Shawyon Chase Rohani1,2, Cara Morin1, Xiaodong Zhong3, Stephan Kannengiesser4, Joseph Holtrop1, Ayaz Khan1, Ralf Loeffler1,5, Claudia Hillenbrand1,5, Jane Hankins6, and Aaryani Tipirneni Sajja1,2
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States, 3Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, United States, 4MR Application Development, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany, 5University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 6Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
Synopsis
Radial acquisitions are less
motion sensitive and a viable alternative in patients unable to breath-hold. This
study investigates a free-breathing 3D Radial
Dixon technique to assess HIC by validating with 3D Cartesian Dixon and biopsy-calibrated
2D GRE method. All three acquisitions showed excellent correlation with each
other. The free-breathing 3D Radial Dixon produced sharper images whereas the 2D
GRE and 3D VIBE Cartesian-based techniques exhibited motion artifacts and a
slight underestimation in R2* values compared to 3D Radial VIBE likely due to
motion artifacts.
Introduction
Hepatic
iron content (HIC) is an important parameter that guides management of patients
with iron overload. Currently, non-invasive HIC assessment is performed based
on published R2*-MRI versus biopsy-HIC calibration curves.1,2,3 However, these curves were
derived by acquiring 2D multi-echo gradient echo (GRE) images from a single
central liver slice and calculating R2* by fitting a mono-exponential model,
which may produce inaccurate results in patients with co-existing fat.
Recently, 3D Dixon techniques and multi-spectral fat-water models have been
investigated for providing whole liver coverage and for simultaneous
quantification of R2* and fat-fraction (FF).4,5
However, these acquisition techniques are based on Cartesian sampling and require
the patient to perform a breath-hold for ~21 seconds to avoid breathing
artifacts. Alternatively, radial sampling is less motion sensitive and can produce
excellent image quality even in patients that are unable to perform a
breath-hold.4 The purpose of this
study is to investigate the performance of a free-breathing 3D Radial Dixon
technique and validate the HIC quantification with 3D Cartesian Dixon and
published 2D GRE biopsy calibration methods.Methods
MRI data was
collected from 25 patients aged 5 to 25 years who underwent imaging at 1.5T scanner
(MAGNETOM Avanto fit, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using (a) 2D GRE
(TR/TE/ΔTE 200/1.1/0.82ms, 20 echoes, α 35o, matrix 128x104, slice
thickness 10mm), (b) 3D Cartesian Dixon Cartesian VIBE (TR/TE/ΔTE 11/0.93/0.96ms,
8 echoes, α 5o, 1.37 mm x 1.37 mm x 3.5mm), and (c) Radial Dixon VIBE
(TR/TE/ΔTE 8.34/1.23/1.19ms, 6 echoes, α 5o, 1.52 mm x 1.52 mm x 5
mm). Quantitative R2* maps were calculated using a
published 2D GRE method as the reference standard.3 Both R2* and FF maps were produced inline for
3D Cartesian VIBE and were processed offline for 3D Radial VIBE based on an
adaptive multi-step fitting algorithm that is extended to account for magnitude
noise.5 For each technique, mean R2* and FF values
were calculated by drawing a large region-of-interest (ROI) and filtering out
blood vessels in Matlab.6 The mean R2* values were converted into
HIC values using a R2*-biopsy HIC calibration.3
R2*-HIC and FF values between each of the techniques were
compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results & Discussion
Of the 25 patients, 1 had fat-water swap and was excluded
from further analysis. Of the 24, 3 patients had FF>10% and were excluded
from R2* comparisons. Figure 1 shows magnitude images from all three
acquisitions in a representative sedated patient unable to breath-hold. The images
from the 2D GRE and 3D Cartesian Dixon showed motion artifacts (pointed out by
white arrows), whereas 3D Radial was more robust to motion artifacts and
produced a sharper image. As evident in Figs. 2 and 3, all three acquisitions
showed excellent correlation between each other and mean biases close to zero. However,
the R2* values for 2D GRE and 3D VIBE Cartesian-based techniques showed slight
underestimation compared to R2* values of 3D Radial VIBE due to motion
artifacts (Fig. 2). The FF values obtained with 3D Radial and Cartesian Dixon
sequences also showed high correlation with slope close to unity (Fig. 4). Conclusion
The excellent agreement between the 3D Radial Dixon
technique and the 3D Cartesian Dixon and 2D GRE techniques demonstrates that
the 3D Radial Dixon method can accurately estimate HIC for guiding iron
chelation therapy. The free-breathing 3D Radial Dixon will be a viable
alternative in patients unable to breath-hold by providing sharper images with less
motion artifacts compared to Cartesian-based techniques. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N, et
al. MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in
transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood. 2005;106(4):1460-1465.
2. Henninger B, Zoller H, Rauch S, et
al. R2* relaxometry for the quantification of hepatic iron overload:
biopsy-based calibration and comparison with the literature. RoFo :
Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin
2015;187(6):472-479.
3. Hankins JS, McCarville MB, Loeffler
RB, et al. R2* magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in patients with iron
overload. Blood. 2009;113(20):4853-4855.
4. Tipirneni-Sajja A, Krafft AJ,
McCarville MB, et al. Radial Ultrashort TE Imaging Removes the Need for
Breath-Holding in Hepatic Iron Overload Quantification by R2* MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(1):187-194.
5. Jhaveri KS, Kannengiesser SAR, Ward
R, Kuo K, Sussman MS. Prospective Evaluation of an R2* Method for Assessing
Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) Against FerriScan: Derivation of the Calibration
Curve and Characterization of the Nature and Source of Uncertainty in the
Relationship. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(5):1467-1474.
6. McCarville MB, Hillenbrand CM,
Loeffler RB, et al. Comparison of whole liver and small region-of-interest
measurements of MRI liver R2* in children with iron overload. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40(8):1360-1367.