Thomas Lindner1, Hajrullah Ahmeti2, Michael Helle3, Olav Jansen4, Michael Synowitz2, and Stephan Ulmer4,5
1University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 2Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany, 3Tomographic Imaging Department, Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany, 4Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany, 5Radiology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
Synopsis
Using EPI Arterial Spin Labeling, resting state networks can be mapped during neurosurgery without an additional acquisition of a BOLD scan.
Introduction
The use of intraoperative imaging devices may aid
surgeons in decision making during surgery to improve safety, efficiency and
clinical outcome. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is unchallenged in its soft
tissue contrast, but studies in this setting are generally limited due to
hardware and patient positioning restrictions. Resting state functional MRI
(rs-fMRI) allows for the visualization of resting state networks, which can
contribute further to identify important functional brain areas, but image
acquisition might be too long and not necessarily accepted during the
procedure. In a recent study, the use of Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) Perfusion
imaging for resection control was presented [1]. The data obtained from this
study was used in order to evaluate whether it is possible to calculate the
resting state networks (e.g. the motor cortex) during
anesthesia with limited equipment available in the operation theatre.Materials and Methods
The patient collective consists of 15 patients (4
women, 11 men, mean age 51.4 years) suffering from Glioblastoma Multiforme
(GBM). All underwent scanning intraoperatively on a 1.5T Intera scanner (Philips
Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with two one-channel circular
coils. More details can be found in [1]. The study was approved by the local
ethical committee. Scan parameters included: 1800ms labeling duration and 1800ms
post labeling delay, 2D multislice EPI scanning with 3.6x3.5x5mm³ resolution,
TR/TE: 2616/13ms, 40 label/control pairs. The images were post-processed using
the MELODIC toolbox of FSL (FMRIB, Oxford, UK) following the processing steps
as described in [2].Results and Discussion
The post-processed data shows activation of different
areas in the brain as expected. This includes for example the primary motor
cortex (Figure 1a) as well as the default mode network (Figure 2a). There is
substantial false-positive activation in the resection cavity that appeared in
each patient in different independent components (Figure 1b). Therefore, it is
currently difficult whether the resection site can be accurately mapped in terms
of functional areas. This information however might become important to spare
functional areas at the resection site. It is subject to further investigation
how to remove this false-positive noise and only visualize the actual resting
state.Conclusion
This
proof-of-principle study shows the feasibility of ASL data being used for
resting state network mapping during neurosurgery while patients are under the
influence of general anesthesia. While it is possible to obtain the same
information using dedicated rs-fMRI imaging, the ASL data provides perfusion
data (Figure 2b) and the resting state networks within a single scan and might
therefore be more accepted due to the faster acquisition. It remains subject to
further investigations whether the appearing noise at the rim of resection can
be removed to avoid false-positive activation and in further consequence
overlooking functional areas in the vicinity of the resection site.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Lindner T, Ahmeti H, Juhasz J, et al. A comparison of
arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for
resection control in glioblastoma surgery. Oncotarget. 2018;9(26):18570-18577.
Published 2018 Apr 6. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24970
[2] Chen JJ, Jann K, Wang DJ. Characterizing Resting-State Brain Function Using
Arterial Spin Labeling. Brain Connect. 2015;5(9):527-542.
doi:10.1089/brain.2015.0344