Gail H Kohls1, Robert Shih2, J Kevin Demarco2, and Maureen Hood2
1Radiology, USU/WRNMMC, MIDDLETOWN, MD, United States, 2Radiology, WRNMMC, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
The concepts behind diffusion imaging are complicated. As
Technologist/Radiographers we use these finished pulse sequences in our daily work,
but we do not always have the background information of how each sequence is
developed and why it is an important part of the imaging we perform. This abstract
is an attempt give the Technologist/Radiographer a better understanding of the
key concepts of diffusion and how the diffusion sequences such as Diffusion
Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) measure water
movement.
Background:
Diffusion imaging techniques have become a major
part of diagnostic imaging today. MR Radiographers/Technologists around the
world use them daily yet, the various types of diffusion pulse sequences and the
concept of diffusion itself are often not well understood. The purpose of this
abstract is to help describe the basic fundamentals of diffusion and how they
are applied to MR imagingTeaching Points:
Diffusion is a physical
process that refers to the net movement of molecules in a random translational
motion from a region of high concentration to one of lower concentration due to
thermal energies of the molecules, which is often referred to as Brownian
Motion [1]. In MRI we are referring to the movement of water molecules over
time. In a free, unrestricted medium, molecules move randomly over time and
over a three-dimensional (3D) space that can be calculated assuming a 3D
gaussian distribution [2]. The statistical distance of random travel is
described by a diffusion coefficient (D) [3].
The
technical innovations needed to merge diffusion statistics with MR imaging did
not occur until the 1980’s with the first DWI images of the brain presented at
the 1985 London SMRM Meeting by Le Bihan [4]. In order to better describe the
complex diffusion found in biological tissues on a voxel scale, Le Bihan
introduced the statistical
parameter apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) [5]. The ADC is calculated from
scans performed at different b values. ADC reflects the degree of diffusion (movement)
of water molecules through tissues.
The “b value” is key to the diffusion sequence, which is based on the
time course and intensity of the magnetic field pulses. Higher b values are
more sensitive to diffusion, but also have low signal to noise (SNR). The pulse
sequences used to acquire diffusion are usually echo planar or fast gradient
recalled echo scans acquired in a set, one without the diffusion gradients and
one with the diffusion gradients in order to eliminate the contribution from T1
and T2 weighting and calculate the ADC maps of the diffusion in a voxel by
voxel basis [6]. The first part of the sequence pair is most commonly referred
to as the “b-0” component that is used to separate the diffusion background
from the diffusion measurement acquisition part. The T2 component in diffusion
imaging can be significant and sometimes prolonged, resulting in a
hyperintensity on the images referred to as T2 shine-through. The ADC maps
helps to determine if the hyperintensity on a DWI is from true reduction in
diffusion or T2 shine through [7]. DWI techniques can be
quite helpful in clinical imaging, especially in tumor characterization and
cerebral ischemia where assessment of microcirculation can help characterize
areas of free and restricted water movement.
The thought of looking at
restriction of movement, displacement, and tortuosity of structural
compartments was speculated by many and eventually lead to the concept of anisotropy
or directional water movement. In 1994, the diffusion tensor was described by
Basser, Mattiello and Le Bihan as a mathematical way to characterize anisotropic
diffusion [8] (Figure 1). Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is based on a
Gaussian model, just as DWI, in that it describes the diffusion of water
molecules assuming a Gaussian description of the movement of the water
molecules but it looks at the displacement in all directions. A symmetric tensor of diffusion along each axis with
correlation of displacements along each axis was described that became known as
the diffusion tensor vectors. There are three eigenvalues (or diffusivities)
and three eigenvectors (principal directions) associated with tensor concept
that define the movement frame through their magnitude of diffusivity. The diffusion
tensor model allowed for the development of more mathematical descriptions that
we use in diffusion such as fractional anisotropy (FA),
mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD)
[8,9]. DTI is able to
collect a combination of factors such as the mean diffusion, the degree of
anisotropy and the direction of a fiber which has enabled fiber maps and
tractography. Basic DTI is limited in that it cannot discern multiple fibers
running in multiple directions within a single voxel. For techniques such as fiber tracking, the
individual voxels are then connected to each other by mathematically connecting
the adjacent voxels.
Diffusion MRI has grown
into a whole host of techniques including non-Gaussian techniques to try to
predict the changes to microstructure on a nanometer range while our images are
on the millimeter range. Among the newer diffusion are Diffusion Kurtosis
Imaging (DKI), Q-Space, Diffusion
Spectral Imaging (DSI), Q-ball, and Quasi-diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
(QDI) [8-12] as researchers strive to explore microstructure and the structures
of the human bodySummary:
Diffusion imaging is common in modern
MRI examinations and looks at the random movement of water molecules over time.
Diffusion weighted imaging evolved first, defining b values and the apparent
diffusion coefficient for MRI. DWI/ADC is used clinically to detect acute
stroke, purulent fluid, and hypercellular tumor. The interest to evaluate the
microstructure of neural tissues has allowed the field of diffusion to grow
into tensor imaging and beyond.
Acknowledgements
Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense.References
1. Einstein
A. Zur theorie der brownschen
bewegung, Ann. Phys., 1906, 324(2), 371–381.
2. Einstein
A. Ber die von der molecularkinetischen Theorie der W.rme geforderte Bewegung
von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig).
1905; 17:549–569.
3. Von
Smoluchowski M. Zur kinetischen theorie der brownschen molekularbewegung und
der suspensionen, Ann. Phys., 1906, 326(14), 756–780.
4. Le
Bihan D, Breton E, Syrota A. In-Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of
Self-Diffusion. Proceedings of the International
Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, August 19-23, 1985, P1238. London, UK.
5. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P,
Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions:
application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986;161:401–407.
6. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P,
Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions:
application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986
Nov;161(2):401-7.
7. Burdette JH, Elster AD, Ricci PE. Acute cerebral
infarction: quantification of spin-density and T2 shine-through phenomena on
diffusion-weighted MR images. Radiology. 1999 Aug;212(2):333-9.
8. Basser Peter J., Mattiello James, LeBihan Denis.
Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo.
(Series B).Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 1994;103:247–254.
9. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di
Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology. 1996;201:637.
10. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K.
Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water
diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005
Jun;53(6):1432-40.
11. Van AT, Granziera C, Bammer R. An introduction
to model-independent diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;21(6):339-354.
12. Barrick TR, Spilling CA, Ingo C, Madigan J,
Isaacs JD, Rich P, Jones TL, Magin RL, Hall MG, Howe FA. Quasi-diffusion
magnetic resonance imaging (QDI): A fast, high b-value diffusion imaging
technique. Neuroimage. 2020 May 1;211:116606.
13. Lerner A, Mogensen MA, Kim PE, Shiroishi MS,
Hwang DH, Law M. Clinical applications of diffusion tensor imaging. World
Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):96-109.