Manuel Schneider1, Sylvain Doussin1, Dieter Ritter1, and Martin Requardt1
1Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Our
main purpose was to quantify geometric image distortion due to reduced susceptibility
at 0.55T compared to 1.5T. Therefore, Bloch simulations of a digital phantom and
a 2D GRE sequence were performed. The simulations at both field strengths were calculated
twice: once without considering B0 susceptibility, and once considering B0
susceptibility artefacts. Additionally, 3D T2 SPACE images with high readout bandwidth as
well as echo-planar diffusion-weighted images were
obtained and compared in n=3 volunteers. Less geometric distortion due to B0
susceptibility artefacts was observed at 0.55T compared to higher field
strengths.
INTRODUCTION
Effective
radiation therapy relies on high geometric integrity of the MR image
information used for treatment planning. Apart from gradient system
non-idealities, main magnetic field inhomogeneities and patient-induced B0
susceptibility artefacts potentially lead to geometric distortion1.
B0 susceptibility is field strength dependent2, and lower field
strengths result in overall reduced absolute susceptibility3. The
goal of this study is to analyze the effect
of lower susceptibility on geometric image integrity of
a conventional GRE and an echo-planar
diffusion-weighted sequence by means of both digital simulations and in vivo
measurements.METHODS
Simulations:
Bloch simulations of a 2D
GRE sequence (voxel size = 1.5x1.5x3mm3, FoV = 288x288mm3,
acquisition matrix = 192x192, bandwidth = 350Hz/px) and a digital phantom4
were performed at 1.5T (TE = 3.5ms, TR = 7ms, flip angle = 20°) and 0.55T (TE =
4ms, TR = 8.9ms, flip angle = 30°). At both field strengths, two types of
simulations were performed. First, an ideal system (main magnetic field, RF
field, gradient fields, RX profile) is assumed, and B0 susceptibility effects
are turned off (termed “Simulation ideal”). The second simulation applied
similar parameters, but main magnet field inhomogeneities as provided by the
manufacturer and B0 susceptibility effects are turned on (termed “Simulation
B0”). The effect of B0 shimming was not simulated.
In vivo
Study: Three healthy volunteers (2 female, 1 male, age: 67±4 years, weight: 78±15 kg) were imaged at a 1.5T (MAGNETOM Sola, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen,
Germany) and a prototypical version
of a 0.55T scanner (MAGNETOM Free.Max, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance
Ltd., Shenzhen, China). Measurements at both field strengths covering the optic
nerve were performed directly one after another by means of dedicated head
coils. A 3D T2 turbo-spin-echo sequence (SPACE) was used to acquire
high-resolution data (voxel size = 1x1x1mm3, FoV = 268x268x176mm3,
acquisition matrix = 256x256x176) at 1.5T (TE = 292ms, TR = 1900ms, echo
spacing = 3.28ms, echo train duration = 758ms, acquisition time = 3min 13s) and
0.55T (TE = 412ms, TR = 3200ms, echo spacing = 4.68ms, echo train duration =
1076ms, acquisition time = 6min 38s). A high readout bandwidth of 651Hz/px was
applied, to minimize image distortion due to B0 inhomogeneity. Echo-planar diffusion-weighted images were
obtained at both field strengths, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps
were calculated. Parameters that influence geometric distortions due to B0
inhomogeneities were matched (voxel size = 1.4x1.4x4mm3, acquisition
matrix = 192x192x24, bandwidth = 766Hz/px, echo spacing = 1.53ms). Data
acquisition in ky direction was accelerated two-fold using GRAPPA. The
remaining imaging parameters included FoV = 268x268x119mm3, TE = 119ms,
TR = 5300ms, b-value 1 = 0 s/mm2, b-value 2 = 1000 s/mm2,
EPI factor = 154, and acquisition time = 2min 56s at both field strength. Additionally, quantitative B0
off-resonance field maps were calculated based on the phase differences of a
2-echo GRE sequence.
Evaluation: Gradient non-linearities have the same
impact on geometric integrity of the in vivo EPI and SPACE images.
Therefore, non-rigid registration between ADC and T2 SPACE reference images was
performed. Mean and standard deviation of the resulting distortion vectors
across all volunteers were used as a measure of ADC map distortion due to B0 field
inhomogeneities and susceptibility. Additionally, we report mean and standard
deviation of the minimal, maximal, and interquartile range (IQR) B0 off-resonance
values across all volunteers in Hz in a slice covering the optic nerve.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1 depicts reconstructed images
of the performed Bloch simulations for 1.5T (left) and 0.55T (right). Smaller
overall distortion in the simulations that consider B0 field inhomogeneities
(“Simulation B0”) compared to the ideal simulations can be observed at 0.55T
compared to 1.5T.
Figure 2 depicts resulting images of
the described in vivo study. Qualitatively, ADC maps acquired at 0.55T
allowed better delineation of structures in high-susceptibility regions, such
as the optic nerve. Quantitatively, imaging at 0.55T resulted
in reduced mean ADC map distortion in a slice covering the optic nerve across
all volunteers (1.8±0.3
mm) compared to ADC maps acquired at 1.5T (4.6±0.3 mm). Minimal,
maximal, and IQR off-resonance B0 map values of -40±8 Hz,
56.3±9 Hz, and 13±2 Hz
(at 1.5T) as well as -19±11 Hz, 28±4 Hz, and 5±1 Hz (at 0.55T) indicate smaller
B0 map variance at low field compared to higher fields.CONCLUSION
Imaging
with less geometric distortion due to B0 susceptibility artefacts to support
accurate MR in RT planning is achievable at 0.55T compared to higher field
strengths.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) Blumhagen, Jan O., et al. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 70.4 (2013): 1047-1057.
2) Haacke, E. Mark, et al. Magnetic
resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. Vol. 82. New York::
Wiley-Liss, 1999.
3) Campbell-Washburn, Adrienne E., et al. Radiology
293.2 (2019): 384-393.
4) J. W.
Massey and A. E. Yilmaz, “AustinMan and AustinWoman: High-fidelity, anatomical
voxel models developed from the VHP color images,” in Proc. 38th Annual
International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology
Society (IEEE EMBC), Orlando, FL, Aug. 2016.