Sophie M. Peereboom1, Christian Guenthner1, Mohammed M. Albannay1, and Sebastian Kozerke1
1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Synopsis
Proton
MR spectroscopy can assess cardiac triglyceride levels. Although spectral
separation and thermal polarization decrease at lower field strength, increased
T2* and T2 values, decreased T1
values, decreased echo times and the possibility to decrease receiver bandwidth
are clear advantages compared to higher fields. In this work the feasibility of
in vivo skeletal muscle and cardiac proton spectroscopy at 0.75T is
demonstrated. For this purpose, a clinical 3T Philips Achieva scanner was
ramped down to a field strength of 0.75T. Results are compared to spectra
acquired at 1.5T and 3T and simulations confirm experimental findings.
Introduction
Proton MR spectroscopy has shown promising
evidence to assess cardiac metabolism1. At the moment this is commonly performed at
1.5T or 3T. Higher field strengths have the advantage of higher thermal
polarization and a larger peak separation for spectroscopy. This comes, however,
at the expense of larger field inhomogeneities, higher SAR levels and increased
ECG interference. Lower field strengths can benefit from lower SAR levels and
therefore shorter RF pulse lengths and echo times2, which can together with increased T2
and decreased T1 values3–5 lead to an increase in signal. A more
homogeneous field and therefore higher T2* values might
compensate for the decrease in spectral separation at lower fields.
The aim of the present work was to investigate
the feasibility of 1H-MRS for the assessment of triglyceride levels
in human calf muscle and myocardium at a custom 0.75T scanner and compare this
to measurements at 1.5T and 3T.Methods
A 3T Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best,
the Netherlands) was ramped down to a field strength of 0.75T. A custom-made 4-channel
transmit/receive coil array (Clinical MR Solutions, Shadybrook, WI, USA)
(Figure 1), which was originally made to sample on the 13C frequency
at 3T, was tuned to the 1H frequency at 0.75T. Reference
measurements were performed at both a 1.5T Philips Achieva scanner using a
five-channel cardiac receiver array and at another 3T Philips Achieva scanner
using a two-channel Flex-L coil.
Measurements were performed in both the calf
muscle and the interventricular septum of 3 healthy volunteers. Spectra were
acquired with a voxel size of 10×20×40 mm3; pencil-beam volume
shimming and local power optimization6 were performed prior. TE ranged from 15 ms at
0.75T to 26 ms at 3T with a TR of 2000 ms. CHESS based water suppression was
performed; the number of water-suppressed averages was 96 for calf muscle and 192
for myocardium. Spectral bandwidth in the leg was 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz
at 0.75T, 1.5T and 3T respectively, and 2000 Hz in the heart for all field
strengths (1024 samples). Cardiac measurements were ECG-triggered to end
systole and respiratory gating was applied (window = 4 mm). Scan times were
identical at all field strengths. Additionally, series with different echo
times (range = 15-400 ms, 11 steps) and repetition times (range = 375-5000 ms,
9 steps) were acquired for the water-unsuppressed signal (NSA = 16) of the calf
muscle.
All spectra were reconstructed in MATLAB using
a customized reconstruction pipeline. Spectra were fitted with Lorentzian line
shapes in the time-domain using AMARES (jMRUI, version 5.2)7. T1 was acquired by fitting the
data from the TR series according to $$$M_z=M_0\left(1-c\left(e^{-\frac{TR}{T_1}}\right)\right)$$$,
the TE series were fitted with $$$M_{xy}=M_0\left(e^{-\frac{TE}{T_2}}\right)$$$ and T2* was calculated
based on linewidth of the water peaks according to $$$fwhm=\frac{1}{\pi T_{2}^{*}}$$$.
T1, T2 and T2* were fitted as a
function of magnetic field according to $$$T=a\left(B_0\right)^b$$$.
Spectra
consisting of TMA, CR, TG-CH2- and TG-CH3 were simulated
using Bloch equations for field strengths of 0.75T, 1.5T and 3T. Realistic
metabolite SNR values were assumed for 1.5T; SNR at 0.75T and 3T was calculated
based on these values and an SNR simulation based on first principles. ΔB0
was calculated for each field strength based on the measured T2*
of water in the septum; this was used to calculate T2*
values of the separate metabolites and define linewidths.Results
Exemplary
spectra acquired from the soleus muscle from one volunteer at 0.75T, 1.5T and
3T are shown in Figure 2. Both triglycerides and creatine can be clearly
distinguished in all three spectra. In Figure 3 the T1,
T2 and T2* dependencies on field strength for
the water signal of in vivo calf muscle are presented. T1 increases
with increasing field strength, whereas both T2 and T2*
decrease. Figure
4 compares exemplary spectra acquired in the interventricular septum of one
subject at different field strengths. Even though peak separation
decreases for lower field strengths, both TG and CR can be detected at 0.75T. Figure
5 shows T2* of myocardial water fitted as a function of
magnetic field strength. This corresponds with linewidths of 6.22±0.74 Hz (0.75T), 8.40±0.51
Hz (1.5T) and 12.65±1.57 Hz (3T). Simulated spectra for different
field strengths based on these T2* values, physiological
metabolite relaxation parameters and realistic SNR values show that creatine
can still be distinguished from TMA at 0.75T.Discussion
Although peak separation is reduced at low
field, prolonged T2* makes
spectral quality adequate to distinguish relevant metabolites. Decreased T1
values, increased T2 values, decreased echo times and the
possibility to decrease receiver bandwidth can all lead to an increase in
signal and are therefore clear advantages of lower fields. Chemical shift
artefacts increase as a function of magnetic field strength, leading to better
spatial localization at lower field strengths.
The
absence of a body coil for RF transmission at 0.75T was a limitation in this
study; B1 power optimization was therefore challenging and the B1+
field was inhomogeneous. Local power optimization could, however, be performed
for the spectroscopic measurements.Conclusion
Both
measurements and simulations using first principles indicate that human in vivo
proton spectroscopy in skeletal muscle and in the heart is achievable at 0.75T.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. van Ewijk PA,
Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Bekkers SCAM, Glatz JFC, Wildberger JE, Kooi ME. MRS:
a noninvasive window into cardiac metabolism. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:747–766.
2. Marques JP, Simonis
FFJ, Webb AG. Low-Field MRI: An MR Physics Perspective. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging
2019;49:1528–1542.
3. Bottomley PA,
Foster TH, Argersinger RE, Pfeifer LM. A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR
relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: Dependence on tissue
type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Med. Phys.
1984;11:425–448.
4. Campbell-Washburn
AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, et al. Opportunities in Interventional and
Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-performance Low-Field-Strength MRI. Radiology
2019;293:384–393.
5. Krššák M, Lindeboom
L, Schrauwen-Hinderling V, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in
skeletal muscle: Experts’ consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2020;e4266.
6. de Heer P, Bizino
MB, Lamb HJ, Webb AG. Parameter Optimization for Reproducible Cardiac 1H-MR
Spectroscopy at 3 Tesla. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1151–1158.
7. Vanhamme L, van den Boogaart A, Van Huffel S. Improved
Method for Accurate and Efficient Quantification of MRS Data with Use of Prior
Knowledge. J. Magn. Reson. 1997;129:35–43.