Wolfgang Kilian1, Rüdiger Brühl1, Yasser Abdulhadi1, and Bernd Ittermann1
1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Stable
and well characterized anthropomorphic MR-phantoms for quantitative MRI of T1
and T2 measurements are still lacking. We investigate the potential application
of additive manufacturing of silicone to produce multi-compartment MR-phantoms
with well characterized relaxation properties. Various two-component silicone
types with different mixture ratios were investigated. Additionally, the
influence of admixing colors to modulate relaxation times was studied. First bi-phasic
test samples were designed, produced by different commercial 3D printing sources,
and characterized.
Purpose
Phantoms are
of paramount importance for quantitative MRI and, so far, phantom work has
predominantly been targeting T1 and T2 relaxation times. Here, we aim for a new
approach to produce silicone-based, brain phantoms [1] utilizing the recent development
of soft-matter additive manufacturing [2]. The technique is already capable of
multi-component production [3], i.e. different ‘tissue-types’ can be intricately
printed without the need for containers or walls for separating the
compartments. This approach could open the path to anthropomorphic phantoms
which not only will keep their MR characteristics over years but also could be
produced ‘on-demand’.Methods
To implementing
additive manufacturing to phantom production, suitable 3D models have to be
generated fulfilling the process requirements. Most relevant is the minimal structure
size such systems can realize. A workflow was developed utilizing the open
source packages FreeSurfer, FreeView, SPM and 3DSlicer [4]. Thus, we were able
to choose minimal gray matter thickness and eliminate any structures smaller
than that (Fig. 1). Aside from the silicone approach shown here, this data-set was also used for other phantom production strategies [5,6].
Silicone is widely applied and exists in numerous types. Up to now we have characterized
room temperature vulcanization (RTV) two-component silicone from two different
suppliers (Elkem, Germany: RTV4511, RTV4530, ESA6018; Silikonfabrik, Germany:
SF00, SF13, SF33, Silixon10, Silglas10) with the recommended 1:1 mixture ratio
but also with off-label ratios as far as 1:2. Various color pastes were test
for further relaxation time adjustment. After vacuum degassing, the silicone
was filled in molds of approx. 6.5 cm diameter up to a height of 1.5 cm (Fig.
2 a). For material characterization, four such discs were stacked with equal
spacing (Fig. 2 b) and placed within a container filled with silicone oil
(Fig. 2 c). This assembly was imaged (4 to 7 mm slice thickness,
0.9 x 0.9 mm² in-plane resolution, 10 s TR) in a 3T scanner
(Siemens Verio) using an inversion recovery spin-echo sequence (25 – 6400 ms
TI) for T1 analysis and a spin-echo sequence (12 – 10000 ms TE) for
T2 analysis . Analysis was done offline applying single- or dual-exponential
decay fits to the magnitude images pixel-by-pixel for T2 analysis whereas the complex
data were used for T1 determination by fitting the signal sequence to the
function A+B*exp(-TI/T1) with A and B being complex numbers [7].Results
As a
general result, we observe a decreasing MR signal with increasing hardness of
the cured silicone type. Consequently, only the softest variant of the specific
type was further investigated. Compared to the surrounding silicone oil, these
soft silicone discs exhibit relative signal intensities of 50% to 80 % (Fig. 3c).
For the
softer silicone discs produced we observe T1 ≈ 0.9 - 1 s (Fig. 3a). Fitting the TE dependence of the spin-echo images with
a single exponential decay results in residuals with still significant
structure. Double-exponential fits eliminates this but do not easily converge
for the pixel-by-pixel analysis. After ROI averaging within each TE-image the
double-exponential fits converged well and all silicone types tested show a fast
T2-component in the range of 10 – 20 ms and a slower component
in the range of 70 – 300 ms (Fig. 3b, c).
Apart from
those mono-phasic discs, biphasic silicone samples were produced by commercial
3D-printing. A segment from the brain dataset with two homogeneous cubes added (Fig.
4 top left) was produced by the three companies with
unaltered silicone types they routinely work with (Fig. 4 top row, ACEO,
EnvisionTEC, SanDraw [3]) and measured in the scanner as described above. Apart
from the ACEO sample we again see the difference in signal intensity depending
on the silicone hardness. Almost no difference in T1 is seen between the silicone
used by EnvisionTec and SanDraw. Their silicone also show the fast and the slow
relaxing component in the T2 measurements.Discussion and Outlook
Soft
silicone types can be used for T1 phantoms and relaxation times comparable to
the human brain can be obtained by choosing the appropriate base material. Further
shortening of the T1 time could be achieved by adding graphite [1] or SPIOs. T2
relaxation turned out to be more complex as all tested silicone types show a fast
and a slowly relaxing component. However, double-exponential T2 relaxation has been
seen in tissue as well and T2 measurements are notoriously sensitive to experimental
details [8]. Thus, one would determine an effective T2 time, when applying a
mono-exponential decay fit, strongly dependent on the implemented echo times. As
strong differences in the amplitude ratio of the two components have been found,
a silicone mainly exhibiting the slow relaxation component may be found in not yet tested types. The application
of adapted silicone to commercial 3D-printing technology shows potential for
future production of on-demand 3D-printed MR phantoms.Acknowledgements
This project (QUIERO, grant number 18HLT05, quiero-project.eu) has received funding from the EMPIR programme co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.References
[1] M.
Chapa et al., “Realistic MRI phantom for T2 and Quantitative Susceptibility
Mapping”, in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020) 4270
[2] F. B.
Coulter et al., “Bioinspired Heart Valve Prosthesis Made by Silicone Additive
Manufacturing”, Matter 1 (2019) 266–279
[3] ACEO, Wacker
Chemie AG, Germany; EnvisionTEC GmbH, Germany; SanDraw Inc, Taiwan
[4] FreeSurfer:
surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu, SPM: www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm;
3DSlicer: www.slicer.org
[5] D.
Kilian et al. “En
Route to multiphasic anthropomorphic MR phantoms: An additive manufacturing
approach applying bio-printing techniques”, submitted to Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
[6] A.
Toria et al. “En
route to multiphasic anthropomorphic MR phantoms: A new mold-based approach
applying gel-based preparation to real MR-datasets geometries”, submitted to Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
[7] J. K.
Barral et al. “A robust methodology for in vivo T1 mapping”, MRM 64
(2010) 1057–1067
[8] G. J. Stanisz et al., “T1, T2
relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T”, MRM 54 (2005) 507–512