Diana M. Marin-Castrillon1, Arnaud Boucher1, Siyu Lin1, Chloe Bernard2, Marie-Catherine Morgant1,2, Alexandre Cochet1,3, Alain Lalande 1,3, Benoit Presles 1, and Olivier Bouchot 1,2
1ImViA Laboratory, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France, 2Department of Cardio-Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France, 3Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
Synopsis
Analysis
of aorta hemodynamics
is useful in the evaluation of aortic diseases. 4D PC-MRI provides information
of flow velocity in the aorta and automatic segmentation is one of the biggest challenges.
We propose a fully 3D automatic segmentation of the
aorta in systole using a multi-atlas
approach. Evaluation on 16
patients provided an average performance of 29.55±24.33 mm and 0.859
±0.024 for Hausdorff distance and Dice score
respectively. With the proposed method, the automatic segmentation
of the thoracic aorta that can be obtained from 4D PC-MRI is
close enough to the manual one to be used in future studies.
Introduction
Analysis and evaluation of aorta hemodynamics is
important because it allows the physician to identify flow patterns, biomechanical parameters such as wall shear stress (WSS) and
to custom
the treatment. Indeed, aorta diseases such as aneurysms or coarctations can
modify in different ways the tissue characteristics and the blood
flow through this artery. Currently, image
modalities such as 4D Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D PC-MRI) are used to determine flow velocities
in the aorta,
however, it is mainly used for research purposes1. Therefore, for the use of 4D PC-MRI in clinical practice, it is
important to standardize analysis techniques and one of the biggest challenges
is the automatic segmentation of vessels due to the image quality.
In this work, we present a fully automatic multi-atlas segmentation approach
using 3D PC-MRI by considering the systolic phase.Methods
For this study, 16 patients underwent
free-breathing 4D PC-MRI acquisitions,
generating for each one 25 volumes to cover the cardiac cycle with a spatial
resolution of 2x2x2
mm3 and a temporal
resolution of 24.28 to 52.04
ms
according to the patient. The
labeled images for the atlas were created by segmenting manually the aorta in a 3D
volume corresponding to the systolic phase. The subclavian, carotid, and branchiocephalic arteries were excluded due to their low
visibility in the 3D PC-MRI images. To automatically segment a target image (fixed image) with an image from the atlas (moving image),
the latter is register first
by performing an intensity-based affine registration using the mutual
information as similarity measure and then, a B-spline intensity-based registration to retrieve local
deformations using the normalized
correlation coefficient (NCC) as similarity
measure. The final control
point grid spacing was set to 24x24x16
mm in the x, y, and z axis
respectively. In both
registration processes, a multi-resolution strategy was
applied. Lastly,
the resulting transformations (affine
+ B-spline) were applied to
the corresponding manual segmentation providing an
automatic segmentation of the target image. This registration
strategy was
repeated with all the images in the atlas and a majority voting (MV) process was used to obtain the final target segmentation by assigning to each voxel the label that is most repeated. To quantify the performance of our method, we use two classical
metrics, the Hausdorff distance (in mm) and the Dice index, but also
a 3D Hausdorff distance map in order to
highlight errors distribution. To compute the average performance a
leave-one-patient-out strategy was carried out, along with an atlas selection process to determine the compromise between the best average performance and
the less number of masks for MV. For the atlas selection step, the NCC between the
target image and the warped images were calculated and sorted to apply MV adding
the masks one by one in ascending order of similarity
(Figure 1). Results
To analyze the performance of the proposed
method both
globally and locally and identify
the region of the aorta with the most important errors, we divided the aorta into three regions,
ascending aorta (AAO), descending thoracic aorta (DTAO), and proximal abdominal aorta (PAAO). The best performance was
reached with ten masks and the average global Hausdorff distance and Dice index were 29.55±24.33 mm and 0.86±0.024 respectively. Nonetheless, by computing them locally the performance increases for the
AAO (14.39±6.37 mm and 0.87±0.043) and the DTAO (8.31±2.11 mm and 0.88±0.03) compared to results obtained for the
PAAO (37.94±24.9 and 0.719±0.19). Figure 2 shows the patients with the
highest and lowest performance.Discussion
We can observe a degradation of the performance segmentation
of PAAO which is related to the image quality because
this area is far from the center of the phase-array thoracic coil and in
consequence, there is a decrease in the signal to
noise ratio. With atlas selection, we found that the
number of masks required to obtain the best average performance was ten but using more masks the average performance decreases,
affecting in greater proportion the Hausdorff
distance. However, the increase in error was more associated
to the PAAO and this may be related to the fact that majority voting gives the
same relevance to all the images and increasing the number of masks also
increases variations in this area with questionable segmentation as explained
above.Conclusion
Our 3D PC-MRI
atlas-based aorta segmentation provides
accurate automatic segmentations of the ascending and descending thoracic aorta
compared to those generated manually. In future works the automatic segmentations
obtained could be used for the hemodynamics analysis of this
artery and for a subsequent propagation of 3D to 4D segmentation to obtain the aorta
shape through the cardiac cycle. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the University Hospital of Dijon for providing the 4D PC-MRI used in this work and those that will be provided in the future. Professor Olivier Bouchot is also thanked for his help with manual segmentations and medical knowledge.References
1. Stankovic Z, Allen BD, Garcia J,
Jarvis KB, Markl M. 4D PC flow. Cardiovascular. 2014;4(2):173-192.
doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.01.02