Huimin Mao1, Weiqiang Dou2, Xinyi Wang1, Xinyu Wang1, Kunjian Chen1, and Yu Guo1
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China, 2GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, P.R. China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
The
purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging characteristics of intracranial
large and small vessel diseases long after cranial irradiation. All
patients with small vessel diseases underwent
intracranial vessel wall imaging by 3D high resolution CUBE T1-weighted imaging
(HR-MRI) to detect large vessel diseases. All recruited patients were found
with intracranial small and large vessel diseases. Therefore, intracranial
vasculopathy is not a rare complication after cranial irradiation, even in
young patients. Patients after cranial irradiation should be followed up with
MR imaging including HR-MRI.
INTRODUCTION
Radiation-induced
neuropathy is commonly observed among oncological patients. Cranial irradiation
can affect the nervous tissue directly or indirectly by inducing intracranial
vasculopathy comprising of cerebral small and large vessel diseases. Recently,
small vessel diseases after cranial irradiation has attracted attention as an
important radiation-induced cerebrovascular disease1. Many cases of
intracranial large artery stenosis as late complications of radiotherapy were described
in previous studies2.
However,
few studies have focused on the evaluation of the characteristics of both small
and large vessel diseases long after cranial irradiation. Moreover, vessel wall
imaging features of radiation-induced intracranial large vessel diseases were
also seldom studied.
Therefore,
this study aimed to assess radiation-induced cerebral small vessel damages,
including microbleeds (MBs), lacunar infarctions (LI), or white matter
hyperintensities (WMH) by using conventional brain MRI and large vessel
diseases regarding vessel wall thickening and enhancement patterns by using 3D
high resolution CUBE T1-weighted imaging (HR-MRI).MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
We
included 7 patients (mean age: 57.7 years old, ranged from 44 to 76 years old),
who were found to have intracranial artery stenosis (>50%) at least 5 years
after radiation therapy for intracranial tumors. Each patient underwent
conventional brain MRI and HR-MRI.
MRI
experiments
All
experiments were performed on a 3T clinical scanner (Discovery 750w, GE
Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) equipped with a 32-channel coil. Conventional
brain MRI comprised of a complete set of T1W, T2W, FLAIR
imaging, susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and
magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA).
Both plain and enhanced
fast-spin-echo
based 3D T1-weighted CUBE technique was employed for each patient. The corresponding scan
parameters include: TR=600ms; TE=14.4ms; slice thickness=1mm; slice gap=0.5mm;
FOV=200mm×200mm for whole brain coverage; matrix size=288×288 and echo length
train=24. Gd-DTPA (0.1 mmol/kg) was administrated intravenously, and 3D CUBE T1-weighted
HR-MRI was repeated 2 minutes after contrast material administration. Total
scanning time was 8 minutes 32s.
Image analysis
All
brain images were reviewed by two experienced radiologists. MBs were identified
as small circular or ellipsoidal hypointense signals that were less than 10mm
in maximum diameter on SWI. LI were defined as parenchymal defects ≤15mm in
diameter in the regions of perforating arteries; they were hyperintense on
FLAIR imaging or T2W or hypointense on T1W. WMH were
identified as periventricular, peri-lesion or deep white matter
hyperintensities on FLAIR imaging or T2W.
Eccentric
wall thickening on HR-MRI was defined as the eccentricity index was ≥0.5, while
for concentric thickening, this index
was<0.5. The eccentricity index calculated
by the formula: {(maximal thickness-minimal thickness)/maximal
thickness}. The pattern of enhancement was rated as focal or circle enhancement.
The degree of enhancement was categorized as none (equivalent to normal wall),
moderate (less than the infundibulum enhancement), prominent (greater than the
infundibulum enhancement). Train track sign was defined as complete vessel wall
enhancement like parallel train track. Both radiologists were asked to assess
the whole intracranial artery segments.
Data
analysis
For
categorical variables, the Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to assess the
inter-observer agreement between both radiologists. Statistical analyses were
performed with SPSS 22.0 version software.RESULTS
In
this study, the Cohen’s kappa coefficient was separately applied to estimate
the inter-agreement of conventional brain MRI and HRMRI between two
radiologists. High Kappa values were obtained for T1W(0.935)、T2W(0.941)、FLAIR
imaging(0.922)、SWI(0.912) and HR-MRI(0.901) .
MBs
were detected in 6 of 7 patients (85.7%). Among them, MBs in one patient
located all over the brain. WMH were detected in 6 patients and the number of
LI were 6 in two patients. These imaging features strongly suggest small vessel
damages.
Seventeen
lesions of intracranial artery segments which comprised of five luminal
occlusive lesions and twelve luminal stenotic lesions were observed on HR-MRI.
Among twelve intracranial stenotic lesions, seven lesions had an appearance of
concentric wall thickening, three were eccentric wall thickening, one had an
appearance consistent with intraluminal thrombus, and one was normal on
pre-contrast T1W HR-MRI. Three of the seven lesions with concentric wall
thickening didn’t show arterial wall enhancement on post-contrast HR-MRI,
whereas the remaining four lesions had prominent circle enhancement,
corresponding with train track sign, indicating arteritis. All three lesions with
eccentric wall thickening had an appearance, being consistent with focal
enhancement of the arterial wall on post-contrast HR-MRI, suggesting
atherosclerosis.DISCUSSION
In this study, all 7 patients were found with intracranial small and large vessel diseases. Two mechanisms of irradiation-induced vascular damages have been proposed: One is the acceleration of atherosclerosis, which mainly results in intimal thickness, and the other is endothelial cell injury of large and small vessels3. Blood-brain-barrier disruption in capillaries due to the vulnerability of endothelial cells to radiation injury may be responsible for multiple microbleeds. In addition, the damaged endothelial cells of large arteries cannot guard against plasma lipoproteins, allowing lipid infiltration and subsequent intimal plaque formations, gradually presenting as vulnerable plaques4.CONCLUSION
In
conclusion, both cerebral small and large vessel diseases existed in patients
long after cranial irradiation. Intracranial vasculopathy is not a rare
complication after cranial irradiation, even in young patients. Patients after
cranial irradiation should be followed up with MR imaging including HR-MRI.Acknowledgements
We thank Weiqiang Dou from GE Healthcare for this valuable support on the 3D-CUBE T1 vessel wall sequence.References
1. Miura
M, Nakajima M, Fujimoto A, Ueda A, Watanabe M, Ando Y. Rinsho Shinkeigaku.
2015;55(10):743-747.
2. Nordstrom
M, Felton E, Sear K, et al. Large Vessel Arteriopathy After Cranial Radiation
Therapy in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors. J Child Neurol. 2018;33(5):359-366.
3. Plummer
C, Henderson RD, O'Sullivan JD, Read SJ. Ischemic stroke and transient ischemic
attack after head and neck radiotherapy: a review. Stroke.
2011;42(9):2410-2418.
4. Grenier
Y, Tomita T, Marymont MH, Byrd S, Burrowes DM. Late postirradiation occlusive
vasculopathy in childhood medulloblastoma. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg.
1998;89(3):460-464.