Jian Shen1, Aart Nederveen2, and John Wood1,3
1Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
Brain oxygenation can be measured
using either T2-based methods or magnetic susceptibility-based methods. This study
validates QSM and CISSCO methods in measuring the oxygenation in the internal
cerebral vein and compares the results in sickle cell disease patients, anemia
subjects with normal hemoglobin and healthy controls. Both methods reveal the group difference in the oxygen saturation in the deep structures. The limitations for both methods are discussed and the explanation for the bias between the two methods is provided.
Introduction
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is caused by a
single amino acid mutation in hemoglobin, causing chronic hemolytic anemia and
neurovascular complications.1 Imaging of brain oxygenation in deep cerebral
veins could be a powerful tool to the balance between oxygen supply and demand
in the deep structures. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) uses deconvolution of
the magnetic dipole from magnetic field (B0) images to quantify the
magnetic susceptibility shift between venous blood and background tissue and the susceptibility difference is converted to estimated venous oxygenation.2 Alternatively, a method called CISSCO
(Complex Image Summation around a Spherical or a Cylindrical Object) was introduced
to quantify susceptibility in narrow cylindrical objects.3 In this study, our goal was to validate
venous oxygen saturation measured by QSM and CISSCO in the internal cerebral
vein (ICV) in SCD patients, anemia subjects with normal hemoglobin and healthy
controls.Methods
Demographics: 16 SCD patients, 7 non-sickle anemia patients
and 11 healthy controls participated in the study (Table 1).
MR acquisition: Images were acquired on a clinical 3 T
Philips system and the 3D gradient echo sequence had
parameters: TR = 30 ms, α = 25°, 2 echoes: TE1 = 4.94 ms, ΔTE = 5.2 ms, FOV =
210 x 190 x 120 mm3, spatial resolution: 0.6 x 0.6 x 1.3 mm3,
SENSE factor = 2 and total acquisition time = 6 mins 50 s.
QSM:
For each subject, phase images were fitted to generate a B0
field map. Brain extraction and phase unwrapping was performed using FSL.4
Background field was removed using projection onto dipole fields (PDF).5
Unreliable phase voxels were identified6 and removed from the brain
mask for subsequent processing. L1-regularized field-to-susceptibility
inversion was performed to derive the susceptibility map ($$$\lambda$$$=4×10-4).7
Venous oxygen saturation was computed based on:
$$\chi=(1-SvO_2)\chi_{d-o}Hct+\chi_{o-w}Hct$$
where $$$\chi$$$ is the susceptibility measurement of
the ICV, $$$\chi_{d-o}$$$ is the susceptibility shift per unit
hematocrit between fully oxygenated and fully deoxygenated erythrocytes, and $$$\chi_{o-w}$$$ is the susceptibility shift between oxygenated
blood cells and water. Values of 0.27 ppm and -0.03 ppm were used
for and.8
The ROI mask of the ICV was manually selected based on the susceptibility map
that was threshold at 0.1 ppm to avoid partial-volume effect.
CISSCO:
This method integrates the complex MR signals in three annuli around the
cylinder of interest. The complex sums are cast into equations containing three
unknown parameters, the susceptibility and radius of the cylinder, and the proton spin density. If the radius of a
cylindrical object is a, the overall MR complex signal S within a coaxial
cylinder with radius R is
$$S=\pi l\rho_0\vartheta\int_{\vartheta/R^2}^{g'} \frac{dx}{x^2}J_0(x)+\pi la^2\rho_{0,c}e^{i\varphi_{in}}$$
where $$$\varphi_{in} = -\gamma \frac{\Delta \chi}{6}(3cos^2\theta-1)B_0T_E$$$, $$$\Delta \chi$$$ is the susceptibility difference between tissues inside
and outside, l is the slice thickness, $$$\rho_0$$$ and $$$\rho_{0,c}$$$ are the effective spin densities of the tissue
outside and inside the object, $$$\vartheta$$$ is the effective magnetic moment, g' is the extremum phase value the surface of the
object. After applying the equation to three coaxial
cylinders, $$$\vartheta$$$, $$$\rho_0$$$ and $$$\Delta \chi$$$ can be solved sequentially. Results
Figure 1 shows representative magnitude and
phase images, the processed susceptibility map by QSM, and the internal
cerebral vein. Mean ICV oxygen saturation measured by QSM in the three groups
are 73.9% in CTL, 73.6% in ACTL, and SCD 69.3%, p<0.05 by analysis of
variance. The mean ICV oxygen saturation measured by CISSCO are 67.0% in CTL,
64.9% in ACTL and 57.7% in SCD (p<0.05). There exists bias between these two
methods and the Bland-Altman analysis is shown in Figure 2. The relationship
between oxygen saturation and hemoglobin is shown in Figure 3. Both methods
indicate that SCD patients have lower oxygen saturation in deep regions
compared with healthy controls. Figure 4 shows the opposite correlation between
oxygen saturation and hemoglobin in ICV revealed by CISSCO and in sagittal
sinus measured by TRUST.9Discussion
There are some limitations for QSM. Partial-voluming effect causes
susceptibility to be underestimated10, particularly in small vessels
like the internal cerebral vein. And QSM estimates of vein saturation are
impacted by nonlinear phase accrual in moving spins.11 We postulate
that the two effects are responsible for the systemic bias between QSM
and CISSCO oximetry in these patients. CISSCO overcomes these limitations by
avoiding unstable dipole inversion and by inferring vessel susceptibility from
its effect on surrounding tissue rather than from the blood itself. However,
two major independent noise sources might introduce some bias in the quantified
results, including the Gaussian noise and the systematic noise due to discrete
pixels and Gibbs ringing.12 One other practical issue is that the chosen radii that
are too small suffer from Gibbs ringing, and the ones too large have
inadequate SNR.12
From a physiological perspective, both methods
reveal that ICV oxygen saturation is lower for SCD patients compared with
healthy controls, with saturation proportional to hemoglobin. However, this is completely opposite to venous
saturation in the sagittal sinus. Chronic anemia begets increased oxygen
saturation in the sagittal sinus measured by TRUST and this paradoxical observation has been attributed to cortical steal.13
Our data suggests that this “physiologic
shunting” favors gray matter perfusion, at the expense of deep white matter
structures. Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Heart
Lung and Blood Institute (1RO1HL136484-A1, 1U01HL117718-01), the National
Institutes of Health (1R01-NS074980), the National Institute of Clinical
Research Resources (UL1 TR001855-02) and by research support in kind from
Philips Healthcare.References
1. Ohene-Frempong,
Kwaku, et al. "Cerebrovascular accidents in sickle cell disease: rates and
risk factors." Blood, The Journal of the American Society of
Hematology 91.1 (1998): 288-294.
2. Wang,
Yi, and Tian Liu. "Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI
data for a tissue magnetic biomarker." Magnetic resonance in
medicine 73.1 (2015): 82-101.
3. Hsieh,
Ching-Yi, et al. "Susceptibility and size quantification of small human
veins from an MRI method." Magnetic resonance imaging 33.10
(2015): 1191-1204.
4. Smith,
Stephen M., et al. "Advances in functional and structural MR image
analysis and implementation as FSL." Neuroimage 23
(2004): S208-S219.
5. Liu,
Tian, et al. "A novel background field removal method for MRI using
projection onto dipole fields." NMR in Biomedicine 24.9 (2011):
1129-1136.
6. Schweser,
Ferdinand, et al. "Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue
properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron
metabolism?." Neuroimage 54.4 (2011): 2789-2807.
7. Bilgic,
Berkin, et al. "MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging
using quantitative susceptibility mapping." Neuroimage 59.3
(2012): 2625-2635.
8. Spees,
William M., et al. "Water proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5
Tesla: Magnetic susceptibility, T1, T2, T, and nonāLorentzian signal
behavior." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of
the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 45.4
(2001): 533-542.
9. Lu,
Hanzhang, et al. "Calibration and validation of TRUST MRI for the
estimation of cerebral blood oxygenation." Magnetic resonance in
medicine 67.1 (2012): 42-49.
10 Haacke,
E. M., et al. "Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and
quantify oxygen saturation." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 32.3
(2010): 663-676.
11 Betts,
Matthew J., et al. "High-resolution characterisation of the aging brain
using simultaneous quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2*
measurements at 7 T." Neuroimage 138 (2016): 43-63.
12 Hsieh,
Ching-Yi, et al. "An improved method for susceptibility and radius
quantification of cylindrical objects from MRI." Magnetic
resonance imaging 33.4 (2015): 420-436.
13 Bush, Adam M.,
Thomas D. Coates, and John C. Wood. "Diminished cerebral oxygen extraction
and metabolic rate in sickle cell disease using T2 relaxation under spin
tagging MRI." Magnetic resonance in medicine 80.1 (2018):
294-303.