Bretta Russell-Schulz1, Jasmyne Kassam2, Michael Waine2, Erin L MacMillan1,3,4, Irene Vavasour1, Helen Cross2, Anthony Traboulsee2, Robert Carruthers2, and Shannon Kolind2,5,6
1Radiology, UBC MRI Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada, 4Simon Fraser University's ImageTech Lab, Surrey, BC, Canada, 5Physics & Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Synopsis
This study establishes pre-treatment baseline metabolite
concentrations for a longitudinal clinical trial for RRMS and PPMS using 1H-MRS. The high MRS data quality and
similar in FWHM across all participants creates a strong baseline for detecting
change over time. Furthermore, knowing the pre-treatment concentration and
tracking concentration changes in the MS subtypes compared to a baseline HC group
will allow us to learn more about the mechanisms of action of this therapy.
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating
disease of the central nervous system (CNS)1 with different disease
courses and possibly different pathogenesis2, here we examine
Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) and Primary Progressive MS (PPMS). We used 1H
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to examine metabolites within a mostly white
matter brain region in both groups pre-treatment and a matched (across the
whole MS cohort) healthy control (HC) cohort. We aim to establish baseline MRS
data that can be used in the future to compare with treatment groups as part of
a larger clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: NCT02688985). Methods
All RRMS/PPMS participants were recruited from the UBC Hospital MS
clinic as part of the OBOE ML29966 study, with demographics given in
Figure 1. MRS PRESS (TE=30ms, TR=4000ms) sequence was collected on a 3T Philips
Achieva in a large (65x15x20mm3) mostly white matter region in the
left hemisphere (shown in Figure 2). The sequence was collected in two shots of
16 signal averages (NSA) that were frequency aligned, eddy current corrected
and had residual water removed offline and averaged to result in NSA=32. Lesion
masks were created semi-automatically by a trained observer3 and registered to the FAST
tissue-segmented anatomical MPRAGE to determine tissue content. Fitting was
performed with LCModel4 and outputs were corrected for
tissue water content. Absolute errors were determined by multiplying the absolute
metabolite concentration by the %SD output from LCModel. Absolute errors higher
than 30% of the median metabolite concentration were considered poorly fit and rejected5. LCModel’s quality of fit
measures were also examined; Full-Width-Half-Maximum (FWHM) and Signal-to-Noise
Ratio (SNR). Since this is preliminary baseline data, group comparison
statistics were not performed on the measures.Results
The large volume of interest (VOI) in a mostly white matter
region produced high quality spectra with high signal to noise (median=31,
range=21-31) and low FWHM (median=4.3Hz, range=3.4-6.9Hz). No metabolite
concentration value was rejected in the main metabolites of interest; total N-acetyl
aspartate (tNAA) and NAA, total creatine (tCr), total choline (tCho), glutamate
(Glu) and myo-inositol (mI) (illustrated in Figure 2b). Metabolite
concentrations for all groups are shown in Figure 3. tNAA and NAA appeared to
be similar between groups, however there was one PPMS outlier at a much lower
concentration. tCr and tCho varied widely across the MS groups and there was a hint of a general
increase in tCr in MS compared to HC. We did observe that 9/14 PPMS
participants exhibited levels of mI that were higher than 9/10 HC levels. The average lesion fraction for the RRMS and
PPMS groups were 1% and 3% respectively, showing a negligible lesion fraction
in the VOI, Figure 4. Figure 4 also shows the distribution of FWHM and SNR
between groups, FWHM was comparable between groups and the SNR was roughly 10%
higher in HC compared to PPMS. One PPMS participant had a high lesion load of
26% and the highest EDSS at 6.5 and lowest SNR, and also exhibited the lowest
[tNAA] and [NAA]. Figure 5 shows the tissue segmentation and lesion mask for
this participant and the spectrum exhibiting high data quality.Discussion
NAA is associated with neuron density or integrity , and also
reflects oligodendrocyte/myelin vitality6. Decreases in tNAA or NAA are
often found in pathologies including MS7, but were not observed here. However,
literature reports of decreased NAA in MS have largely used ratios to creatine
rather than absolute concentrations. In this preliminary baseline study we
observed large variations in tCr in MS, suggesting changes in creatine may have
been driving previously reported changes in MS NAA/tCr ratios. Further, we would expect NAA decreases
primarily in lesions, while this study found a very small lesion fraction in
the VOI; the one PPMS participant with high lesion load had very low tNAA and
NAA levels.
tCho and mI are thought to increase with inflammation, and
while tCho levels varied widely among the MS groups, 9/14 PPMS participants
appeared to exhibit elevated mI. It will be valuable to follow how this
elevated mI changes over time with treatment.
The quality of the data was high across all subject groups.
Figure 5b shows that even in the participant with the lowest SNR the data is
well fit and the FWHM is well within the range of the healthy control spectra.
In summary, this study establishes pre-treatment baseline
metabolite concentrations for a longitudinal clinical trial. The high MRS data
quality and similar in FWHM across all participants creates a strong baseline
for detecting change over time. Furthermore, knowing the pre-treatment
concentration and tracking concentration changes in the MS subtypes compared to
a baseline HC group will allow us to learn more about the mechanisms of action
of this therapy. Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by Genentech, IncReferences
1. Ghasemi, N., Razavi, S. & Nikzad,
E. Multiple sclerosis: Pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnoses and cell-based
therapy. Cell J. 19, 1–10 (2017).
2. Lublin, F. D. et al. Defining
the clinical course of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 83, 278–286
(2014).
3. McAusland, J., Tam, R. C., Wong, E.,
Riddehough, A. & Li, D. K. B. Optimizing the use of radiologist seed points
for improved multiple sclerosis lesion
segmentation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, (2010).
4. Provencher, S. W. Automatic
quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed. 14,
260–264 (2001).
5. Kreis, R. The trouble with quality
filtering based on relative Cramer-Rao lower bounds. Magn. Reson. Med. 18,
15–18 (2015).
6. Nordengen, K., Heuser, C., Rinholm, J.
E., Matalon, R. & Gundersen, V. Localisation of N-acetylaspartate in
oligodendrocytes/myelin. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 899–917
(2015).
7. Gülin, Ö. Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy of Degenerative Brain Diseases. 13–30 (2016).
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33555-1