Victor Babu Kassey1,2,3,4, Matthias Walle1, Jonathan Egan1, Diana Yeritsyan1, Yaotang Wu2,3,4, Brian D Snyder2,4, Edward Rodriguez1,2, Jerome Ackerman2,5, and Ara Nazarian1,2,4
1Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 5Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
Synopsis
Bone
matrix and mineral densities (BMD) are important parameters to identify bone
diseases such as osteoporosis and osteomalacia. Micro-CT, CT, and DXA scans provide
bone mineral densities but not bone matrix. In this study, a non-invasive,
radiation-free, and clinically proven combined 1H/31P MRI
method was developed to measure bone matrix and mineral densities from rat
bones from the same volume-of-interest sequentially in a single session. A
custom-designed home-made double-tuned single volume coil was designed for 7T,
and 1H/31P ZTE rat bone images were obtained, auto-registered,
bone matrix and mineral densities were computed quantitatively, and osteoporosis
and osteomalacia were successfully identified.
Introduction: Osteoporosis (OP) and
Osteomalacia (OM) are two different bone diseases, where quantitative
measurements of bone matrix and mineral densities (BMD) are important to identify
and differentiate osteoporosis and osteomalacia(1). BMD is
measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), but it cannot distinguish OP
from OM, since both show low areal BMD on DXA(2). Magnetic Resonance
Imaging can provide true volumetric (3D)
measurements while completely avoiding exposure of the subject to ionizing
radiation. (3) Yet, the very short-T2s and broad resonances of 31P
and 1H in bone mineral and bone organic matrix make the MRI
measurements difficult.
Recently, a few MRI methods that address these
difficulties have been developed: (i) Ultra-short TE (UTE) imaging,(4)
(ii) Solid-state 31P (SMRI) imaging for bone mineral imaging, and water-
and fat-suppressed projection imaging (WASPI) for bone matrix (1H)
imaging (developed in our laboratory),(1,5) (iii) Zero echo time
(ZTE) imaging,(6) and (iv) Sweep imaging with Fourier transformation
(SWIFT).(7) In 3D UTE, SMRI, WASPI, and ZTE sequences, free
induction decays (FIDs) are acquired with non-selective RF excitation followed
by radial acquisition to detect short T2 signals. The purpose of this study was to acquire both 1H
and 31P images sequentially in the same session to compute bone
matrix and mineral densities from the same volume of interest to estimate the extent
of bone mineralization (EBM) accurately in pre-clinical setting. The ultimate goal of the study is to translate
the concept in the clinical setting to establish MRI as a non-invasive and
non-ionizing imaging modality to differentiate osteomalacia from osteoporosis
in humans
(1,8-10).
Methods: One set of three cylindrical
pellets of polyethylene glycol (PEG) mixed with silicon dioxide at 25%, 50%, and 100% PEG weight fraction
for 1H and a second set of three
cylindrical pellets of hydroxyapatite (HA) mixed with PEG at 25%, 50%
and 100% HA weight fraction for 31P and a dual
calibration phantom pellet of PEG and HA mixed in 1:1 weight fraction were
prepared for density calibrations. A double-tuned
single solenoid coil was built for the sequential
acquisition of 1H and 31P rat femur imaging. VAPOR saturation segment
was included in the 1H-ZTE for water+fat suppressions; the pulse
lengths and bandwidths in VAPOR were optimized for efficient suppression. Initially,
1H ZTE imaging was carried with water +fat suppression acquiring short T2
bone matrix signals with SW=250000Hz, TR=20ms,
No. of averages=8,
radial projections=13,030, FOV=30×30×30, and matrix size=64×64×64, resulting in
1H images in 50 minutes. Immediately after completing 1H
imaging, 31P ZTE imaging was started on the same rat femur with SW=200000Hz,
TR=1000ms, No. of averages=2, and the rest of the parameters were the same as 1H
acquisition, resulting in 31P images in 7 hours. The dual phantom was imaged in all 1H
and 31P rat femur experiments to serve as a calibration phantom. This
cycle of 1H and 31P imaging was repeated on control
(CTR), ovariectomized (OVX), and partially nephrectomized (NFR) groups of rat
femurs with optimized TR values from Ernst angle calculations because of the
extremely long 1H (9s)
and 31P
(67s)
T1s of rat femurs at 7T. 1H and 31P derived bone matrix and mineral image
densities were converted to PEG and HA equivalent mass densities (g.cm-3)
according to the linear
regression relationships. The
B1 field intensity variations
due to coil profiles were corrected with 1H/31P B1
maps obtained with homogeneous (Water/HA) phantoms. Additionally,
micro-CT and gold standard gravimetric analyses were conducted and compared with
the MRI derived bone matrix and mineral densities.
Results: Rat bone matrix and mineral densities were successfully
measured with ZTE imaging with 0.468mm resolution and SNR of 25-30 and 12-17 respectively.
A significant linear-relationship
was confirmed between MRI densities and physical densities of the three-density
PEG/HA phantoms with 3-point fit in Fig.1(a). The dual-phantom was used to convert the signal-intensity
in the bone image to density with conversion factors. Fig.1(b) shows 1H
(top-left row), 31P (top-right row) images and the bottom-row in
color shows the same slice 1H and 31P images. The EBM computed
by ZTE imaging is in good agreement with gravimetric analysis shown in Fig.1(c).
Discussion: The 1H/31P signals
acquired from the three-density 1H/31P pellets confirmed the linearity with their physical densities which
is a linear test exploited to compute bone matrix and mineral densities along
with dual phantom. The Dual phantom facilitated quantitative matrix and mineral densities in rat bones.
Optimization of matrix size, acquisition time, and bandwidth provided 1H/31P
rat bone images with optimum SNR and spatial resolution to compute matrix and
mineral densities. The double-tuned single solenoid coil with a better filling
factor and multiple advantages(8-10) and dual phantom are suitable for rat
femur imaging to measure matrix and mineral densities quantitatively.
Conclusion: 1H and
31P rat femur images were successfully acquired sequentially in the
same session for auto co-registration of the volume-of-interest to compute bone
matrix and mineral densities for estimating EBM accurately. Solid-state 1H
and 31P imaging were feasible on ex-vivo rat bone specimens
at 7T with the custom-designed RF coil and optimization of imaging parameters. We
expect that this method can be extended to humans to measure bone matrix and
mineral densities non-invasively. Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the National
Institutes of Health (AN: K99/R00 AR057093), and internal grants from
the Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at BIDMC (EKR) and Boston
Children’s Hospital Orthopaedic Surgery Foundation (BDS). MR Imaging was
supported by the Small Animal Imaging Facilities at Boston Children's Hospital
and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, MA. References
References:
1. Haihui Cao, et al., “Quantitative 31P NMRS and 1H MRI
measurements of bone mineral and matrix density in rat models” Bone, 2010, 46,
1582-1590.
2.
Yaotang
Wu, et al., “Water- and Fat-Suppressed Proton Projection MRI (WASPI) of Rat Femur
Bone” Magn.
Reson. Med., 2007, 57:554-567.
3. Yaotang
Wu, et al., “Bone Matrix Imaged In Vivo by WASPI MRI
of Animal and Human Subjects” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2010, 31:954-963.
4.
Robson MD, et al., “Magnetic resonance: an
introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2003;
27(6): 825–846.
5.
Wu Y et al., “Bone
Mineral Imaged In Vivo by 31P Solid State MRI of Human Wrists” J.
Magn. Reason. Imaging, 2011, 34, 623-633.
6.
Weiger
M, et al., “MRI with zero echo time:
hard versus sweep pulse excitation”. Magn. Reson. Med 2011;66:379–389
7.
Idiyatullin D et al., “Fast and quiet MRI using a
swept radiofrequency”. J Magn. Reson. 2006; 181:342–349
8. Victor Kassey, et
al. “Design
and Development of a Versatile Double Tuned R.F Probe
Head Coil for Quantification of Bone Mineral and Matrix, ORS 2018,
New Orleans.
9. Victor Kassey, et
al. “Bone Matrix Density of Rat
Bone with Water and Fat suppressed Solid State 1H ZTE MRI at 7T, ORS
2019, Austin, TX.
10.Victor Kassey, et
al. “Bone Mineral Density of Rat Bone with 31P ZTE MRI using
home-built MRI coil at 7T, ORS 2019, Austin, TX.