Zekang Ding1, Huajun She1, and Yiping Du1
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
In original iMoCo
algorithm, a single frame image was reconstructed by solving the iMoCo reconstruction
model including the estimated motion fields and TGV sparse constraint. Since motion
fields is critical in iMoCo algorithm, errors in motion estimation would deteriorate
the final reconstructed image. In this study, we improved the performance of
iMoCo through (1) reconstructing the full resolution dynamic images for motion
estimation, (2) estimating motion fields through nonrigid group-wise
registration, and (3) using a motion state weighted iMoCo reconstruction model. Residual
streaking artifacts and certain image blurring were suppressed using the proposed
algorithm in comparison with the original iMoCo.
Introduction
The original iMoCo (iterative Motion Compensation) reconstruction 1 relies on the motion fields estimated from motion-resolved images reconstructed by XD-GRASP
method.2 A single frame image was reconstructed by
solving the iMoCo reconstruction model including the estimated motion fields
and a total generalized variation (TGV) sparse constraint. iMoCo has shown the
capability to achieve high resolution and SNR lung images without introducing
motion artifacts. However, iMoCo also depends on accurate motion estimation;
errors in the motion fields would propagate to the final reconstructed image,
causing blurring or ghosting artifacts.1 On the other hand, in the original iMoCo
reconstruction model (Equation 1, N is the number of coils and M is the number
of motion states, $$$T_k$$$ is transformation from reference state to motion
state k), different motion states data have the same influence on the final
reconstructed image $$$\widehat{X } $$$which would cause blurring in the final result
due to registration error of images in different motion states. In this study,
we aim to improve the performance of iMoCo reconstruction through (1) reconstructing
the full resolution dynamic images for motion estimation using XD-GRASP-Pro,3 (2) estimating motion
fields through nonrigid group-wise registration using a Lagrangian
3D+t B-splines transformation model 4 which takes
both spatial and temporal smoothness of the motion into account, and (3) using
an improved motion state weighted iMoCo reconstruction model. The performance
of the proposed algorithm was tested for free breathing pulmonary MRI in comparison
with the original iMoCo.
$$\rm
arg\min_\widehat{X} \sum_{i,k}^{N,M} \left\|W(FS_i T_k \widehat{X
}-y_{ik})\right\|_2^2+ λ_s TGV(\widehat{X }),(1)$$Methods
Figure 1 shows the workflow
of improved iMoCo reconstruction. Motion-resolved k-space data were obtained through
the same strategy used in original iMoCo which is binning the data into
different motion states according to respiratory signal estimated using a k0/DC
navigator.5 Given the full
resolution motion-resolved k-space data, full resolution dynamic image series were
reconstructed using XD-GRASP-Pro. A nonrigid group-wise registration using a Lagrangian
3D+t B-splines transformation model was then performed on the whole
motion-resolved image series to simultaneously estimate motion fields from
every motion state to the reference state. In the final reconstruction step, an
improved reconstruction model (Equation 2) was used in which different motion
states data consistency term multiply a weighted coefficient $$$α_k$$$ to adjust the influence of registration error
of different motion states on the final result $$$T_k$$$.
The value of $$$α_k$$$ is given in Equation 3, the larger the temporal
distance, the smaller the value of $$$α_k$$$.
$$\rm
arg\min_\widehat{X} \sum_{i,k}^{N,M}α_k \left\|W(FS_i T_k \widehat{X
}-y_{ik})\right\|_2^2+ λ_s TGV(\widehat{X }),(2)$$
$$α_k=M×\frac
{e-e^{\frac {r|k-ref|}{M}}}{\sum_{t=1}^M\left(e-e^{\frac {r|t-ref|}M} \right)},0≤r≤\frac M{M-1},(3)$$
The proposed technique was evaluated in four free breathing pulmonary
MRI datasets which were acquired using a 3D golden-angle half radial UTE sequence
with hard pulse excitation on a 3T MR scanner (uMR790, United Imaging
Healthcare, Shanghai, China). Detailed imaging parameters are: TR/TE = 3.3/0.07ms,
FOV = 400×250×280mm3, voxel size = 1.14×1.14×1.14mm3, flip angle = 4°, a total of 106496 spokes were acquired during free breathing and
the total scan time was 6 minutes. Both original and improved iMoCo reconstructions
were performed on the pulmonary datasets with number of motion states M = 8. In
order to evaluate key components of improved iMoCo, three improved terms:
XD-GARSP-Pro (K = 5), group-wise registration and motion state weighted iMoCo
reconstruction model (r = 1.14) were cumulatively added into the original iMoCo
workflow referred to as iMoCo1, iMoCo2 and iMoCo3. The smoothness of transformation
$$$T$$$ was measured as the irregularity of the ROI points
trajectories:
$$Irr(p_r )=\frac1 M \sum_{k=1} ^M\left\| \frac{∂^2 T_k (p_r)}{∂k^2
}\right\|^2,(4)$$
with $$$p_r$$$ ROI point at the reference time point. Higher
values mean more irregular/ less smooth trajectories.4Results and Discussion
Figure 2 illustrates the
motion fields from each motion state to reference state (ref =1) and Irr value derived
from original iMoCo, iMoCo1 and iMoCo2. iMoCo2 including XD-GRASP-Pro and
group-wise registration produced smoother spatial and temporal motion fields. Figure
3 shows the reconstruction results of different methods. Residual streaking artifacts
can be observed in the images reconstructed using the original iMoCo. After
using XD-GRASP-Pro reconstruct full resolution dynamic images, the streaking
artifacts in final reconstruction results of iMoCo1 are still observable. By
using group-wise registration on the dynamic images reconstructed by
XD-GRASP-Pro, the streaking artifacts are suppressed effectively in iMoCo2
results. iMoCo3 which used a motion state weighted reconstruction model showed
similar results with iMoCo2 primarily due to the negligible registration error on
the showed positions. Figure 4 illustrates the registration results after
performing group-wise registration (ref = 1). The registration error of yellow
arrows labeled region is increased with the increased temporal distance between
reference state and others. Figure 5 shows the comparison between iMoCo2 and
iMoCo3 when large registration error in Figure 4 is occurred. Image blurring
around diaphragm is reduced effectively using the improved reconstruction model.Conclusion
This study demonstrated the
initial performance of the improved iMoCo reconstruction. The improved iMoCo
employs XD-GRASP-Pro, group-wise registration and a motion state weighted iMoCo
reconstruction model. Compared to the original iMoCo, the improved reconstruction
is able to suppress residual streaking artifacts caused by high undersampling
ratio and reduce image blurring resulted from certain large registration error
effectively.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. X. Zhu, M. Chan, M. Lustig, K.
M. Johnson, P. E. Z. Larson, Iterative motion-compensation reconstruction
ultra-short TE (iMoCo UTE) for high-resolution free-breathing pulmonary MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2020;83:1208-1221.
2. L. Feng et al., XD-GRASP: Golden-angle radial MRI with reconstruction of
extra motion-state dimensions using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:775-788.
3. L.Feng et al., GRASP-Pro: imProving Golden-angle Radial MRI through a Self-Estimated Subspace. ISMRM Workshop 2020, Sedona, AZ, USA.
4. C. T. Metz, S. Klein, M.
Schaap, T. van Walsum, W. J. Niessen, Nonrigid registration of dynamic medical
imaging data using nD plus t B-splines and a groupwise optimization approach. Med Image Anal. 2011;15: 238-249.
5. S. Weick et al., DC-gated high resolution three-dimensional lung imaging
during free-breathing. Journal Of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2013;37:727-732.