Yue Zhu1,2, William A Grissom1,2,3,4, John C Gore1,2,3,4, and Xinqiang Yan1,2
1Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 4Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
A low loss ratio adjustable power splitter (RAPS) was
designed with a Wilkinson Splitter, a pair of transmission lines, and a hybrid
coupler. There are some potential issues with the previous RAPS: 1. Build a
high-performance RAPS circuit with lumped elements is challenging and laborious
at 298 MHz. 2. The 100-Ohm RF decoupling resistor poses a safety hazard to the
patient. In this abstract, the Wilkinson splitter was replaced with a hybrid
coupler, and the adjustable transmission lines are replaced with printed
microstrip lines to mitigate the problems mentioned above.
Purpose
Add-on RF shimming device can provide more freedom to
manipulate the transmit field in high field MRI by controlling more coil elements
even with few large-sized and high-cost power amplifiers [1-4]. The ratio
adjustable power splitter (RAPS) [5]
is such a circuit that enables the control of power ratio transferred to
different coils by changing the phase shift between a Wilkinson splitter and a
hybrid coupler. We propose a hybrid pair RAPS (HP-RAPS) using off-shelf
components and easy-to-produce and easy-to-replace microstrip phase shifters to
solve challenges encountered in the previous RAPS circuit, for example, laborious
manufacture process and potential safety concern due to power dissipation.Methods
Theory
Figure 1a shows the HP-RAPS design's circuit diagram, composed of two hybrid couplers and microstrip lines between them. Figure 1b
shows the derivation of power ratio between two output ports using chain transmission
matrices. First, the transmission matrix of the HP-RAPS ($$$\it T_{RAPS}$$$) is calculated by multiplying
three transmission matrices in series: $$$\it T_{RAPS} = T_{hc}T_{tm}T_{hc}$$$, where $$$\it T_{hc}$$$ and $$$\it T_{tm}$$$ are the transmission matrices of the hybrid
coupler and microstrip lines, respectively. Then $$$\it T_{RAPS}$$$ is converted to scattering
(S-) parameter matrix [5].
Design Consideration
Unlike the commercial non-magnetic power splitter, usually
bulky and high-cost (>$1K), a non-magnetic hybrid coupler only costs $20-$60. It can be provided in small sizes (for example, the coupler used in this
abstract is only 1.27x3.53x0.36 cm3). By carefully choosing the
models for special applications, the insertion loss and amp/phase imbalance
could be <0.1 dB and <0.1 dB/2 degrees, respectively. The only component we
need to design and fabricate is the microstrip lines. The phase difference
between the two traces is realized by designing one trace to be straight (less
phase delay, fixed) and the other meander (more phase delay, variable). The
length difference between the two lines is achieved by varying the total length
of the meandering.
Simulation
We first simulated a pair of microstrip lines with one
straight line and one square meandering line with the Ansys HFSSEM package
(Ansys, Canonsburg, PA). We exported the S-matrix of these pairs of microstrip
lines into Ansys Designer. With the S-matrix of hybrid couplers based on the
manufacturer's datasheet, we simulated the S-matrix of the whole HP-circuit.
The impedance and phase shift of a straight microstrip line is straightforward
and can be found in textbooks[6].
For a Rogers 3010 board with a dielectric constant of 10.2 and thickness of
1.27 mm, the optimal trace width for 50 Ohm is 1.18 mm. However, for the meandering line, its impedance and
phase shift deviated from the standard equations and need to be corrected [7].
In this work, to make sure the microstrip line has a Characteristic impedance
of 50 Ohm, we investigate the
impedance variations with trace widths from 0.72 mm to 1.12 mm.
Fabrication and Evaluation
The HP-RAPS comprises a motherboard (Rogers 4003C) with two
hybrid couplers (IPP2026, Holbrook, NY), a daughterboard (phase
shifter board) with one straight and one meandering microstrip (Rogers 3010),
and a 3D printed cover that fasten the daughterboard to the motherboard. The
motherboard is fixed and served as a ground, while the daughterboard is
replaceable to realize desired power split ratios. Figure 2 shows the
Solidworks drawing and the photograph of an HP-RAPS with a split ratio of 1:1.Results and Discussion
Simulation
Figure 3 shows the simulated insertion loss, matching, and
phase difference of the daughterboard's microstrip lines. The insertion loss
increases as the microstrip line's length increase (figure 3a), but it is still
only -0.20 dB when the phase delays up to 150 degrees. The straight line with
calculated width (1.18mm) achieved a superior matching of -45 dB. The Characteristic
impedance or the matching of the meandering line depends on its size and
length. However, we found a universal width (0.92 mm) that can achieve
acceptable matching performance with any lengths (<-30 dB).
Fabricated device bench test
The bench test results of boards are shown in Figures 4 and
5. The ratios of the two output by input from port 1 are consistent with the equations
in Figure 1b and the simulation results in Figure 3b. Compared to the previous
coaxial cable phase shifter design, the microstrip design considerably eased
the production procedure and improved accuracy. The insertion loss for all the tested boards is approximately 0.33 dB. The non-perfect
impedance matching (about -16 dB) causes partial insertion loss, which can be
further reduced. The insertion loss is less compared to the previous RAPS circuit
(averaged 0.54 dB) [1]
is mainly because of the removal of SMA connectors.
The isolation between each board is good (about -25 dB). The
50-Ohm isolation resistor is designed to be moved far away from the circuit
with a standard cable without crossing any components. Conclusion
A Hybrid Pair Ratio Adjustable Power Splitter (HP-RAPS) was
theoretically analyzed, designed, simulated, fabricated, and bench test. In
addition to benefits inherited from the previous RAPS circuit (high-power
handling, compact size, low-loss, and ratio-adjustable), the new HP-RAPS is more
comfortable to build, easier to reproduce, and exhibits a lower power loss
(0.33 dB for the whole board).Acknowledgements
This
project is supported by NIH R01 EB016695.References
1. Cao Z, Yan X, Grissom W A. Array-compressed
parallel transmit pulse design. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76:1158-1169.
2. Yan X, Cao Z, Grissom W A. Ratio-adjustable power splitters for array-compressed parallel
transmission. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:2422–243.
3. Yan X, Cao Z, Grissom W A. Experimental
implementation of array-compressed parallel transmission at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson
Med. 2016;75:2545-2552.
4. Sun C,
Patel K, Wilcox M, et al. A retrofit to enable dynamic B+ 1 steering for
transmit arrays without multiple amplifiers. Magn Reson Med. 2020;00:1–13.
5. Frei J, Cai X, Muller S, Multiport S-Parameter and T-Parameter Conversion With Symmetry Extension. IEEE Trans Microw Theory
Tech. 2008;56:2493–2504.
6. Microwave Engineering, 4th Edition |
Wiley, Wiley.com.
https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Microwave+Engineering%2C+4th+Edition-p-9780470631553. Accessed December 15, 2020.
7. Nakamura T, Sekine T, Yokokawa S. An analysis of meandering lines. Electron Commun Jpn Part Commun. 1986;59:99–106.