Anuj Sharma1 and Andrew J Wheaton1
1Magnetic Resonance, Canon Medical Research USA, Inc., Mayfield Village, OH, United States
Synopsis
Deep learning based denoising methods can significantly
reduce image noise at the cost of producing unnaturally smooth images.
Typically, natural-looking images are produced by blending a fraction of the
acquired noisy image with the denoised image. The blending ratio is set based
on visual inspection. This approach impedes workflow and is prone to inter-operator
variability. We propose a method to analytically calculate the blending ratio
based on a desired SNR value. The proposed method is demonstrated to produce
natural-looking denoised images with consistent SNR across head, spine and knee
applications.
Introduction
In
recent years, several deep learning-based methods have been proposed to denoise
high resolution MR images1-3. Typically, a convolutional neural
network (CNN) is used. The CNN is trained on a range of noise levels to allow
denoising of a wide variety of clinical images containing different amounts of
noise. A common challenge in these deep learning methods is that the denoised
images appear unnaturally smooth. Even when all the anatomical details and
image contrast are preserved, the denoised image can look artificially plastic.
Clinicians trained to read medical images tend to prefer a natural-looking
image, which includes some amount of image noise. The complete absence of noise
can impede diagnostic interpretation. To provide a natural looking image, the
denoised image is typically blended with a fraction of the original noisy image.
The blending ratio is empirically set by the operator based on visual
inspection. This qualitative approach impedes workflow and is vulnerable to
inter-operator variability.
We
propose a method to automatically blend the output denoised images with the
input noisy images to generate images with consistent SNR across different
anatomies and contrasts. Instead of qualitatively setting the blending ratio
for each imaging volume, a common target SNR value can be set for a range of
scan conditions. The target SNR value is used to analytically calculate the
blending ratio without operator intervention. We demonstrate that the proposed
method can produce consistent SNR in images denoised using a CNN across head,
spine, and knee applications.Methods
The blending
ratio (β) is calculated using the formula $$$\beta = 1 - \frac{S\sigma_i-\mu}{S\sigma_r}$$$ where S is the target
SNR value, μ is the mean
image intensity in the tissue voxels, σi is the noise
standard deviation in the input noisy image, σr is the
noise standard deviation in the residual image. Figure 1 shows the steps used
to calculate β. For a given noisy input image Inoisy and denoised image Idenoised, the
blended image is given by Iblended = Idenoised + βInoisy.
To
test the proposed method, a residual CNN motivated by DnCNN4 was
designed with 19 hidden and 2 outer layers. The input layer comprised a
convolution layer followed by ReLU activation. The 19 hidden layers comprised a
convolution layer with ReLU activation and batch normalization, followed by an
output convolution layer. All layers had 64 convolution kernels of size 3x3. A
residual connection was made between the input and output layers.
Training
images were acquired in normal subjects on a Vantage Galan 3T scanner (Canon
Medical Systems Corporation, Japan) using head T1-weighted FSE, T2-weighted
FSE, FLAIR, and MP-RAGE sequences. Seven studies were acquired using each
sequence, for a total of 28 studies. Typical FOV was 24x24 cm2.
Acquisition matrix size was varied between 256x256 and 640x640 to obtain
training images at different spatial resolutions. Training image pairs of low
SNR input and high SNR target images were created. The high SNR target images
were obtained by rigid-body registration and averaging of five repeated
measurements of the same imaging volume. The low SNR input images were
generated by adding noise to high SNR target images. Noise with levels in the
range 3-25% was added based on measurements performed on clinical protocols.
Noise level is defined by the noise standard deviation as a percentage of the
mean image intensity inside the anatomy of interest.
Test
images were acquired using head axial FLAIR, lumbar spine sagittal STIR, and
fat suppressed knee sagittal intermediate-weighted (IW) sequences. The test
images were denoised using the trained CNN. The denoised images were blended
with the input images using the proposed method. The head images were blended
with target SNR values of 10, 15 and 20. The knee and spine images were blended
with a target SNR value of 10.Results
Figure
2 shows the results from the head FLAIR experiments. Images processed by the
denoising CNN have high SNR and contain all the anatomical details but appear unnaturally
smooth. The blended images demonstrate the application of the proposed method
at different target SNR values. The SNR measured on the blended images closely
match the target SNR values. Figure 3 shows the results from lumbar spine STIR
and knee IW experiments. The images denoised by the CNN have high SNR compared
to images without denoising. However, the images produced by the CNN appear
undesirably smooth. The blended images produced by the proposed method provide
a good balance between SNR improvement and image smoothness. The SNR values
measured on the blended images closely match the target SNR values.Discussion
We
have demonstrated a method that provides consistent SNR in images denoised
using a convolutional neural network, across head, lumbar spine, and knee
applications. Instead of using visual inspection to set the blending ratio, the
proposed method utilized SNR as a quantitative metric to produce images of
consistent diagnostic quality across different applications. The benefits of
the proposed method can be further verified in a future clinical validation study.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kidoh M, Shinoda K, Kitajima M, et al. Deep
learning based noise reduction for brain MR imaging: tests on phantoms and
healthy volunteers. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0018.
2. Zhao Y, Liu Y, Mak HK, et al. Simultaneous
denoising of multi-contrast MR images using a novel weighted nuclear norm minimization
approach. ISMRM 27th annual meeting 2019, p. 0669.
3. Jiang D, Dou W, Vosters L, et al. Denoising of
3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of
convolutional neural network, arXiv:1712.08726v2, 2018.
Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, et al. Beyond a Gaussian
denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising.
arXiv:1608.03981v1, 2016.