Kevin Waescher1, Simon Reiss1, Ali Caglar Özen1,2, Thomas Lottner1, and Michael Bock1
1Dept. of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 2German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Synopsis
MR-guided catheterization with
injection of Gd-based contrast agent allows for quantitative perfusion
measurement of the myocardium in coronary interventions. However, Gd is
contraindicated in patients with impaired renal function, and it changes the
relaxation times in the target organ after injection, so that a
characterization of the target tissue becomes difficult. In this study, we
provide a different solution to quantify perfusion using arterial spin labelling
with a catheter based coil. The results show that ASL using a local catheter
based labelling coil provides an alternative technique for perfusion
measurements during cardiovascular interventions without exogenous contrast
agents.
Introduction
MR-guided
catheterization allows for selective perfusion measurements of the target
organ, e.g. the myocardium in coronary interventions1,2,3. For this purpose,
Gd-based contrast agent solutions are injected via a catheter. However, Gd is
contraindicated in patients with impaired renal function, and it changes the relaxation
times in the target organ after injection, so that a characterization of the
target tissue becomes difficult. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is an alternative
method for perfusion quantification that does not rely on the application of
exogenous contrast agents4,5,6. During an intervention, however, the
labeling in ASL needs to be targeted towards a specific vascular territory,
which requires a complex setup of the labeling slice.
In
this study, ASL is implemented using an active catheter, which is equipped with
a small loop RF coil at the tip. Using this coil as a transmit coil, we
demonstrate the feasibility for selective spin labeling which might be used for
MR-guided coronary interventions3.Methods
Selective ASL measurements
were performed at a clinical 3T MRI system (PRISMA fit, Siemens) (Fig.
1). To mimic myocardial perfusion, a dialysis filter was connected
to a tube (d = 6 mm) through which water could be pumped at varying velocities.
A 5F catheter was placed in the tube equipped with an active single
loop coil (l = 2 cm, d = 4 mm) at the distal tip. The catheter was connected to
a signal generator (N5181A/MXG, Agilent) via a tuning
and matching circuit.
For the ASL image acquisition,
a FLASH sequence was modified so that a 2ms-long labeling transmit pulse was applied
at the end of every TR period. The sequence parameters
were set to TR = 4.2 ms, TE = 1.7 ms, resolution = 0.94 mm, slice
thickness = 5mm, bandwidth = 300 Hz/px. In each measurement, 30 consecutive
images with labeling pulse were acquired followed by 30 reference images without
labeling, and the signal difference was calculated.
To determine the optimal labeling
frequency, a resonance curve was measured where the labeling frequency was
varied around the MR system’s resonance frequency over
1 KHz in steps of 50 Hz. A Lorentzian function was fitted to the mean
signal measured around the catheter tip (Fig. 2a). The power dependency was
assessed by varying the output power of the signal generator from 0.1 mW to 50 mW.
The signal difference as a function of the square root of the power was
analyzed with a linear regression. Both the frequency and power series were
measured without flow. To visualize the
labeling, ASL measurements were performed with two different flow velocities: 12.6
cm/s and 33.7 cm/s, corresponding to flow rates of 2.9
ml/s and 7.4 ml/s.
The velocities were measured in a cross section
of the supplying tube.
An additional experiment
was carried out in which the labeling pulse was switched on and off every 10
frames. The MR signal time course was correlated to the labeling paradigm (similar
to an fMRI experiment) to create a correlation angiography7.Results
The measured resonance
curve follows the expected Lorentzian line shape (R2 = 0.98) with a
center frequency that is off-set to frequency of the
tomograph by Δf = (334.1 ± 2.6) Hz (Fig. 2a). In addition, the
signal difference depends linearly on the square root of the output power (R2 > 0.99, Fig. 2b), which is consistent
with a low flip angle excitation. Figure 3 shows the results from the perfusion
phantom measurements - the ASL signal decays along
the down-stream direction from the tip of the catheter onwards. With increasing
flow velocity the labeled water could reach more distal sections of the
perfusion phantom. The distance within the perfusion
phantom after which the signal difference is halved (x1/2) was
determined by an exponential fit, yielding x1/2 = (1.16 ± 0.35) cm for a flow of 2.9 ml/s and x1/2 = (2.35
± 0.15) cm for a flow of 7.4 ml/s. Figure 4 shows the results of the experiment with alternating
labelling pulse. The
correlation map between the applied labelling and the measured signal shows high correlation from the catheter onward, which decays within the phantom. Compared
to the signal difference map, the correlation map shows a more homogeneous
distribution of the perfused area within the phantom.Discussion & Outlook
This study demonstrates that
labelling of spins can be achieved with a single loop coil, attached to
an active guiding catheter. The frequency as well as the power dependence show
an expected Lorentzian and square root behaviour. As
is proportional to the applied flip
angle near the catheter tip, the observed linearity of the power curve implies
that only low flip angles are applied (sin(a) ≈ a). Thus, the ASL signal can
further be increased using higher power outputs, or longer labelling pulses.
The flow of the labelled spins and their distribution in the flow phantom could
be visualized via the signal difference. The decrease of the signal difference in
flow direction from the catheter coil is a consequence of the T1 decay of the
labelled magnetization. The experiment shows, that intra-arterial spin
labelling with an active catheter may offer an alternative technique for
perfusion measurements during cardiovascular interventions without exogenous contrast
agents.Acknowledgements
Grant support by the
German Science Foundation (DFG) under grant number BO 3025/11-1 and CRC 1425 (Project
P15) is gratefully acknowledged.References
1. Serfaty, J.M.,
et al. “MRI-guided coronary catheterization and PTCA: A feasibility study on a
dog model” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 49.2 (2003): 258-63.
2. Omary, R., et
al. “Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Coronary Catheterization in
Swine” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 107.21 (2003): 2656-59.
3. Heidt, T., et
al. “Real-time magnetic resonance imaging–guided coronary intervention in a
porcine model” Scientific reports, 9.1 (2019): 1-10.
4. Kober, Frank, et al. "Myocardial arterial spin labeling." Journal
of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 18.1 (2016): 22.
5.
Mildner, T., et al. "
Functional perfusion imaging using continuous arterial spin labeling with
separate labeling and imaging coils at 3 T" Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 49.5 (2003): 791-95.
6.
Talagala, S.L., et al.
"Whole‐brain 3D perfusion MRI at 3.0 T using CASL with a separate labeling
coil." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52.1 (2004): 131-40.
7. Bock, Michael, et al. "Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 43.3 (2000): 481-487.