Isil Unal1, Duygu Dengiz2, Eckhard Quandt2, Mona Salehi Ravesh1, Jan-Bernd Hövener3, Mariya Pravdivtseva1, and Olav Jansen1
1Department for Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany, Kiel, Germany, 2Institute for Materials Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kiel, Germany., Kiel, Germany, 3Section Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), Kiel, Germany
Synopsis
Blood flow , which
is one of the factors leading to aneurysm rupture, can be measured in vivo by
4D flow MRI. In this study, the flow in 3D printed, patient-derived models was
measured in vitro. Elastic modulus of materials were investigated to mimic the
real brain arteries.
Introduction
A cerebral
aneurysm is a severe disease that leads to death in about 50 % of all cases
if a rupture occurs [1] and need to be identified and treated. Blood flow is the one of the most critical factors leading to aneurysm rupture [2]. It can
be detected in vivo using 4D flow MRI,
but there is no clear understanding yet which of the parameters such as
flow rate, pressure and wall shear stress are decisive. 3D models of aneurysms allow
to tests treatment strategies in vitro. The emerging technique of 3D
printing allows to produce patient derived models. The most commonly used printing
materials, however, are rigid and don’t mimic the elastic properties of the
vessel wall well. Thus our first goal is to measure flow rate in aneurysm model
with a rigid wall using 4D Flow MRI. Our second goal is to determine the
material that can mimic the brain arteries in order to examine the effect of
vascular wall elasticity on flow.Materials and Methods
We
investigated three kinds of commercially available material with different
shore and elasticity values claimed by the manufacturer as 'Rigid' (Clear 78D material-1), 'Flexible' (material-2), and 'Elastic' (material-3,) photoreactive resins (Formlabs, USA).
Determination
of elastic modulus
Samples
Rectangular samples of material-2 (“flexible
80A resin”, Formlabs, USA) and -3 (“elastic 50A resin) were
designed and printed with stereolitography (Fig. 1); Autodesk Inventor 2021,
Autodesk Inc., USA; Formlabs 3, Formlabs, USA) [3,4]. Because
stereolitographic models are printed layer-by-layer, the resolution differs
between layers. To investigate this effect, we printed the samples
at printing angle a = 0°, 45°
and 90° with respect to the printing platform (or printing layer). Three
samples were printed for each material and printing angle (18 in total).
Tensile test
Tensile
tests were performed in test machine (Zwick Roell Z05, Fürstenfeld, Austria) at
24 °C. The samples were and pulled until break (Fig. 2a). The force was
measured as function of the disposition/strain and fitted with a linear
function
y=m x a +b., where m is the
elastic modulus (Fig. 2b).
Flow
measurements
Patient-derived models of vasculature
3D image of flow model were obtained by in vivo from a patient with aneurysm and
data was processed, then used for 3D printing with material-1,-2
and -3 (Formlabs 3, Formlabs,
USA).
The models
were printed with three kinds of materials with different mechanical properties
claimed by the manufacturer as 'Rigid', 'Flexible' and
'Elastic' photoreactive resins (Fig. 3). Rigid model was referred ad material-1.
Experimental flow setup
The flow
models were placed in agarose gel and integrated in a flow loop filled with a glycerol-water
mixute (40/60 %) with 0.3 mmol/L
gadolinium-based contrast agent (Gadovist, Bayer Pharma AG, Germany) to
mimic the blood. The models were supplied with a pulsatile (cardiac) pump (5000 Hz PD-1100, BDC Laboratories, USA) and flow rate was 300 ml/min at 24 °C.
4D flow MRI
Flow measurements were performed on a 3 T clinical whole-body MRI (Ingenia CX,
5.6.1, Philips Healthcare, Netherlands) using a spoiled, T1-weighted turbo fast
gradient echo sequence (TR/TE = 8.5/5.1 ms, matrix: 528×528×80, voxel size: 1.5 mm³, field of view:
200.1×200.1 mm², number of heart phases: 20, temporal resolution: 50 ms, velocity
encoding parameter: 70 cm/s, number of slices: 133). The flow was measured at
the markers on the model. Flow was analysed with dedicated
software (GT Flow, 3.2.13, GyroTools, Switzerland). The magnitude and phase
difference images of 4D flow MRI were reconstructed on the MRI console. Results
Tensile test
Elastic moduluses of 18 samples were obtained from tensile test. Values of 12 samples were changing between 0.75 ± 0.29 MPa which
is the value of real artery in literature [5] as shown in Fig. 4.
4D Flow MRI
Flow was measured in model with material-1 has shown in Fig. 5a and net
flow rates at the markers were obtained in aneurysm models using 4D flow MRI
(Fig. 5b).Discussion
Results in tensile test showed that the printing angle was
effective on elastic modulus.The closest
samples to 0.75 MPa were those produced at an angle of 0°/material-2 and /material-3. As shown in Fig. 4, samples were in the
safety zone except the material-2 at 45° and 90°.
As a
result of 4D Flow MRI measurement of rigid model, average of net flow rates were in inlet and outlets 7.35, 1.38, 1.92 and 6.9 ml/s and 2.79 ml/s in aneurysm. Flow results obtained from the rigid model will be the reference. Thus, a realistic flow distribution will be obtained
taking into account the wall displacement caused by pulsatile flow.Conclusions
We found
two commercial resins which allowed to produce the
flow models with elastic properties close to the human vessel. The combination
of a more realistic model and 4D Flow MRI can facilitate the
understanding of aneurysmal flow formation after the treatment. Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial and
intellectual support by the Research Training Group "Materials4Brain"
(GRK2154; P2b, P2a)References
1.
Brain Aneurysm Statistcs and
Facts. Brain Aneurysm Foundation. https://www.bafound.org.
2.
Sforza D. M. et. al. Hemodynamics
of Cerebral Aneurysms, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics Volume 41, 90-107
(2009).
3.
Flexible 80 A Resin Data Sheet. https://www.formlabs.com
4.
Elastic 50 A Resin Data Sheet. https://www.formlabs.com
5.
Kamdaeng, T. et. al. Arterial
stiffness identification of the human carotid artery using the stress-strain
relationship in vivo, UltraSonics Volume 52/3, 402-411 (2012).