Amaresha Shridhar Konar1, Akash Deelip Shah2, Ramesh Paudyal1, Jung Hun Oh1, Eve LoCastro1, David Aramburu Nuñez1, Nathaniel Swinburne2, Robert J. Young2, Andrei I. Holodny2, Kathryn Beal3, Vaios Hatzoglou2, and Amita Shukla-Dave1,2
1Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 2Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 3Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
In the clinical
settings it is essential to accurately assess, whether or not a brain metastases
has been successfully treated or whether it requires additional treatment,
especially in high dose radiation therapy, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The present
prospective study aims to determine the ability of Diffusion Weighted (DW)- and
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI to predict the long-term response of brain metastases
within 72 hours of SRS. The preliminary results are promising as it will inform
the treating physicians at an early time point about which patients will
benefit from SRS (or not).
Introduction:
Intravoxel incoherent
motion (IVIM) DW-MRI has demonstrated promise in simultaneously characterizing
the properties of tumor diffusion and perfusion in cancer patients1, 2. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI provides information
of tumor vascularity and permeability3, 4. There is growing evidence
that perfusion MRI can improve the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with
brain tumors over conventional imaging alone5, 6. Method:
There were 25 total
brain metastases (BM) included from 16 patients that consented and enrolled in
the study. All pre-SRS and within 72
hours post-SRS MRI examinations were performed on a 3 T MRI scanner (Philips
Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Netherlands) using an 8-channel head coil. The
standard clinical MRI acquisition along with the DCE- and DWI-MRI acquisition
were performed with the parameters reported in the literarture7-9. All the ROIs were delineated by a board-certified neuroradiologist. All
DW- and DCE-MRI data postprocessing and map generation were performed using
in-house–developed software entitled MRI Quantitative Analysis of
Multi-Parametric Evaluation Routines (MRI-QAMPER)9, 10. For all
patients, the clinical assessment was classified as progressive disease (PD),
stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) based on the
Response Assessment Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria11. Statistical Analysis: Univariate
analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test (WRST) to find the
degree of differences between the grouped analysis (based on RANO criterion). Wilcoxon
Signed Rank Test (WSRT) used to assess the potentially significant biomarker
changes, pre- and post-SRS (within 72 hours) within the lesions regardless of the
outcome. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used
Storey’s method for multiple comparisons to control for false positive
discoveries and have reported q-values.Result:
The majority
(75%) of the BM were from melanoma and lung primary tumors (Table 1). Using
RANO-BM criteria, 20/25 lesions demonstrated local control after SRS. Rates of
CR, PR, SD, and PD were 12%, 52%, 16%, and 20%, respectively. Eighty percent
(20/25) of the lesions met the RANO-BM criteria for measurable disease. Twenty
percent (5/25) were smaller and were included for analysis according to our modified
criteria but none measured less than 5 mm. Representative DWI and DCE-derived
parametric maps overlaid on corresponding DWI and DCE-MRI images (pre- and
post-SRS) for two patients are shown in Figures 1–2. For comparisons between
outcome groups, univariate analysis using the WRST demonstrated a significant
difference in both mean and median f acquired early post-SRS (q = 0.041 and
0.033 respectively). Lesions that demonstrated PD had a higher f mean (0.416
vs. 0.336) and f median (0.500 vs. 0.358) than lesions that did not demonstrate
PD. Using the Youden index, we determined that a post-SRS f mean cutoff value
of 0.383 and f median cutoff value of 0.494 yielded a sensitivity of 100% and
specificity of 86% for predicting PD and non-PD, with a receiver operating
characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 and 0.93 respectively (Figure
3). Notably, post-SRS D* mean demonstrated statistical significance between the
PD and non-PD groups (p = 0.046) but did not demonstrate q < 0.05 upon
multiple comparison analysis (q = 0.051). When the lesions were separated as
responders (CR and PR) and non-responders (PD and SD), there was a significant
difference in ve median on pre-SRS DCE-MRI (q = 0.041). Lesions that
responded to SRS had a lower ve median than those that did not
(0.089 vs. 0.181). A pre-SRS ve median cutoff value of 0.086 was 88%
sensitive and 60% specific, with an AUC of 0.78 (Figure 3). There was also a
significant difference in pre-SRS Ktrans mean and median (q = 0.041
and 0.033 respectively). Lesions that responded to SRS had lower Ktrans
mean and median than those that did not (0.044 vs. 0.093 and 0.032 vs. 0.080
respectively). A pre-SRS Ktrans mean cutoff value of 0.044 was 100%
sensitive and 60% specific, with an AUC of 0.78. A pre-SRS Ktrans
median cutoff value of 0.029 was 100% sensitive and 67% specific, with an AUC
of 0.85 (Figure 3). These findings are
summarized in Figure 4. We did not find any significant differences in metrics
(Δ) between pre- and early post-SRS images when comparing BM with PD to those
without progression (SD, PR, or CR), or when comparing BM that objectively
responded (PR or CR) to those with PD or SD. When the
differences in metrics (Δ) between pre- and early post-SRS scans for the entire
cohort were compared regardless of outcome, WSRT showed statistically
significant changes in vp mean (p = 0.009) as well as a trend toward
significance in ADC mean and median (p =
0.052 and 0.065 respectively). These findings are summarized in Figure 4.
Pre-SRS tumor volume was significant (p = 0.044) for predicting
response (CR/PR) versus non-response (PD/SD). A cut off value 2725 mm3
was 82% sensitive and 74% specific with AUC = 0.76. Pre-SRS tumor volume was
not significant when comparing PD versus non-PD. Only 2/5 lesions with PD
demonstrated an increase in size on follow-up imaging within 3 months of SRS.Conclusion:
Our study demonstrates that multiparametric MRI
can demonstrate early (within 72 hours) radiobiological changes within BM
treated with SRS. Additionally, quantitative analysis of these biomarkers could
predict long-term tumor response.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lemke, A., et al., Differentiation of
pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values:
comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion
derived parameters. Invest Radiol, 2009. 44(12): p. 769-75.
2. Sigmund, E.E., et al., Intravoxel
incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration
and furosemide flow challenges. Radiology, 2012. 263(3): p. 758-69.
3. Law, M., et al., Glioma grading:
sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and
proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am
J Neuroradiol, 2003. 24(10): p. 1989-98.
4. Law, M., et al., Histogram analysis
versus region of interest analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion
MR imaging data in the grading of cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,
2007. 28(4): p. 761-6.
5. Barajas, R.F., Jr., et al.,
Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis
after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted
contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology, 2009. 253(2): p. 486-96.
6. Matsusue, E., et al., Distinction
between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR
imaging. Neuroradiology, 2010. 52(4): p. 297-306.
7. Hatzoglou, Vaios, et al. "Dynamic
contrast‐enhanced MRI perfusion for differentiating between melanoma and lung
cancer brain metastases." Cancer medicine 6.4 (2017): 761-767.
8. Federau, Christian, et al.
"Measuring brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM):
initial clinical experience." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 39.3
(2014): 624-632.
9. Paudyal, Ramesh, et al. "Repeatability of quantitative
diffusion-weighted imaging metrics in phantoms, head-and-neck and thyroid
cancers: preliminary findings." Tomography 5.1 (2019): 15.
10. Paudyal,
Ramesh, et al. "Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI model selection for
predicting tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancers." NMR in
Biomedicine 33.1 (2020): e4166.
11. Lin, Nancy U., et al. "Response assessment
criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group." The lancet
oncology 16.6 (2015): e270-e278.