, Lund, Sweden) was
used for image analysis. LV volume and Ejection
Fraction (EF) were derived using short-axis cine stack. T1 mapping was
generated offline using unprocessed MOLLI images. The ROIs were placed within
manually segmented myocardium with a further 20% erosion in both endo- and
epicardial directions.
The equation for calculating the extracellular
volume (ECV) is: $$$ECV=(1/(T1myo
postgad)-1/(T1myo native))/(1/(T1blood postgad)-1/(T1blood
native))×(1-hematocrit)Statistical analysis
All continuous variables were tested
for Gaussian distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The changes in LV
were analysed by the paired Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. A
two-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered significant. All statistical
analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 25 (SPSS Inc.; Armonk,
NY: IBM Corp).
Results
All 30
patients (age = 56 ± 10) returned for their follow-up CMR with a mean
inter-scan interval of 7.9 months. The average mean heart dose (MHD) was 1.83 ± 0.93 Gy.
Table 1 outlines clinical and CMR characteristics of participants. No significant
functional (EF) or structural (T1 and ECV) difference was found between
baseline and 6 month post-treatment follow-up.
Discussion
T1
mapping represents the longitudinal relaxation time and ECV reflects the volume
fraction of extracellular matrix or interstitial space, both are objective
measures of the myocardial integrity. Elevated ECV has been reported in cancer
survivors following anthracycline exposure regardless of the presence of
symptomatic cardiomyopathy (3). Similarly, Hatakenaka et al. were
able to use MRI to demonstrate impaired LV function following concurrent
chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer (4). However, in our breast cancer
cohort, no CMR parameter was significantly changed. This may be explained by
the fact that our cohort received significantly less cardiac radiation than
previous reports.
The
cohort in the current study received 1.83 Gy MHD
via the DIBH technique, as opposed to 5.2 Gy reported in a recent large-scale
systematic review (5). Due to the linear relationship
between the dose and the degree of cardiotoxicity, the potential myocardial
changes were likely to be less in the DIBH cohort, and thus statistically
insignificant.
Furthermore,
clinical manifestations of radiation induced cardiotoxicity (RIC) have been
observed in the first 5 years following RT (6), whereas an image-based study
using 2D speckle tracing echocardiography could identify a decline in LV strain
as early as 6 weeks post RT (7). With variable latency in the
development of cardiotoxic effects, it is not clear when the deregulation of
the myocardial interstitium begins. Multiple time-point CMR studies may be of
use to better understand the pathogenesis of RIC. Conclusions
The present pilot study showed
patients who were treated with DIBH RT for left-sided breast cancer had no CMR detectable
functional or structural myocardial changes 6 months following RT treatment.
These results suggest that decreased radiation dose techniques, such as DIBH,
may be beneficial in preventing radiation induced cardiac injury. This has
important implications on the long-term cardiac health of the growing number of
women who are surviving or living with breast cancer.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Ferlay
J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin D, Piñeros M, et al.
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources
and methods. International journal of cancer. 2019;144(8):1941-53.
2. Rygiel K. Cardiotoxic effects of
radiotherapy and strategies to reduce them in patients with breast cancer: an
overview. Journal of cancer research and therapeutics. 2017;13(2):186.
3. Jordan JH, Hundley WG. MRI of
Cardiotoxicity. Cardiology Clinics. 2019;37(4):429-39.
4. Hatakenaka M, Yonezawa M, Nonoshita
T, Nakamura K, Yabuuchi H, Shioyama Y, et al. Acute cardiac impairment
associated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: magnetic
resonance evaluation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology*
Physics. 2012;83(1):e67-e73.
5. Taylor C, Correa C, Duane FK, Aznar
MC, Anderson SJ, Bergh J, et al. Estimating the risks of breast cancer
radiotherapy: evidence from modern radiation doses to the lungs and heart and
from previous randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
2017;35(15):1641.
6. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet
AM, Blom-Goldman U, Brønnum D, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women
after radiotherapy for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine.
2013;368(11):987-98.
7. Lo
Q, Hee L, Batumalai V, Allman C, MacDonald P, Delaney GP, et al. Subclinical
cardiac dysfunction detected by strain imaging during breast irradiation with
persistent changes 6 weeks after treatment. International Journal of Radiation
Oncology• Biology• Physics. 2015;92(2):268-76.