Christian Guenthner1, Hannes Dillinger1, Peter Boernert2,3, and Sebastian Kozerke1
1University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany, 3Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Synopsis
Water/fat separation
can be performed by exploiting chemical shift, which is proportional to field
strength. Hence, on lower-field MRI systems (0.1 … 1T), the absolute resonance
frequency difference is reduced compared to clinical high-field MRI, raising the
question if water/fat separation can still be reliably performed despite the
proximity of the resonances. In this work, we examined the feasibility of
Dixon-type water/fat separation in the abdomen on a 0.75T lower-field MRI
system. We show that Cartesian multi-acquisition and multi-echo as well as
spiral multi-acquisition sequences provide reliable water/fat separation
despite the reduced water/fat resonance shift of approximately 108 Hz.
Introduction
Dixon water/fat separation relies on the
chemical shift of protons in water and fat.1 With the recent advent of lower-field MRIs (0.1…1T), the question arises
if the proximity of the water and fat resonance frequencies (108 Hz at
0.75T) allows for reliable water/fat separation. In this work, we evaluate the
feasibility of abdominal chemical shift-based water/fat separation on a 0.75T
lower-field MRI using three-point Dixon with Cartesian and spiral readoutsMethods
We exploited the Carbon-13 channels of the multi-nuclear
interface of a 3T Philips Achieva system (Best, The Netherlands) to measure
proton magnetization at a quarter of the nominal field strength when the system
was ramped to 0.75T. A Helmholtz-like volume transmitter and a four-channel
receive array designed to support 13C at 3T (Clinical MR Solutions, Brookfield,
WI, USA) was used for excitation and signal reception.
Cartesian multi-acquisition (MA) and
multi-echo (ME) Dixon scans were performed in healthy volunteers by adapting
the echo time increments of the Philips product sequence to 0.75T. The first
echo time was set to 2.9ms for MA (4ms ME) with an echo time increment of
3.07ms in accordance with 3-point Dixon methods2,3 and an average chemical-shift of water and fat of 108 Hz at 0.75T.
Additional scan parameters were: single slice in coronal orientation; 176x176 matrix
size; field-of-view (FOV): 350mm; slice thickness: 8mm; TR: 11.5ms (MA), 12.1ms
(ME); FA: 15°; Number of Averages: 4. The resulting nominal resolution for the
Cartesian scans was 2mm in-plane.
In addition, spiral MA Dixon scans were
performed using 10ms Archimedean spirals with 8 and 22 interleaves leading to 4-
and 11-fold averaging, respectively. The echo time was set to 1.1ms resulting
in a TR of 18.8ms and otherwise comparable scan parameters as the Cartesian MA
scan.
Reconstruction of the spiral data was
performed in MATLAB 2018a (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA), MRecon
(GyroTools LLC, Winterthur, Switzerland), and BART4 using an iterative scheme as shown in Figure 1. Water/fat
separation was performed in k-space and the fat-channel was deblurred using a seven-peak
fat-spectrum.5,6 Reconstructed echo and water/fat images were fed into an iterative
reconstruction pipeline to estimate a B0 map by comparing the phase of forward simulated
and acquired echo images; subsequently, B0 deblurring using multi-frequency
interpolation was performed7 including feedback of the deblurred echo and water/fat images into
the B0 estimation code. Coil combination was performed using ESPIRiT8 and Bart’s PICS code. Due to the lack of a uniform body coil
receive pattern, homogenization was performed by dividing by a low-resolution
(8x8 k-space) reconstruction of the water channel.
Cartesian reconstruction was performed
equivalently, however, omitting the spiral reconstruction steps as well as B0 deblurring.
Here, fat-spectrum deblurring was performed directly in image space as part of
the water/fat separation step involving the fat seven-peak model.
Apart from imaging experiments, audio
measurements in the scanner room were performed to compare sound pressure
levels between lower-field and product field-strength on the same scanner. The
microphone (Sennheiser ME 66) and linear recorder (Tascam DR-100) were calibrated
using a 1kHz tone. For comparison to 3T, the time of the Dixon sequences was adapted
to the higher field strength leading to an echo time shift of 0.77ms and an according
reduction of TR.Results & Discussion
Breath hold
duration for a single slice was 27s for the Cartesian MA and 11s for the ME scan,
respectively. Good water/fat separation performance was achieved using both
techniques and comparable field maps were estimated (Figure 2).
Breath hold durations could be further
reduced by employing spiral readouts in the multi-acquisition Dixon scan,
resulting in scan durations of 6.5s and 3.3s, respectively. Again, chemical
shift-based separation of water and fat was achieved as well as blurring-free
spiral water and fat images (Figure 3).
Due to the limited receive field of the
four-channel cardiac receive array, noise amplification is observed at the
boundary of the field-of-view. Also, transmit-field inhomogeneity can be
observed (e.g. hyper-intensity at the spleen), which is due to the
inhomogeneous B1+ of the employed transmitter. The former can be overcome by
employing abdominal arrays with increased coverage, while transmit field homogeneity
can be considerably improved by using a body coil instead of the flexible
Helmholtz-like two-loop transmitter.
In Figure 4, time vs. microphone output
plots are shown for the three sequence types, yielding a 3- to 6-fold higher
amplitude on 3T relative to 0.75T. Especially in the 3T multi-echo case, the
echo spacing of 0.77 ms is close to a larger mechanical resonance of the
Philips Achieva gradient system (1.2 kHz) yielding elevated sound pressure
levels. The reduction of Lorentz forces acting on the gradient system and
generally more lenient sequence characteristics of the lower-field system lead
to intrinsically lower sound pressure levels.Conclusions
We have demonstrated feasibility of
chemical-shift based water/fat separation using both multi-acquisition and
multi-echo Dixon with Cartesian and spiral readouts at the reduced field
strength of 0.75T within clinically feasible breath hold durations. We could
further demonstrate that Dixon imaging benefits greatly from the reduced field
strength in terms of reduced sound pressure level, which increases patient
comfort. Future work will be focused on volumetric imaging and free breathing
acquisitions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Dixon WT. Simple proton
spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1984;153(1):189-194.
doi:10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089263
2.
Glover GH, Schneider E.
Three-point dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition withB0
inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med. 1991;18(2):371-383.
doi:10.1002/mrm.1910180211
3.
Glover GH. Multipoint dixon
technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 1991;1(5):521-530. doi:10.1002/jmri.1880010504
4.
BART Toolbox for Computational
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. doi:10.5281/zenodo.592960
5.
Brodsky EK, Holmes JH, Yu H,
Reeder SB. Generalized K-space decomposition with chemical shift correction for
non-Cartesian water-fat imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(5):1151-1164.
doi:10.1002/mrm.21580
6.
Yu H, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA,
Brodsky E, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. Multiecho water-fat separation and
simultaneous R 2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling. Magn
Reson Med. 2008;60(5):1122-1134. doi:10.1002/mrm.21737
7.
Man L-C, Pauly JM, Macovski A.
Multifrequency interpolation for fast off-resonance correction. Magn Reson
Med. 1997;37(5):785-792. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910370523
8.
Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et
al. ESPIRiT - An eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where
SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(3):990-1001.
doi:10.1002/mrm.24751