The study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of IVIM-DWI and texture analysis on T2WI for the tumor differentiation grade of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, we carried out a combined analysis of IVIM-DWI and T2WI-based texture analysis for four compared groups, the AUC of these regression model for four comparison was 0.797, 0.954, 0.795, 0.952, respectively; better than each parameters of IVIM-DWI and texture features alone (0.503~0.684, 0.547~0.805, 0.511~0.712, 0.636~0.792, respectively). Thus, the combination of IVIM-DWI biomarkers and texture features based on tumorous heterogeneity could develop a novel predictive paradigm for the formulation of operation or radiation therapy.
1. Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T, et al. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol 2011; 21(5): 1102-1110.
2. Burzawa J, Gonzales M, Frumovitz M. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015; 15(7): 805-810.
3. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 125(2): 97-98.
4. Matsuo K, Mandelbaum RS, Machida H, et al. Association of tumor differentiation grade and survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Gynecol Oncol 2018; 29(6): e91.
5. Thapa D, Wang P, Wu G, et al. A histogram analysis of diffusion and perfusion features of cervical cancer based on intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 55: 103-111.
6. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 497-505.
7. Zhang S, Chiang GC, Magge RS, et al. MRI based texture analysis to classify low grade gliomas into astrocytoma and 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Magn Resom Imaging 2019; 57: 254-258.
8. Dushyant VS, Anthony ES. Abdominal Imaging. Saunders, Elsevier Inc 2011: 113.
9. Su CQ, Lu SS, Zhou MD, et al. Combined texture analysis of diffusionweighted imaging with conventional MRI for non-invasive assessment of IDH1 mutation in anaplastic gliomas. Clin Radiol 2019; 74: 154-160.
10. Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, et al. Image biomarker standardisation initiative. 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.07003.pdf.
Fig. 2 Examples of Manually Drawing ROIs for Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Panels A-H belong to a 50-year-old female with cervical squamous cell carcinoma of well differentiated. On panel A (IVIM-DWI at 1200 s/mm2), each radiologist drew ROI-1 (5mm²) three times to get the values on the maps of ADC, D, D* and f, respectively (panels B-E). Panel F is the maximum area of the lesion on T2WI, so the radiologist drew ROI-2 of the whole lesion on panel G. Panels H is the pathological performance, HE*400.
Fig. 3 Correlation Results of IVIM-DWI Based on Degree of Differentiation.
Panels A~D are the tendencies of the correlation between ADC, D, D*, f values and pathological differentiation visualized by scatter diagrams. The labels “0”, “1” and “2” represent the poorly, moderately and well differentiated groups, respectively.
Fig. 4 Statistical Results of Multiple Comparison Analysis of Texture Features on T2WI.
Panels A~C are the column diagrams of significant texture features (p < 0.05). The red, yellow and green column represent the poorly, moderately and well differentiated groups, respectively. The abbreviations are listed in Table 2.
Fig. 5 Statistical Results of ROC Curves.
Panel A is the ROC curve of regression model 1 for the comparison of poorly vs. moderately groups. Panel B is the ROC curve of regression model 2 for the comparison of moderately vs. well groups. Panel C is the ROC curve of regression model 3 for the comparison of poorly vs. moderately&well groups. Panel D is the ROC curve of regression model 4 for the comparison of well vs. moderately&poorly groups.