Priyanka Tupe Waghmare1, Archith Rajan2, Shweta Prasad3, Jitender Saini4, Pramod Kumar Pal5, and Madhura Ingalhalikar6
1E &TC, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, India, 2Symbiosis Centre for Medical Image Analysis, Symbiosis Centre for Medical Image Analysis, Pune, India, 3Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, India, 4Department of Neuroimaging & Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, India, 5Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, India, 6Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis and Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, India
Synopsis
Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple
system atrophy (MSA), and progressive supra-nuclear palsy (PSP) are
neurodegenerative disorders which have parkinsonism as a
core clinical feature. In the early stages PD and atypical parkinsonian syndrome (APS) (MSA and PSP) may
often be indistinguishable and differential diagnosis is therefore crucial. Our
work employs radiomics
based features extracted from standard T1 weighted MRI images that are used in
a machine learning framework to differentiate PD from APS. Results demonstrate
a superior test accuracy of 92% that support our underlying hypothesis that radiomics on
T1-weighted images can provide a discriminatory feature space between PD and APS.
Introduction
PD, MSA and PSP are neurodegenerative disorders
which have parkinsonism as a core clinical feature [1]. MSA and PSP are classified as
atypical parkinsonian syndrome (APS) owing to the presence of specific symptoms
such as autonomic dysfunction in MSA, and early falls in PSP. However, these features become evident only a
few years into the illness. In the early
stages, PD, MSA and PSP, may often be indistinguishable based on the standard
clinical criteria. The present study aims to investigate
the feasibility of classifying these parkinsonian disorders, i.e., PD and APS
based on radiomic features extracted from standard clinical 3D T1 weighted
images. These images are routinely
acquired as part of a standard clinical scans owing to which they can be used for
differential diagnosis with relative ease.
We hypothesise that first order and texture based radiomics features
will illustrate region specific differences between PD and APS. Methods
Sixty-five
patients with PD, 61 patients with APS – MSA and PSP, and 75 healthy controls
(HC) were retrospectively recruited. 3D T1
TFE images were acquired on a Philips Achieva 3T with repetition time (TR) =
8.1 ms, echo time (TE)= 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8°, sense factor = 3.5, field of
view (FOV) = 256 × 256 × 155 mm, voxel size = 1×1×1 mm, slice thickness = 1 mm,
acquisition matrix=256×256x165 sagittal slices. Following acquisition, a standard
Freesurfer 6.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) [4] processing pipeline was applied to
the T1 structural images (Figure-1) where these were parcellated into 86 brain
regions based on the Desikan Killiany atlas [5]. Only 19 ROIs namely the brainstem,
bilaterally the cerebellar grey matter, cerebellar white matter, caudate,
putamen, pallidum, ventral diencephalon, thalamus and nucleus accumbens were
selected for radiomics computation. A
substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) atlas that used neuromelanin sensitive MR
images to delineate SNc bilaterally in the MNI space [6] was used to define SNc ROIs. Radiomics
features were computed using pyRadiomics library and included 18 First Order
features ,24 textural features from Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), 16
features from Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM),14 features from Gray Level
Dependence Matrix (GLDM),16 features from Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM)
and 5 features from Neighbouring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM). The data was divided into 80% training and
the remaining 20 % was used as the test set.
Random Forest based Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross Validation
(RF-RFECV) was employed for feature selection. A 5-fold CV was used on the
training set for cross-validations. With RF-RFECV, a total of 27
features each were considered optimal after a 5-fold CV for PD vs HC and PD vs
APS classification, whereas 37 features were considered optimal for
classification of HC vs APS. The random
forest was implemented using 10000 trees and maximum depth as 2. Testing of the model was done on the dataset
of n = 28 (HC vs APS), 26 (PD vs APS) and 28 (HC vs PD).
Results
Table 1
provides the demographic and clinical information of the dataset under
consideration. The radiomics based RF classifier for PD vs HC performed at a
test accuracy of 62%, (average CV accuracy=72%, Area under- ROC (AU-ROC) =
0.61) (Table-2). The test accuracy for
classifying APS vs HC was 86% (average CV accuracy = 90%, AU-ROC = 0.96). Finally, the test accuracy for PD vs APS was
92% (average CV accuracy = 92%, AU-ROC = 0.99). Figure-2 shows
the top-most radiomics based features obtained after RF classification. These included a mixture of first order, GLCM, GLDM and GLRLM
features. The top ROIs included the SNc,
ventral diencephalon, cerebellum, accumbens, caudate and putamen included regions that are known to
be involved in the pathogenesis of PD and APS. Figure 3 shows the regions of
interest from where the most important features were extracted.Conclusion
The clinical diagnosis of
parkinsonian disorders is often complicated in the early stages of illness
owing to similarities in clinical features [7] .However, by abstracting phenotypic
quantitative textural and intensity features which have a unique capability of
illustrating microstructural and tissue level alterations, employed into a
multivariate machine learning framework, our work demonstrated with a superior
accuracy, the feasibility of classifying parkinsonian disorders, i.e., PD and
APS based on standard clinical 3D T1 weighted images. ROI’s such as the
brainstem and cerebellum are specific to PSP and MSA whereas the basal ganglia
is a core component of both PD, and APS. The delineating features in PD vs HC
were mainly captured from the SNc followed by thalamus and ventral
diencephalon. In the comparison of PD vs APS, features were extracted from the ventral diencephalon and from the
cerebellum. The results obtained, expand
the possibility of the role of machine learning based classification techniques
in clinical practice. This may aid in the clinical diagnosis of PD and APS
which may often be indistinguishable in early stages of disease.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Williams
DR, Litvan I (2013) Parkinsonian syndromes. Continuum (Minneap Minn)
19:1189-1212
2 Lambin
P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical
imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749-762
3 van
Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B (2020) Radiomics
in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection. Insights
Imaging 11:91
4
Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C et al (2004) Automatically
parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14:11-22
5 Desikan
RS, Segonne F, Fischl B et al (2006) An automated labeling system for
subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of
interest. Neuroimage 31:968-980
6 Safai
A, Prasad S, Chougule T, Saini J, Pal PK, Ingalhalikar M (2020) Microstructural
abnormalities of substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease: A neuromelanin
sensitive MRI atlas based study. Human brain mapping 41:1323-1333
7 Hughes
AJ, Daniel SE, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lees AJ (2002) The accuracy of diagnosis of
parkinsonian syndromes in a specialist movement disorder service. Brain 125:861-870