Xiaolin Guo1,2, lixia Qian2, Yueluan Jiang3, and Zhongshuai Zhang4
1Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China, 2Department of Radiology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China, 3MR Scientific Marketing, Diagnosis Imaging, Siemens Healthineers China, Beijing, China, 4MR Scientific Marketing, Diagnosis Imaging, Siemens Healthineers China, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Advanced DWI
techniques, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and intravoxel incoherent motion
(IVIM), can complement physiological information to morphological information
that was obtained with conventional MRI This study investigated the application
of DKI and IVIM in diagnosis of active sacroiliitis with ankylosing
spondylitis.
Synopsis
Advanced DWI
techniques, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and intravoxel incoherent motion
(IVIM), can complement physiological information to morphological information
that was obtained with conventional MRI This study investigated the application
of DKI and IVIM in diagnosis of active sacroiliitis with ankylosing
spondylitis.Introduction
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with
unclear etiology of sacroiliitis and spondylitis, which is characterized as persistently alternations
between the active and the chronic stage [1]. The progression of AS is closely
related to hla-27, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-17 [2]. At present,
the treatment of AS is based on anti-tumor necrosis factor - α (TNF - α),
therefore, the staging of inflammation of AS is important in clinical practice
[3]. Clinical assessment of AS is as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and
Creactive protein (CRP), while study have shown that up to 40% of patients with
AS in active stage did not show increased CRP or ESR [5]. MRI is a sensitive
and noninvasive imaging method that can detect the activity in sacroiliitis
with As, and advanced diffusion models, such as DKI and IVIM, can be used as an
effective tool for diagnosing the activity of AS, especially in monitoring AS
therapy [1]. This study evaluated the diagnosis value of DKI and IVIM in
distinguish active or stable stage of sacroiliitis with ankylosing spondylitis.Methods
In total, 43 patients (average age 30.93 ± 9.533
years, 31 males, 12 females) with AS were enrolled in this study and divided
into active group (23 cases) and chronic group (20 cases). The criteria of
clinical and laboratory tests to determine the active and chronic group were as
follows: for the active group, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity
Index (BASDAI) average score≥6 or between 4.0 and 6.0 with ESR≥20 mm/h or CRP≥3
mg/L; for the chronic group BASDAI average score < 4.0 or between 4.0 and 6.0 with ESR
<20mm/h or CRP≤3mg/h. All patients underwent MRI scan on a 3T MR scanner
(MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using 32-channel body
coil with abdominal strap. Coronal T1WI-TSE and T2WI-fs images of bilateral
sacroiliac joints were acquired. The diffusion imaging based on single shot
echo planar imaging (SE-EPI) was obtained with 3 scan trace mode, with 10 b values
(0, 50, 100,150,200,300,600,900,1200, 1500 mm2/s). The sequence parameters were
as follows: TR= 3910ms, TE= 71ms, PAT= 2, FOV= 320 × 320mm2, matrix= 128 × 128;
slice thickness:3mm. The parameters derived from DKI and IVIM were calculated
by a prototype software (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), including Mean
Diffusion (MD) and Mean Kurtosis (MK), and IVIM parameters includes Pure
diffusion (D), Pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*) and Perfusion
fraction(f). For each patient, the
maximum cross-sectional area of lesion was manually drawn on each of DKI and
IVIM metric maps as the region of interest (ROI) by visual inspection according
to T2WI-fs and B=600mm2/s diffusion images, which were more than 1 mm away from
the edge of the lesions, avoided blood vessels, bone cortex, bone destruction
area, cystic change area and sclerotic area. Differences in all diffusion
parameters between active stage and chronic stage were compared using the
independent sample t test, and the diagnostic effectiveness was evaluated by
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results
As shown in Table 1, between active group and chronic group,
significant differences was observed in DWI-ADC, DKI-based MD and MK, and
IVIM-based D and f(p<0.05). One representative case is shown in Figure 1 and
Figure 2. Figure 3 and Table 2 demonstrated that the AUCs of ADC, DKI-MK,
DKI-DK, IVIM-D and IVIM-f were all above 0.7, and the DKI-MK achieved the
highest AUC (0.895) and specificity (0.9) in the diagnosis of active sacroiliitis
with ankylosing spondylitis.Discussion and Conclusion
Ankylosing spondylarthritis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that
involves the axial joints and entheses, and the diagnosis and treatment of
active sacroiliitis with ankylosing spondylitis can significantly improve
patients’ living quality. Currently, the diagnosis of AS based on CRP and ESR
have certain limitation, therefor it is essential to find a noninvasive and
sensitive method for early diagnosis. This study applied IVIM and DKI advanced
diffusion imaging techniques to quantitively diagnosis the active sacroiliitis
with AS. The results show IVIM-DWI and DKI are feasible for diagnosis of SIJ
activity of AS. Among these parameters, DKI-MK is the most valuable parameter
in differentiation of active or chronic stage of AS.Acknowledgements
None.References
1. Zhao YH,Li SL,Liu ZY,et al.Detection of Active
Sacroiliitis with Ankylosing Spondylitis through Intravoxel Incoherent Motion
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging[J].European Radiology,2015,25(9):2754-2763.
2. Pedersen SJ, Maksymowych WP.The Pathogenesis of
Ankylosing Spondylitis: an Update[J].Current Rheumatology
Reports,2019,21(10):1-10.
3. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Godolias G, Böhm H (2005)
Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis – a review Part I: Conventional medical
treatment and surgical therapy. Scand J Rheumatol 34:97–108.
4. Zochling J, Braun J, van der Heijde D (2006)
Assessments in ankylosing spondylitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20:521–537.