Zahra Shams1, Sarah M. Jacobs1, Jan W. Dankbaar1, Changho Choi2, Dennis W.J. Klomp1, Jannie P. Wijnen1, and Evita C. Wiegers1
1Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
2HG is a valuable biomarker to detect
mutational status of glioma patients. Therefore, it is of great value to be
widely integrated into clinical practice. This study investigates the
performance of along echo time (PRESS
97ms) 1H MRS protocol at 3Tesla to be used in routine clinical glioma imaging.
Introduction
Cancer associated IDH-mutation produces 2-hydroxyglutarate
(2HG) in glial tumor cells1. Patients with IDH-mutated gliomas have improved overall survival rates
compared to IDH-wildtype. Therefore, 2HG detection may aid the diagnosis and
treatment planning2. 2HG can be detected by dedicated 1H-MRS (MR
spectroscopy) sequences at 3T3–5. MRS, however, is not often applied in routine clinical protocols;
hence successful data acquisition requires additional training of
technicians which in return hampers adoption in the clinical routine. To get
out of this vicious circle, we aimed to implement 2HG-MRS in the clinical
routine and show the success rate and robustness of the protocol with minimal
training. We included the 2HG protocol in clinical examinations at University Medical
Center Utrecht. The measurements were performed by technicians, guided by
instructions from experienced MR spectroscopists. Here, we present the results
of a consecutive series of patients with
glioma. Methods
Patient population
We performed 2HG MRS in 42 consecutive patients with proven
or suspected glioma. Six patients were imaged twice (Table 1).
Data acquisition and analysis
Acquisitions were performed on a 3T scanner (Philips).
A 2HG-optimized MRS protocol was implemented according to Choi et. al3 with the parameters:TE/TR=97ms/2s, spectral width=2500Hz, 2048 samples,
128 averages, scan time=5.5 min. The MRS voxel was positioned using T2w-FLAIR
images. Technicians were instructed to a) avoid including liquor, skull and
cystic part of the lesion in the MRS voxel; b) position the MRS voxel entirely
within the tumor volume to reduce the partial volume effect; c) bound the shim
box to the voxel and avoiding the air tissue interfaces inside the shim volume.
Data were preprocessed and analyzed as described by Choi et al3, using LCModel6.
The effect of relaxation rates was ignored. The unsuppressed water signal was
used as a reference for absolute metabolite quantifications, assuming an
in-vivo water concentration of 43.3
M. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and linewidth were reported by LCModel.
Partial volume of the tumor in the MRS voxel was estimated by a
neuroradiologist as the percentage of the MRS voxel filled with the FLAIR
abnormality. The majority of patients were imaged after resection and
radiotherapy. This results in uncertainty regarding presence of actual tumor
tissue in the voxel. Therefore, a likelihood of actual tumor being present
within the voxel was classified as 0, 25, 50, 75 or 100 percent, blinded for
the MRS results.
Assessment of robustness of 2HG detection
Three experienced MR spectroscopists assessed the spectra quality as good, poor (LW>14Hz) and unacceptable (SNR<3 compared
to mean SNR of ~25, large water residual or baseline distortions). Also the
reliability of the 2HG fit, regardless of the Cramér-Rao lower bound,
was evaluated as ‘Reliable’, ‘Questionable’ or ‘Unreliable’. Results
We excluded 8 datasets because of an unacceptable spectral
quality and consequently an unreliable fit (Figure 1). The
average linewidth and SNR after removal of unacceptable/unreliable spectra were
5.21±1.46 Hz and 25.31±12.8 respectively. MRS voxel size was 2.25-10.84 cm3.
The minimum level of detected 2HG
was 0.1 mM from a voxel of 3cm3 where 50% of the voxel filled with lesion with 100%
chance of being tumor (IDH-wt). The highest level of 2HG was 6.16 mM from a
voxel size of 7.5cm3 with 100% likelihood of the entire voxel contained tumor
tissue.
The amount of 2HG quantified in the ‘Reliable’ group is
not biased with the percentage of the voxel occupied by the lesion (Figure 2). We
observed that the detected 2HG level correlated with high Glx (Glutamate+Glutamine)
signal in the ‘Questionable’
2HG fits, which was in contrast to the ‘Reliable’ group (Figure 3).
For 3 of the IDH-mutant patients, 2HG was not detected
(Table 2A). For patient 1, this can be related to a very low SNR (voxel size
2.51cm3). The other two cases have a partial volume of <10%
with a tumor possibility of 25%. In all
IDH-wildtype data, 2HG was fitted (Table 2B). Regarding Patient 5, 2HG might be
overestimated by Glx signal (according to the correlation in Figure 3B). Discussion
2HG detection can be
of interest in at least two cases; detecting residual or recurrent IDH mutated
tumors, or identifying low grade gliomas, most of which have IDH mutations, in
epilepsy patients. We included both cases in this study.
In our view it is possible to implement robust 2HG-MRS in
clinical routine. We excluded 8 out of 42 spectra, however 7 of them are from
the first 20 cases when some of the technicians performed 2HG-MRS
for the first time.
We observed that the 2HG level correlated with high Glx
signal in ‘Questionable’ fits. This happened particularly when there was a high
level of Glutamate in the voxel. It seems that the signal fits of GABA, 2HG and
Glu+Gln are in competition to fit the total
resonances in the 2-2.5 ppm region. For ‘Questionable’ data quality, the fit of
Glu+Gln is dominating.
The patients in this study received various treatments and
almost all of them had surgical background. Therefore, data interpretation with
respect to therapy and false positive rates is very complicated.Conclusion
It is feasible to assess reliable 2HG levels
in patients with gliomas by integrating the 2HG MRS into clinical routine MRI
examinations at 3 Tesla.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding form Eurostars Project E!12449 IMAGINE!.References
[1] Dang, L. et al. Cancer-associated IDH1
mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 462, 739–744 (2009).
[2] Yan, H. et al. IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations
in Gliomas . N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 765–773 (2009).
[3] Choi, C. et al. 2-Hydroxyglutarate
detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with
gliomas. Nat. Med. 18, 624–629 (2012).
[4] Andronesi, O. C. et al. Detection of
2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated glioma patients by in vivo spectral-editing
and 2D correlation magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 116ra4
(2012).
[5] Branzoli, F. et al. Highly specific
determination of IDH status using edited in vivo magnetic resonance
spectroscopy. Neuro. Oncol. 20, 907–916 (2018).
[6] Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite
concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med.30(6):672-679 (1993).