3968

Magnetic susceptibility source separation: validation with Monte-Carlo simulation & application to human brain with histological comparison
Hyeong-Geol Shin1, Young Hyun Yun2, Seong Ho Yoo2, Sehoon Jung3, Sunhye Kim3, Hyung Jin Choi 2, and Jongho Lee1
1Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea, Republic of

Synopsis

We validate the magnetic susceptibility source separation method, which is recently proposed to separate paramagnetic (e.g., iron) and diamagnetic sources (e.g., myelin), by performing Monte-Carlo simulation. Then, the method is applied to ex-vivo and in-vivo human brains and compared to histology. In the simulation, we show the method successfully estimates the paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility concentrations. When compared to histology, the ex-vivo and in-vivo results demonstrated that the positive and negative susceptibility maps from the method highly correspond to the iron and myelin distributions, respectively, proving its feasibility as a tool to map iron and myelin distributions in the brain.

Introduction

$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$Recently, the magnetic susceptibility source separation method or 𝜒-separation was proposed to estimate the individual concentration of positive ($$$\chi_{pos}$$$) and negative susceptibility ($$$\chi_{neg}$$$)1. This method potentially enables to quantify two dominant susceptibility contributors in the brain, iron and myelin. In this work, we validate the 𝜒-separation model using Monte-Carlo simulation and test its capability to image iron and myelin by applying the method to ex-vivo and in-vivo brains and comparing the results with iron and myelin histology.

Methods

$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$[𝜒-separation model] The frequency shift from the positive and negative susceptibility sources is modeled as follows2:$$\Delta{f}=D_{f}\,(r)\,{*}\,(\,{\chi_{pos}}\,+\,{\chi_{neg}}\,)\,\,\,\,\,\,\,[Eq. 1]$$where $$$D_{f}$$$ denotes the magnetic dipole kernel. For the reversible transverse relaxation rate (i.e., R2'=R2*-R2), the susceptibility sources can be modeled as follows1,3:$$R_2'=D_{pos}\cdot{\lvert}{\chi_{pos}}{\rvert}+D_{neg}\cdot{\lvert}{\chi_{neg}}{\rvert}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,[Eq. 2]$$where $$$D_{pos}$$$ and $$$D_{neg}$$$ are the proportionality constants between R2' vs. positive and negative susceptibility, respectively. By exploiting both Eq. 1 and 2, the individual positive and negative susceptibility can be separately estimated4.
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$[Monte-Carlo simulation] Diffusion simulation with spherical susceptibility sources randomly distributed inside virtual cylinder was performed using the following parameters: matrix size=26 × 26 × 32, cylinder radius=4 voxels, diffusion coefficient=1 μm2/ms, source radius=1 μm, source susceptibility=520 ppm5, time step=100 μm, number of spins per voxel=400,000, and field strength=3T. Nine simulations were conducted with different susceptibility concentrations (12.5:12.5:37.5 ppb) and susceptibility compositions (positive-source-only, negative-source-only, and mixed-source) as visualized in Fig. 2a-b. $$$D_{pos}$$$ and $$$D_{neg}$$$ were estimated as the slope of R2' values with respect to absolute QSM values in the positive-source-only and negative-source-only cylinders, respectively.
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$[Ex-vivo experiment] A paraformaldehyde-fixed ex-vivo brain specimen containing primary visual cortex was scanned at 7T. For R2* and frequency shift, multi-echo gradient-echo data were acquired using the following parameters: resolution=0.3 × 0.3 × 0.5 mm3, TR=300 ms, TE=3.9:6.5:39.8 ms, flip angle=45°, two averages, and scan time=4.8 h. For R2, multi-echo spin-echo data were collected using the following protocols: resolution=0.3 × 0.3 × 0.5 mm3, TR=450 ms, TE=14:14:70 ms, three averages, and scan time=10.6 h. The paraffin-embedded sections of the specimen were utilized for myelin staining using Luxol fast blue (LFB) and iron quantification using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). The proportionality constants of in-vivo volunteers (see next section) were utilized after scaling for field strength.
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$[In-vivo experiment] Six volunteers were scanned at 3T MRI. Multi-echo gradient-echo data were acquired using the following protocols: resolution=1 × 1 × 2 mm3, TR=64 ms, TE=2.9:4.6:25.9 ms, flip angle=22°, and scan time=7 min. 2D multi-echo spin-echo data were collected using the following parameters: resolution=1 × 1 mm2, slice thickness=2 mm, TR=3860 ms, TE=15:15:90 ms, and scan time=12.4 min. To consider source characteristics of the human brain different with the simulation (see Discussion), $$$D_{pos}$$$ was estimated in five deep gray matter regions (putamen, globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, red nucleus, and substantia nigra), which primarily have positive susceptibility. For $$$D_{neg}$$$, the same value as $$$D_{pos}$$$ was used.

Results

$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$To validate susceptibility models of 𝜒-separation (i.e., Eqs. 1 and 2), the frequency shift and R2' maps from the simulation are compared to those generated by Eqs. 1 and 2 (Fig. 1). The simulated frequency shift and R2' maps demonstrate strong correlations with the model predictions (voxel-wise linear regression: R2>0.99). The quantitative comparison results also support the model validity (Fig. 1e-f).
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$When the positive and negative susceptibility values from 𝜒-separation are compared to the assigned values in single-source-only cylinders (i.e., first-row and second-row cylinders) and mixed-source cylinders (i.e., third-row cylinders), strong correlations are observed (Fig. 2; linear regression slope=0.99 and R2=1.00), demonstrating successful separation of the sources.
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$For the ex-vivo specimen, the positive and negative susceptibility maps reveal great similarities with histologically-obtained iron and myelin images (Fig. 3), despite the complex microstructural environment of the brain. In the middle layer of the cortex, distinct hyperintensities are observed in both positive and negative susceptibility maps, revealing stria of Gennari, which is known to have higher iron and myelin concentration than other layers6. The same characteristics are also captured in iron and myelin images (Fig. 3e-f). Additionally, the 𝜒-separation maps delineate anatomical structures of white matter (optic radiation, stratum sagittale internum, and forceps), which are observable in the histological images.
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$The in-vivo 𝜒-separation maps render well-known characteristics of iron and myelin distribution, suggesting the potential of the method for in-vivo iron and myelin mapping (Fig. 4). When the maps are zoomed-in and compared to histological images from literature7–9, the subtle details of iron and myelin are delineated in the positive and negative susceptibility maps, respectively (Fig. 5).

Discussion

$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$The proportionality constants ($$$D_{pos}$$$ and $$$D_{neg}$$$ ) can be influenced by the characteristics of susceptibility sources (size, geometry, and characteristic frequency of the sources)10–12. Despite the difference in the proportionality constants (simulation: 321 Hz/ppm vs. in-vivo: 137 Hz/ppm), the successful delineation of histological iron and myelin distributions in both ex-vivo and in-vivo brains may indicate that the in-vivo proportionality constant may reflect in-vivo brain characteristics.

Concusion

$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$The 𝜒-separation successfully reconstruct the positive and negative susceptibility in the Monte-Carlo simulation and, furthermore, delineate the exquisite details of iron and myelin distributions not only in the ex-vivo brain specimen but also in the in-vivo brain, suggesting the feasibility of iron and myelin mapping using 𝜒-separation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National ResearchFoundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2018R1A2B3008445)

References

1. J. Lee, Y. Nam, J. Y. Choi, H.-G. Shin, T. Hwang, J. Lee, in Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 25th annual meeting (2017), 0751.

2. R. Salomir, B. D. de Senneville, C. T. Moonen, Concepts Magnetic Reson Part B Magnetic Reson Eng, in press, doi:10.1002/cmr.b.10083.

3. D. A. Yablonskiy, E. M. Haacke, Magnet Reson Med, in press, doi:10.1002/mrm.1910320610.

4. H.-G. Shin, J. Lee, Y. H. Yun, S. H. Yoo, J. Jang, S.-H. Oh, Y. Nam, S. Jung, S. Kim, M. Fukunaga, W. Kim, H. J. Choi, J. Lee, Biorxiv, in press, doi:10.1101/2020.11.07.363796.

5. J. F. Schenck, The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 23, 815–850 (1996).

6. M. Fukunaga, T.-Q. Li, P. van Gelderen, J. A. de Zwart, K. Shmueli, B. Yao, J. Lee, D. Maric, M. A. Aronova, G. Zhang, R. D. Leapman, J. F. Schenck, H. Merkle, J. H. Duyn, Layer-specific variation of iron content in cerebral cortex as a source of MRI contrast. Proc National Acad Sci. 107, 3834–3839 (2010).

7. G. Schaltenbrand, W. Wahren, Atlas for stereotaxy of the human brain (Thieme, Stuttgart, ed. 2d, rev., 1977).

8. B. Drayer, P. Burger, R. Darwin, S. Riederer, R. Herfkens, G. Johnson, MRI of brain iron. Am J Roentgenol. 147, 103–110 (1986).

9. T. P. Naidich, M. Castillo, S. Cha, J. G. Smirniotopoulos, Imaging of the brain (Saunders, Philadelphia, 2013), Expert radiology series.

10. Y. Taege, J. Hagemeier, N. Bergsland, M. G. Dwyer, B. Weinstock-Guttman, R. Zivadinov, F. Schweser, Neuroimage, in press, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.011.

11. J. F. Schenck, E. A. Zimmerman, High‐field magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron: birth of a biomarker? Nmr Biomed. 17, 433–445 (2004).

12. Y. Gossuin, R. N. Muller, P. Gillis, Relaxation induced by ferritin: a better understanding for an improved MRI iron quantification. Nmr Biomed. 17, 427–432 (2004).

Figures

Figure 1. (a-b) Frequency shift ($$$\Delta{f}$$$) maps from Eq.1 and the simulation. (c-d) R2' maps from Eq.2 and the simulation. In the mixed-source cylinders (i.e., third-row cylinder), mean frequency shift and R2' values from the simulation highly correspond to those estimated using Eqs. 1 and 2 (e-f).

Figure 2. (a-b) Assigned positive and negative susceptibility. (c-d) Frequency shift and R2' maps from the simulation. (e) Absolute values of the assigned susceptibility vs. R2' values in the single-source-only cylinders (slope=321 Hz/ppm). Positive and negative susceptibility maps from 𝜒-separation (f-g) show great similarities to the assigned distribution (a-b). An ROI analysis in the cylinders also report a strong correlation (h; slope=0.99, R2=1.00)

Figure 3. Comparison between ex-vivo 𝜒-separation results vs. iron and myelin histology. (a-b) Frequency shift and R2' maps. (c-d) Positive and negative susceptibility maps from 𝜒-separation. (e) Iron distribution from LA-ICP-MS. (f) Myelin images from LFB staining. Similar features are observed between positive susceptibility map vs. iron image as well as negative susceptibility map vs. myelin image. 𝜒-separation maps also delineate brain anatomy observed in iron and myelin histology (see color markers).

Figure 4. (a-b) In-vivo frequency shift and R2' maps. The positive and negative susceptibility maps from 𝜒-separation (c-d) render histological features of iron and myelin distribution, respectively. For example, the deep gray matter having high iron and low myelin concentrations shows high positive susceptibility values but low negative susceptibility values (yellow arrows), whereas white matter with high myelin concentrations demonstrates high negative susceptibility values (blue arrows).

Figure 5. Comparison between in-vivo 𝜒-separation results (a-f) vs. iron and myelin histology from literatures (g-l). The positive and negative susceptibility maps demonstrate similar distributions with histologically stained iron and myelin images, respectively. The 𝜒-separation maps render exquisite details of the brain anatomy that agree with the iron and myelin histology (white arrows).

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
3968