Xiangdong Sun1, Chunyi Liu2, Lijun Lu2, Xiaoyun Liu1, and Wufan Chen1,2
1School of Automation Engineering,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, 2School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
The
conductivity of biological tissues can be potentially used for a cancer
diagnostic. Thus, imaging conductivity is useful for clinical applications.
Here, we developed a conductivity imaging method based on the gradient
conductivity imaging method by incorporating information from anatomical MR
images. The characteristic of the defined prior was extracting the structure
information and guided the conductivity reconstruction. To evaluate the
performance of the proposed method, the electromagnetic field and magnitude
images were simulated for a cylindrical phantom and brain model. The results
demonstrated that the proposed method preserves more details of the
conductivity images and mitigates the noise affection.
Introduction
Electrical
properties tomography has proven benefits in clinical, oncologic studies [1].
The phase-based electrical properties method is a feasible approach that
retrieves the conductivity images using MR transceive phase data [2]. In the MR
scanning for the transceive phase image, the MR magnitude image can be obtained
simultaneously. The magnitude images contain structural information. However,
it does not be used in conductivity reconstruction. Thus, exploiting the
information could improve conductivity imaging. In this study, we proposed a
new prior model to incorporate anatomical information into the gradient-based
conductivity imaging method. Theory
The central equation of gradient-based
electrical conductivity imaging method is as follows [2]:
$$\triangledown\phi\cdot\triangledown\rho+\triangledown^{2}\phi\rho-2\omega
\mu_{0}=0$$
Where $$$\rho=1/\sigma$$$, $$$\omega$$$ is angular frequency and $$$\mu_{0} $$$ is magnetic permeability in free space. The
discretized Equation (1) in an imaging region can be converted into an inverse
problem using the first-order central differential scheme, which is $$$A\rho=b$$$. To solve this problem, we perform
conductivity reconstruction via minimization of an objective function:
$$\widehat{\rho}=argmin_{\rho}\frac{1}{2}\parallel A \rho-b \parallel_2^2+\alpha\left(J\left({\rho}\right)\right)$$
Where $$$J\left({\rho}\right)$$$ is the regularization term that
enforces prior knowledge, $$$\alpha$$$ is the
regularization parameters.
We
define a prior that extract the Structural Similarity between conductivity and
MR magnitude image [3-4], the prior model is expressed as:
$$J\left({\rho}\right)=
\parallel\langle D\left(v\right),\triangledown{\rho}\rangle\parallel_1$$
Where $$$v$$$
is the MR magnitude image.
$$D_x\left({v}\right)=\sum_{q\in R\left(p\right)} g_{p,q}\cdot\mid\left(\partial_{x}v_q
\right)\mid$$
$$D_y\left({v}\right)=\sum_{q\in R\left(p\right)}
g_{p,q}\cdot\mid\left(\partial_{y}v_q \right)\mid$$
where $$$R\left(p\right)$$$ is the region that centered in $$$p$$$. $$$g_{p,g}$$$ is
a weighting function defined according to spatial distance, expressed as:
$$g_{p,g}\propto exp\left(-\frac{\left(x_p-x_q\right)^2
+\left(y_p-y_q\right)^2}{2\xi^2}\right)$$
where
$$$\xi$$$ controls the spatial scale of the window, $$$x_p$$$, $$$y_p$$$ are the horizontal and vertical coordinates of
pixel $$$v_p$$$, $$$x_q$$$, $$$y_q$$$ are
the horizontal and vertical coordinates of pixel $$$v_q$$$; $$$p$$$, $$$q$$$
index the image pixels. The prior can extract the meaningful structure from
the MR image in a local window. The optimal optimization is solved by the alternating
direction method of multipliers (ADMM) method [5].
Method
The complex $$$B_1^+$$$ filed was simulated using
a Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) based software (SEMCAD X. 14.6, Zurich
Switzerland). Figure 1 shows the simulation setup; it contains the quadrature
birdcage coil, cylindrical phantom and human brain model (Duke Model, Virtual
family). The cylindrical phantom includes three parts to mimic brain tissues: white
matter, grey matter and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as shown in Figure 1(b). The
simulation was performed at 128MHz (3T) and then the phase of $$$B_{1}^{+}$$$ and
$$$B_{1}^{-}$$$ was added to get transceive phase.
The MR magnitude image was emulated in Matlab
(The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA) using a Bloch simulator [6]. The input for
the simulation was the geometry of the cylindrical phantom, the $$$B_{1}^{+}$$$ amplitude
map from electromagnetic simulation and the T1 and T2 maps. The SE sequence was
simulated for this study, and the T1-Weighted image was obtained by adjusting
the TR and TE parameters. Then the magnitude images were used to construct the
prior.
The proposed method was compared with the conventional method (referred to as CM ),
which is based on the homogenous assumption, and the double regularization
method(referred to as DRM ), whose regularization terms contain total variation
and wavelet transform.Results
Figure 2 shows the simulation images of
cylindrical phantom and head model, figure 2(a) is the magnetic image of $$$B_{1}^{+}$$$
and figure 2(b) is the transceive phase. Figure 2(c) depicts the simulated MR
magnetic images and figure 2(d) is the directional structure information $$$D_x$$$ and $$$D_y$$$.
The reconstructed conductivity maps of the
cylindrical phantom are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) shows the results
obtained from noise-free data. The profile of the proposed method is matched
with the target profile. Figure 3(b) presents the conductivity under the noise condition;
the proposed method describes the accurate results than other methods.
Figure
4 shows the results of the human brain model. Figure 4(a) is the conductivity
distribution without noise contamination. Figure 4(b) magnifies the block areas
in figure 4(a). The results of the proposed method preserve more details than
conventional and double regularization methods. Figure 4(c) is the result under
noise conditions; the conductivity of the proposed method shows the clearer
structure, which indicates that the proposed method improves the accuracy of
the conductivity imaging.Discussion and Conclusion
In
the implementation of conductivity imaging, the MR magnitude image is obtained
when get the transceive phase image. The magnitude image contains the structure
information of the object. Thus, we defined a new prior model to extracting the
structure information to improve the conductivity reconstruction. The proposed
method exploits the anatomical information to preserve more detail and reduce
the effect of noise. The simulation of the cylindrical phantom and head model
was used to validate the superiority of the proposed method. However, in the
calculation of the proposed method, some parameters need to be set. Thus a
method that parameters determined automatically should be done. The MR magnitude
image simulation was performed for the SE sequence because it is easy to
simulate and is common in clinical applications.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of
Guangdong Province under Grant 2018B030333001, the National key research and
development program under grant 2016YFC0104003, the Natural Science Foundation
of Guangdong Province under grants 2016A030313577, and the Program of Pearl
River Young Talents of Science and Technology in Guangzhou under grant
201610010011.References
1. Zhang X, Schmitter S, Moortele P-FVd,
Liu J, He B. From complex B1 mapping to local SAR estimation for human brain MR
imaging using multi-channel transceiver coil at 7T. IEEE Trans Med Imaging
2013: 32(6):1058-67.
2. Gurler N, Ider YZ. Gradient-based
electrical conductivity imaging using MR phase. Magn Reson Med. 2017;
77:137-150.
3. Ehrhardt MJ, Betcke MM. Multicontrast
MRI Reconstruction with Structure-Guided Total Variation. SIAM Journal on
Imaging Sciences. 2016; 9:1084-1106.
4. Xu L, Yan Q, Xia Y, Jia J. Structure
extraction from texture via relative total variation. ACM Transactions on
Graphics. 2012; 31:1-10.
5. Boyd, S.; Parikh, N.; Chu, E.; Peleato,
B.; Eckstein, J. Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the
Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2011, 3
6. Hargreaves
B. Bloch Equation Simulator. http://mrsrl.stanford.edu/~brian/blochsim/.