Sydney Sherman1,2 and Michael Cima2,3
1Health Science and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States, 2Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA, United States, 3Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
A
low-field portable MR-based sensor was designed for the acquisition of clinical
T2 relaxometry measurements in skeletal muscle. A range of low-field permanent
magnet array configurations were modeled with varying sensitive region depths
and homogeneous volumes; an optimization score for each design was calculated. The
optimal design has a sensitive region 15-20mm from the surface of the magnet,
making it capable of acquiring measurements deep into the leg such that the
measurement is fully localized to skeletal muscle. The exclusion of
subcutaneous fat tissue in the sensitive region will improve sensitivity to
fluid shifts within the skeletal muscle.
Background
Worldwide there are over 2.5
million patients with end stage kidney disease who depend on life-sustaining
dialysis treatments. The intermittent nature of dialysis exposes patients to
wide variations between fluid overload on non-dialysis days and fluid depletion
after hemodialysis sessions1. Fluid overload has been linked with
cardiovascular events and mortality2,3. Fluid depletion results in
intradialytic hypotension, which occurs in up to 75% of hemodialysis patients
and can cause nausea, vomiting, and cramping. Long-term volume overload and
poorly managed ultrafiltration rates are also common4,5. There is
currently no quantitative standard for fluid assessment that informs
physicians or patients of their volemic status. An adequate assessment of fluid
state in routine clinical practice is, therefore, an unmet need. There
is no gold standard measurement for assessment of fluid volume status6.
Methods for quantification of fluid status are known to have clinically
relevant limitations7. We aim
to establish the magnetic resonance (MR) based measurement as a rapid
quantitative method for fluid assessment. We have developed a portable,
single-sided MR sensor to collect relaxometry metrics from skeletal muscle,
where excess fluid accumulates.
We designed a portable single-sided MR relaxometer
(SSR) that was tested in a dialysis patient study. Localized T2 relaxometry measurements
were acquired from the lower leg of participants. Clinical MRI was able to able
to detect differences between hyper- and hypo- volemic patients from lower leg
skeletal muscle [FIG 1], but the SSR was unable to distinguish between those
groups. SSR measurements did show statistically significant changes for each
patient before and after hemodialysis. The
SSR used in the study was designed with permanent magnets to have a
static B0 magnetic field of 0.27 T. The magnet array is a Unilateral Linear
Halbach design which is well suited for point of care settings because the
magnetic field is limited to one side of the array. The sensitive saddle region
of this sweet spot magnet is 2-7 mm from the surface of the magnet. Physically,
this region includes both muscle and subcutaneous fat compartments when placed
against a patient’s leg. The inclusion of subcutaneous fat in the measurement
confounds the signal from the interstitial muscle space8 [Fig 2]. The
purpose of this work is to design a portable permanent magnet sensor capable of
acquiring signal from only the skeletal muscle of a leg and sufficiently
sensitive enough to be used for clinical measurements.Methods
The
permanent magnet array was designed from ½” cube N-52 neodymium magnets for
ease of modular fabrication9. The Unilateral Linear Halbach array
and Cylindrical Halbach array magnet configurations are the basis for the
design. These configurations allow for a sweet-spot homogeneous region above
the surface of the magnet with few stray fields. Variations of magnet configurations,
geometries, number of magnets in the x, y, and z directions and orientations of
magnetization were explored. Finite element analysis was performed using COMSOL
Multiphysics software to simulate the magnetic field for each design variation to
identify the most robust sensor design to enable measurement of the muscle
compartment. The design metric described in Greer et al.10 was used
to determine optimal configuration that met the sweet spot depth requirements. This
optimization score is shown in Equation 1 where G0 is static gradient, RMSE is the
root mean square error of B0 field. $$Equation \ 1) \ \ \ Optimization\ Score = \frac{B_{0}^{7/4}}{RMSE * G_{0}}$$Results
A
range of low-field permanent magnet array configurations were modeled in COMSOL
with varying sensitive region depths and homogeneous areas, the optimization
score for each design was calculated [Fig 3]. The design with the highest
optimization score has a sensitive region 15-20mm from the surface of the
magnet, making it capable of acquiring measurements deep into the leg such that
the measurement is fully localized to skeletal muscle. The curved magnet
geometry allows for a range of anatomic areas or tissue sample sizes to be
placed in the sensitive region [Fig 4], and makes it more adaptable for
patients with different body compositions. The sensitive region is defined by B0
field variation of less than 1%. The designed sensor can acquire data from a voxel
size of 5cm3, over 50 times larger than the single-sided sensor used
in the preliminary trial.Discussion
A
low-field portable MR-based sensor was designed for the acquisition of clinical
T2 relaxometry measurements in skeletal muscle. The exclusion of subcutaneous fat
tissue in the sensitive region will improve sensitivity to fluid shifts within
the skeletal muscle. The magnet is designed to seat the calf muscle, allowing
for measurements deeper into the tissue, and reducing variability due to leg
placement against a flat surface. Following fabrication, the sensor the B0
field will be mapped and the Shinnar-Le Roux algorithm will be used to design a
B1 with a 50kHz bandwidth. The use of adiabatic pulses will allow
for signal acquisition from a larger voxel size, which serves to increase the
confidence in the clinical measurement of volumetric status in the tissue. This
portable low-field magnet design will enable clinical assessment of fluid
status without the need for full-scale clinical MRI imaging.Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Matthew Rosen, Dr. Jason Stockmann, Chris Frangieh, and Ashvin Bashyam for helpful discussions and guidance.References
[1] Hecking M, Karaboyas A, Antlanger M, Saran R, Wizemann V,
Chazot C, et al. Significance of interdialytic weight gain versus chronic
volume overload: consensus opinion. Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(1):78–90
[2] Kalantar-Zadeh K, Regidor DL, Kovesdy CP, Van Wyck D,
Bun- napradist S, Horwich TB, et al.: Fluid retention is associated with car-
diovascular mortality in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis.
Circulation 119:671–679, 2009
[3] Wizemann V, Wabel P, Chamney P, Zaluska W, Moissl U, Rode
C, et al.: The mortality risk of overhydration in haemodialysis patients.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:1574–1579, 2009
[4] J.Q. Jaeger, R.L. Mehta, Assessment of dry weight in
hemodialysis an overview, J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10 (1999) 392–403.
[5] J.E. Flythe, S.E. Kimmel, S.M. Brunelli, Rapid fluid
removal during dialysis is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality,
Kidney Int. 79 (2011) 250–257.
[6] S. Ishibe, A.J.
Peixoto, Methods of Assessment of Volume Status and Intercompartmental Fluid
Shifts in Hemodialysis Patients: Implications in Clinical Practice, in: Semin.
Dial., Wiley Online Library, 2004: pp. 37–43.
doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2004.17112.x.
[7] S. McGee, W.B. Abernethy III, D.L. Simel, Is this patient
hypovolemic?, Jama. 281 (1999) 1022–1029.
[8] L.Colucci, K. Corapi, M. Li, X. Parada, A Allegretti, H
Lin, D. Ausiello, M. Rosen, M.J. Cima, Fluid assessment in dialysis patients by
point-of-care magnetic relaxometry; Science Translational Medicine, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau1749,
Vol 11, Issue 502, 2019/07/24
[9] A. Bashyam, M. Li,
M.J. Cima, Design and experimental validation of Unilateral Linear Halbach
magnet arrays for singlesided magnetic resonance, J. Magn. Reson. (2018).
[10] M. Greer, C.Chen, S. Mandal, An easily reproducible,
hand-held, single-sided, MRI sensor, Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2019. Vol
308. ISSN 1090-7807.