Chuanli Cheng1, Zhiming Wang1, Qian Wan1, Yangzi Qiao1, Changjun Tie1, Hairong Zheng1, Xin Liu1, and Chao Zou1
1Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
Synopsis
Over the past several decades, the worldwide
obesity epidemic has become a significant public health. As a consequence, accurate
measurement of obesity is critical for obesity management. In the present
study, an automated algorithm is proposed to segment subcutaneous adipose
tissue (SAT) and internal adipose tissue (IAT) from the total adipose tissue
for whole-body fat distribution analysis using proton density fat fraction (PDFF)
magnetic resonance images. The dice coefficient of the network achieved 97.6%,
and the processing time was less than 0.1s/image.
Introduction
As an important endocrine organ, adipose
tissue modulated by cerebral nervous system secrets various of hormone, which
interacts with other endocrine organs and regulates body-weight1. Excess
storage of fat disrupts metabolic balance, leading to obesity and
obesity-related metabolic syndrome. As a result, accurate quantification and
segmentation of whole-body adipose tissue is critical for obesity management.
In comparison with traditional qualitative anthropometric indices, including
body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip-ratio, direct body composition
quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more objective.
Several MR methods with manual,
semi-automatic or automatic segmentation algorithms have been used to assess
body fat deposition by exploiting the differences in the longitudinal
relaxation time (T1) or chemical shift between adipose and aqueous tissues2-3.
However, these methods have only focused on part of the body, i.e., they have
not been extended to the entire body.
In this study, a fully automatic
segmentation method is proposed using the machine learning network model based
on the proton density FF (PDFF) images for whole-body fat segmentation. The
U-Net model is designed to differentiate SAT and IAT in the PDFF images. The
proposed model shows excellent segmentation performance in several volunteers
using a relatively small amount of training data.Methods
All data were collected using 6-echo GRE
sequence on a 3.0T clinical MRI scanner (uMR790, Shanghai United Imaging
Healthcare, Shanghai, China). Twenty subjects were recruited with informed
consent under institutional review board approval to participate in the
whole-body MR scans. Each whole-body scan was performed in transverse slices
covering the neck to knee areas with eight or nine beds based on the height of
the subjects.
The six-echo GRE images were processed in
MATLAB (NATICK, CA, USA) using a fat-water separation algorithm previously
proposed by our research group to produce PDFF4. Then, the TAT was
identified by thresholding the whole image with PDFF > 80%. Inside the TAT
area, the SAT areas were labeled manually by ITK-SNAP slice by slice in all
datasets. The remaining adipose areas were treated as the IAT.
The flowchart of the image processing and
data preparation procedures is shown in Fig. 1. A total of 906 PDFF images were
obtained from all subjects, and these 906 images were randomly divided into
training (504 images; 55.63%), validation (168 images; 18.54%), and test (234
images; 25.83%) sets.
The U-Net architecture is shown in Fig. 2.
The entire network comprises twenty-three convolutional layers (including eighteen
3 × 3 convolution layers, four 2 × 2 up-convolution
layers, and one 1 × 1 convolution layer)
and four 2 × 2 maximum pooling operations. The same
padding is used in the convolution operation. Copy processing (Fig. 2) is
typically used to fully recover the refined spatial information. In this study,
three indices were used to evaluate segmentation performance, i.e., the dice
similarity coefficient (DSC), precision rate (PR), and recall rate (RR).Results
The training time was approximately four
hours for the training set (i.e., 504 images), and segmentation time was less
than 8 s per 100 images (<0.08s / image). Table 1 shows the mean and
standard deviation of DSC, PR, and RR for the validation and test sets with
values of 0.976 ± 0.048, 0.978 ± 0.048, and 0.978 ± 0.050, respectively, in
both validation and test sets.
The segmentation results for two subjects
(one female, BMI: 19.05 kg/m2;one male, BMI:
26.03 kg/m2) are shown in Fig.3, where six transverse slices from
neck to knee are shown for both subjects. The SAT images output from the
network were compared to the manual labeled images, and only very slight
differences were observed. Then, the IAT images were segmented by removing the
SAT area output from the network model in the TAT images (Fig. 4).Discussion and conclusions
In this paper, we have proposed an
automatic segmentation method to discriminate SAT and IAT based on MR PDFF
images. The proposed method represents an easy-use tool for whole-body fat
distribution analysis.
In contrast to the most popular whole-body
fat distribution analysis methods based on traditional T1 weighted spin echo images,
which are susceptible to B1 inhomogeneities, the use of quantitative PDFF
images avoids several system-related confounding factors, making the whole-body
fat segmentation simple and robust. In comparison with previous methods, such
as contour-based method5, which requires the initial snake contour
be close to the real contour, and tedious iterations to find the final contour.
However, the utilization of neural network makes the whole-body segmentation
process fast and direct, and does not need any more manual inputs.
In our next work, we will explore the
methods to classify the IAT into finer categories, e.g. brown adipose tissue,
bone marrow, intra-/inter-muscular adipose tissue, etc.Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Natural
Science Foundation of China (No. 61901462), the
Guangdong Grant ‘Key Technologies for Treatment of Brain Disorders’
(2018B030332001) and Shenzhen Double Chain Grant
([2018]256)References
1. Ahima R S, Flier J S. Adipose tissue as
an endocrine organ[J]. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2000, 11(8):
327-332.
2. Baum T, Cordes C, Dieckmeyer M, et al.
MR-based assessment of body fat distribution and characteristics[J]. European
Journal of Radiology, 2016, 85(8): 1512-1518.
3. Hu H H, Chen J, Shen W. Segmentation and
quantification of adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Magnetic
Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2016, 29(2): 259-276.
4. Cheng C, Zou C, Liang C, et al.
Fat‐water separation using a region‐growing algorithm with self‐feeding phasor
estimation[J]. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017, 77(6): 2390-2401.
5. Würslin C, Machann J, Rempp H, et al.
Topography mapping of whole body adipose tissue using A fully automated and
standardized procedure[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official
Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010,
31(2): 430-439.