Shi Yin1, Dou Weiqiang2, and Ding Hongyuan1
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, 2GE Healthcare, MR Research, Beijing, P.R. China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
This study aims to if quantitative
MR DTI technology combined with conventional MR can be applied to increase
diagnostic efficiency and improve the diagnostic accuracy for lateral lumbar
spinal canal stenosis in clinical. By measuring 99 patients, we found in
extraspinal sub-regions of Lumbar nerve root, imaging findings of nerve edema,
increased diameter and decreased FA values have an ideal diagnostic performance
in LLSCS. Besides, among all include parameters, nerve edema demonstrated the
best diagnostic performance. Therefore, conventional MR combined with
quantitative MR DTI/DTT has a good performance for visualizing and quantitative
diagnosis in lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
INTRODUCTION
Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LLSCS)
is one of the most critical pathologies, especially for predominant lower
extremities radicular symptoms in patients with lower back and leg pain1, 2. MRI can evaluate the symptomatic patient with both central and lateral
spinal canal pathology3. Using
conventional MRI, spinal canal stenosis can be indicated at both the intracanal
and foraminal sites, but sometimes includes false positives at the lateral spinal
canal region, especially the extraforaminal lesions4. Intraoperative electrophysiology can be used to diagnose LLSCS, but
this method is too invasive to be generally performed5, 6. This
study's main goal was to investigate if quantitative MR diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI) technology7 combined with conventional MR can be applied to
increase diagnostic efficiency and improve the diagnostic accuracy for LLSCS in
clinical.METHODS
Subjects
Ninety-nine LLSCS patients (50 men, age: 60.2±13.6
years; 49 women, age: 60.69±10.6 years) undergoing transforaminal endoscopic
discectomy from the orthopedic inpatient department between January 2018 and December
2019 were included in this study. All patients received percutaneous
transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) by one senior surgeon with 16 years
of experience.
MRI imaging protocol
All patients were scanned on a 3.0 T MR scanner (Discovery 750w, GE Healthcare) with an 16-channel body
coil before surgery. Conventional lumbar MRI protocol was performed, including
axial T2WI fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 2810/84 ms) sequence, sagittal T2WI fast
spin-echo (TR/TE, 3000/109 ms) and T1WI (TR/TE, 800/9.6 ms) sequences. T2
fat-saturated 3D Cube sequences (TR/TE, 2040/128 ms) were obtained angled on lumbosacral
plexus. Based on the anatomical imaging mentioned above, DTI sequence was
performed for L4 to S1 nerve roots with the following parameters: TR/TE,
6000/80 ms; MPG applied in 11 directions; FOV, 420 mm × 420 mm; matrix size, 96
× 128; voxel size, 4.38 mm × 3.28 mm × 4.0 mm; calculated voxel size, 1.64 mm ×
1.64 mm × 4.0 mm; NEX, 4; slice number, 60; slice thickness, 4mm; slice gap, 0;
b-value, 800s/mm2.
Data analysis
The classifications of lumbar foraminal
stenosis and the edema of nerve roots were assessed by conventional lumbar MR and
T2 fat-saturated 3D Cube MR sequences. On T2 fat-saturated 3D Cube MR sequences,
the diameters of the corresponding nerve and contralateral asymptomatic nerve
were measured at the extraspinal region to avoid the effects of lateral spinal
canal stenosis. DTI data were processed with DTI post-processing software
embedded into the Functool platform at a GE workstation (Advantage workstation
4.6; GE Medical Systems). DTI derived FA/ADC parametrical mappings were
obtained correspondingly on the fusion image with axial T2-weighted images. The
regions of interest (ROIs) were placed respectively at proximal and distal
sub-regions, correspond to the foraminal zone and extraforaminal zone of the
nerve roots8, 9.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 25.0 software was used to perform
statistical analysis. The statistical figures were drawn using Graphpad Prism
8.0. Descriptive statistics were listed in the form of mean and standard
deviation. The embedded paired t-test toolbox was applied to respectively
compare the diameters and FA/ADC values of nerves at the symptomatic and
asymptomatic sides. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis,
sensitivity, specificity, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to
evaluate the diagnostic ability of MR morphological and DTI parameters.RESULTS
Routine MR sequences and 3D MR multiple
planar reconstruction (MPR) showed that lumbar disc hernia (LDH) related LLSCS occurred
in 90 cases, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (LFH) caused the rest 9 cases. 85 cases
(85.9%) were observed corresponding nerve roots edema by T2 fat-saturated 3D MPR
imaging in both LDH and LFH related LLSCS. Meanwhile, increased diameters of the
symptomatic nerves were observed at extraspinal region
than asymptomatic side (p<0.001). Lower FA values of the nerves were
observed at the symptomatic than asymptomatic side from proximal to distal
sub-regions (p<0.001, Fig. 1). Distal FA values of edema group were
significantly lower than negative group (p<0.02, Fig. 2). The visual
abnormalities of tractography were found mainly in the extraforaminal (34 cases,
34.3%) and extraspinal (57 cases, 57.6%) region of compressed nerves (Fig. 3). The
ROC curve for nerve edema had the highest AUC of 0.929 (95% CI 0.884 - 0.961); the
cut point showed sensitivity and specificity of 85.9% and 100%, respectively. In
addition to this, the ROC curve for distal FA and nerve diameter both had AUCs
>0.80 (Fig. 4).DISCUSSION
In this study, combined with conventional
MR and quantitative MR DTI, the result indicates that, in extraspinal sub-regions
of Lumbar nerve root, imaging findings of nerve edema, increased diameter, and decreased
DTI FA values have an ideal diagnostic performance in LLSCS. Besides, among all
include parameters, nerve edema demonstrated the best diagnostic performance. Compared
with intraspinal related nerve compression, nerve edema as a pathological
feature of LLSC, are easily observed by conventional MR. Decreased DTI FA and notable
DTT changes based on nerve edema in extraspinal sub-regions of Lumbar nerve root
are characteristic imaging findings in LLSCS.CONCLUSION
Based on the characteristic pathological
change of nerve root edema in extraspinal sub-regions, conventional MR combined
with quantitative MR DTI/DTT has a good performance for visualizing and
quantitative diagnosis in lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update.
Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(3):389-94.
2. Postacchini F. Surgical
management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
1999;24(10):1043-7.
3. Malfair D, Beall
DP. Imaging the degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging
Clin N Am. 2007;15(2):221-38.
4. Orita S, Inage K, Eguchi Y, et
al. Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1. Eur J
Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26(7):685-93.
5. Iwasaki H, Yoshida
M, Yamada H, et al. A new electrophysiological method for the diagnosis of
extraforaminal stenosis at L5-s1. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(2):145-9.
6. El BA,
Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama ANG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in
follow-up assessment of sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):999-1007.
7. Eguchi Y, Kanamoto H, Oikawa Y,
et al. Recent advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging of lumbar nerve to
clinical applications: A review of clinical studies utilizing Diffusion Tensor
Imaging and Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography. Spine Surg Relat
Res. 2017;1(2):61-71.
8. Eguchi Y, Ohtori
S, Suzuki M, et al. Discrimination between Lumbar Intraspinal Stenosis and
Foraminal Stenosis using Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters: Preliminary
Results. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(2):327-34.
9. Fardon DF,
Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc
nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the
North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the
American Society of Neuroradiology. The Spine Journal. 2014;14(11):2525-45.