Masaaki Hori1,2, Kouhei Kamiya1,2, Akifumi Hagiwara2,3, Kazumasa Yokoyama4, Issei Fukunaga5, Katsuhiro Sano2, Koji Kamagata2, Katsutoshi Murata6, Shohei Fujita2, Christina Andica2, Akihiko Wada2, Julien Cohen-Adad7, and Shigeki Aoki2
1Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan, 2Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 4Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 5Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 6Siemens Japan K.K, Tokyo, Japan, 7NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada
Synopsis
We investigated
free water eliminated kurtosis-based white matter tract integrity to
distinguish microstructural changes in the spinal cords of patients with MS and
Neuromyelitis Optica. FA was significant higher in spinal cord white matter in
MS (P=0.0025). There
was no significant difference in other diffusion model-based metrics. The values of FA seem to be non-specific
but robust. Therefore, clinical feasible and more optimized diffusion
microstructural models and data acquisitions for spinal cord may be needed to
provide an additional information and to be biomarker in patients with MS and
NMOSD in vivo.
Introduction:
Multiple sclerosis (MS) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
(NMOSD) are diseases of immune system attack and they
lead to disability from nervous system damage. In the past, some NMOSD had been
misdiagnosed and treated as a form of MS. Nowadays, scientific consensus
distinguishes MS and NMOSD because the pathologic processes and effective
treatments are different. However, the values of conventional MR imaging is
limited for structural changes and demonstration of insufficient lesions1,
and the evaluation of so-called normal-appearing damaged tissue method remains
to be established for both diseases. As recently showed, diffusion
kurtosis imaging-derived white matter tract integrity (WMTI) metrics2, 3
might provide more pathological specificity and clinically meaningful
information in brain of MS patients4. However, partial volume effects with the surrounding cerebral
spinal fluid are biasing diffusion MRI measurements in the spinal cord. Recently,
Free water elimination technique was introduced to correct for free water bias
in diffusion MRI5. The
purpose of this study is to investigate
the impact of free water elimination in WMTI metrics to distinguish microstructural
change in the spinal cords of MS and NMOSD patients.Methods:
In this prospective study, we
enrolled 35 MS patients (age 47±11 years, 26 females; 31 RRMS, 4 SPMS, median
EDSS score 2.0) and 18 NMOSD patients (age 57±17 years, 15 females). After
conventional MR imaging including T2-, T2*- and T1-wegted imaging, 2-shell
diffusion MR imaging data using regional excitation
technique (ZoomIt) were acquired with a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner with a body
coil excitation and 64-ch head/neck coil for reception. Imaging parameters for
2-shell dMRI were as follows: repetition time (TR)/echo
time: 2200/76 (ms/ms); section thickness: 5 mm; 39 slices; in-plane pixel size:
0.9x 0.9
mm; SMS factor: 2; imaging time: approximately 12 min; 2 b values (1000 and
2000 s/mm 2) with two b=0 images and diffusion encoding in 30
direction for every b value. All
diffusion MRI data were transferred to an offline workstation and processed
using in-house developed software in Matlab (R2019a, Math Works, Inc, Natick,
MA). After free water elimination model5 was applied for all the
diffusion MRI data, parametric maps of mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK),
fractional anisotropy (FA), axonal water fraction (AWF), axial and radial
intra-axonal diffusivities (Di, axial and Di, radial, respectively) and axial
and radial extra-axonal diffusivities (De, axial and De, radial, respectively)4
were calculated. We refer to the branches as Branch 1 (yielding Da ≤ De,∥)
and Branch 2 (yielding Da >
De,∥), as Hansen et al6. Moreover, semi-automated
analysis was performed using the Spinal Cord Toolbox7 for
segmentation, motion correction, registration to WM atlas and extraction of
metrics (Figure 1). Between MS and NMOSD, quantitative metrics in the white
matter at C2, C3, C4 and C5 were selected and compared. Statistical
evaluations were performed by using R version 3.5.0 (http://www.r-project.org)
using t- test. we calculated the
false discovery rate (FDR) using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to ac-count
for multiple hypothesis tests. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:
All metrics values of white
matter of spinal cords in patients with MS and NMOSD were summarized in table 1
and Figure 2. Only FA at C5 spinal level was significant higher in spinal cord
white matter in patients with MS (P=0.0025), after FDR adjustment. There was no
difference in the other metrics.Discussion:
Our results show that the
diffusion metric values seem to be reasonable, but only FA seems to be useful in
capturing the different pathological microstructural change in the spinal cord
white matter in MS and NMOSD, presumably caused by different degrees of
demyelination and axonal damages. KG Schilling et al. pointed out that the signal model such as diffusion tensor,
which makes no explicit assumptions on microstructure, showed strong
correlations with all ground truth indices of spinal cord microstructure8. The values of FA seem to be non-specific but sensitive
and robust. Therefore, clinically feasible and more optimized diffusion
microstructural models and data acquisitions for spinal cord may be needed to
provide an additional information and to be biomarker in patients with MS and NMOSD.Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K08161, the
Canada Research Chair in Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging [950-230815],
the Canadian Institute of Health Research [CIHR FDN-143263], the Canada
Foundation for Innovation [32454, 34824], the Fonds de Recherche du Québec -
Santé [28826], the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies
[2015-PR-182754], the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada [435897-2013], the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (IVADO and
TransMedTech) and the Quebec BioImaging Network [5886].References
- Miki Y, et al.Relapsing-remitting multiple
sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR images--lack of correlation between
changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical findings. Radiology. 1999 ;213(2):395-9.
- Fieremans et al. White matter
characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage. 2011 ;58(1):177-88.
- Veraart J, et al. More accurate estimation
of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion Kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson
Med. 2011 ;65(1):138-45.
- de Kouchkovsky I, et
al. Quantification
of normal-appearing white matter tract integrity in multiple sclerosis: a
diffusion kurtosis imaging study. J Neurol. 2016 ;263(6):1146-55.
- A.R. Hoy et al.Optimization of a free
water elimination two-compartment model for diffusion tensor imaging NeuroImage
2014; 103:323-333
- Hansen B, et al. White matter biomarkers
from fast protocols using axially symmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR
Biomed. 2017 ;30(9). doi: 10.1002/nbm.3741.
- De Leener B,et al. SCT:
Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI
data. Neuroimage. 2017 ;145(Pt A):24-43.
- K.G. Schilling et al. Diffusion
MRI microstructural models in the cervical spinal cord –Application, normative
values, and correlations with histological analysisNeuroImage 2019;201: 116026