Bastien Guerin1
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
I will present some key tools for simulation of RF coils. First,
I will review the three main types of EM solver: Finite difference time domain,
finite element modeling and integral equation. I will introduce the co-simulation
method, a powerful method for tuning, matching and decoupling of coil that
requires a minimum number of EM solves. I will then present a simulation study that
aims to find the ideal pTx coil for 3T body and head imaging. Finally, I will
present our recent work on ultra-fast SAR calculation as the patient lies in
the scanner for individualized SAR prediction.
Synopsis
I will present some key tools for simulation of RF coils. First,
I will review the three main types of EM solver: Finite difference time domain,
finite element modeling and integral equation. I will introduce the co-simulation
method, a powerful method for tuning, matching and decoupling of coil that
requires a minimum number of EM solves. I will then present a simulation study that
aims to find the ideal pTx coil for 3T body and head imaging. Finally, I will
present our recent work on ultra-fast SAR calculation as the patient lies in
the scanner for individualized SAR prediction.Summary
FDTD, FEM or IE; which to choose? I will weigh the pros and
cons of each EM solver and will introduce the co-simulation method for fast
tuning, matching and decoupling in simulation. At the end of this talk, you
will be ready to simulate any coils with confidence!Take home messages
1)
EM solvers have different strengths and
weaknesses, so one needs to choose the right one for the job at hand.
2)
Unless your coil has a single port and you don’t
mind long simulation times, use the co-simulation for fast tuning, matching and
decoupling.
3)
FDTD is good to quickly evaluate the broadband response
of the coil, since it is a time-domain simulation (frequency response computed
in a single solve).
4)
FDTD is naturally compatible with voxel body
models, which is a major advantage.
5)
FEM with tetrahedron discretization is an extremely
powerful adaptive mesh strategy, that allows simulation of widely different geometrical
scales in a single model (microns to meters) without paying a high computation
price (computation time increases linearly with the number of elements, not
quadratically like FDTD).
6)
FEM can compute multi-port system in a single
solve (FDTD requires N-solves for an S-port system).
7)
MARIE (Magnetic Resonance Integral Equation) is
a powerful coupled surface integral equation / volume integral equation solver
that allows modeling thin conductors and voxel body models.
8)
MARIE is fast.
9)
For pTx coils: Use an FEM solver and a powerful
circuit simulator (ADS if available).
10)
For birdcage coils: FDTD works fine here since
there are few capacitors values to optimize and we generally have a good idea
of their values. Many body models available for FDTD (voxels), which makes it
practical to study population SAR (mean +/- std. dev.).
11)
For Rx coils: Use MARIE for this application,
which can be more easily batched and is faster than other tools. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
No reference found.