Ya-Jun Ma1, Michael Carl2, Hyungseok Jang1, Saeed Jerban1, Eric Y Chang1,3, Seth Kligerman1, and Jiang Du1
1UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 2GE Healthcare, San Diego, CA, United States, 3VA Health system, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
MR
imaging of lung is challenging due to its short T2*
and low proton density. In this study, we proposed a free breathing
phase-resolved lung imaging technique using a 3D UTE sequence with an efficient
Cones trajectory. Five
different respiration phases were resolved using a self-navigator technique,
and the corresponding lung images were reconstructed with a combined parallel imaging and compressed sensing algorithm. Small pulmonary
vessels were well-displayed in these images.
Introduction
Computed tomography (CT), the golden standard modality for lung imaging,
offers excellent spatial and temporal resolution. However, due to the ionizing radiation exposure associated with CT, this
imaging modality is not recommended for pediatric patients or for patients
requiring longitudinal follow-up imaging (1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
meanwhile, shows excellent soft tissue contrast and avoids ionizing radiation
exposure, but is challenging for lung imaging due to its short T2*
and low proton density (2). Clinical MRI sequences, such as gradient recalled echo
(GRE) sequences with echo times (TEs) longer than 1 ms, suffer significant
signal loss in lung imaging. Ultrashort echo time sequences with TEs less than
100 µs have been used successfully in short T2/T2*
imaging (3) and demonstrated great potential for application in lung imaging. Phase-resolved
UTE lung imaging with self-navigation techniques have been developed by several
groups, with most research having focused on UTE imaging with a radial
trajectory (4-7). In this study, we propose a free breathing phase-resolved
lung imaging using a highly efficient Cones trajectory (8-9). This UTE sequence
employs a short rectangular pulse for signal excitation, followed by 3D spiral
trajectories sampled on the Cones which allow volumetric lung imaging in a
time-efficient way. Methods and Materials
The 3D UTE Cones sequence can be
found in Figure 1. A short rectangular pulse with a
duration of 20 μs is used for signal excitation of each spoke. This is followed
by a ramp-sampling
with a minimal nominal TE of 32 µs. The
gradient encoding forms a spiral k-space trajectory with 3D conical
view ordering (8-9). For the lung imaging (see Figure 2), a bit-reversed algorithm
was used to randomize the gradient encoding ordering in Cones (5). The image in
the first row in Figure 2 illustrates the 3D k-space including all the Cones
spokes. The second row of Figure 2 shows the k-space trajectories in different
phase groups. The randomly ordered data sampling ensures each group of spokes
is uniformly distributed in k-space.
The sequence was implemented on a 3T GE
MR750 scanner. A 32-channel abdomen coil was used for signal reception (body
coil was used for signal excitation). Four male volunteers (aged 28- to 47-years-old)
were recruited in this study. During the scan, each volunteer was asked to
breathe normally. The 3D UTE Cones sequence employed the
following parameters: coronal plane, TR/TE = 4/0.032 ms, field of view (FOV) = 36×36×18
cm3, acquisition matrix = 240×240×120, flip angle (FA) = 4º, and
scan time = 6 min.
The respiration was estimated from the
phase of the center of k-space (e.g., the first point, also called the DC
term). A low pass filter was applied to the raw phase and the cut-off frequency
was ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 Hz (7). The filtered respiration curve was then segmented
into five phases and the lung images in each phase were reconstructed using a
combined parallel imaging and compressed sensing algorithm (10).Results and Discussion
Figure 3
shows the estimated respiration using the phase of DC acquired
from a 37-year-old healthy male volunteer. Panel A shows the raw phase of DC
(i.e., the blue curve) received from a coil close to the liver. The red curve
in panel A is the corresponding low pass-filtered phase representing the
respiration. The respiration was segmented into five phases as shown with green
lines in panel B. Phases 1 and 5 correspond to the end of inspiration and expiration,
respectively.
Figure 4
shows the representative sagittal images of the five
different respiratory motion phases from the same volunteer. The green and blue
lines denote the location of the diaphragms at end-expiration and end-inspiration,
respectively. All the phase-resolved images displayed the small lung vessels
very well. The images at the end expiration show the best quality with a sharp
vessel boundary.
Figure 5
shows the maximum intensity projection (MIP) lung
images reconstructed from the end-expiration phase. The small pulmonary vessels
are well-displayed in these images.Conclusion
The 3D UTE Cones sequence with a randomized
ordering scheme can provide self-navigated and phase-resolved high-resolution
lung imaging, which may be potentially useful in clinical practice.Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge grant support from NIH (R01AR062581,
R01AR068987, R01AR075825, and R21AR075851), VA Clinical Science and
Rehabilitation Research and Development Services (Merit Awards I01CX001388 and
I01RX002604), and GE Healthcare. References
1.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al.
Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia
and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505.
2.
Wielpütz M, Kauczor HU. MRI of the lung: state
of the art. Diagnostic and interventional radiology. 2012 Jul 1;18(4):344.
3.
Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder M, Bydder GM.
Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. Journal of
computer assisted tomography. 2003 Nov 1;27(6):825-46.
4.
Togao O, Tsuji R, Ohno Y, Dimitrov I, Takahashi
M. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI of the lung: assessment of tissue density in
the lung parenchyma. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:1491–1498.
5.
Johnson KM, Fain SB, Schiebler ML, Nagle S.
Optimized 3D ultrashort echo time pulmonary MRI. Magn Reson Med
2013;70:1241–1250.
6.
Feng L, Delacoste J, Smith D, Weissbrot J, Flagg
E, Moore WH, Girvin F, Raad R, Bhattacharji P, Stoffel D, Piccini D.
Simultaneous evaluation of lung anatomy and ventilation using 4D respiratory‐motion‐resolved
ultrashort echo time sparse MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019
Feb;49(2):411-22.
7.
Jiang W, Ong F, Johnson KM, Nagle SK, Hope TA,
Lustig M, Larson PE. Motion robust high resolution 3D free‐breathing pulmonary MRI using dynamic 3D image self‐navigator. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2018
Jun;79(6):2954-67.
8.
Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG. Design
and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn Reson Med
2006;55:575–582.
9.
Carl M, Bydder GM, Du J. UTE
imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a
time-efficient multi-spoke inversion recovery pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med 2016
Aug;76(2):577-82.
10.
Ma YJ, Searleman AC, Jang H,
Wong J, Chang EY, Corey-Bloom J, Bydder GM, Du J. Whole-Brain Myelin Imaging
Using 3D Double-Echo Sliding Inversion Recovery Ultrashort Echo Time (DESIRE
UTE) MRI. Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):362-74.