3076

Single-shot T2 mapping in severe head motion with multiple overlapping-echo detachment planar imaging
Qinqin Yang1, Jiechao Wang1, Qizhi Yang1, Shuhui Cai1, Hongjian He2, Congbo Cai1, Zhong Chen1, and Jianhui Zhong2,3
1Department of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, 2The Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis, and the Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 3Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States

Synopsis

Subject motion often leads to serious quality degradation of MR images, especially in quantitative MRI. In this study, a novel reconstruction method was proposed for single-shot T2 mapping based on overlapping-echo detachment planar imaging and synthetic-data-driven learning (SDDL). This method was made robust to severe motion by improved parallel reconstruction and motion correction methods without extra scan. The proposed method was evaluated with human brain experiments. The results show that SDDL-based method can significantly reduce ghosting and motion artifacts in T2 maps in the presence of randomly and continuously subject movement.

Introduction

Quantitative T2 mapping is usually time consuming and sensitive to subject motion as it is dependent on repeated sampling with different contrast weighting information1,2, which makes it difficult for dynamic imaging. Overlapping-echo detachment (OLED) planar imaging3-5, proposed by our group, has been successfully applied in single-shot quantitative T2 mapping with high accuracy, which tremendously improves the acquisition efficiency. However, the effect of motion during the OLED acquisition has not been fully investigated, especially when the parallel imaging technique6,7 is applied. Herein, we combine OLED imaging with parallel acquisition and motion correction, to achieve fast quantification of T2 in severe head motion. Meanwhile, we developed a synthetic-data-driven learning (SDDL) approach based on forward model for reconstruction of T2 maps by generating simulated training data for different learning tasks to solve the problem of imperfect or insufficient data.

Methods

Pulse sequence: Figure 1A shows the sequence diagram of OLED acquisition. The four excitation pulses with a same flip angle α followed by refocusing pulse with a flip angle of β. The echo-shifting gradients G1, G2, G3 and G4 are used to shift the four echoes from the k-space center. Therefore, four echo signals were obtained with different evolution time at the same k-space data collection.
Experiments: In vivo data were acquired from healthy volunteers, on a whole-body MRI system at 3T with a 20-channel head coil (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Health care, Erlangen, Germany). Participants were instructed for three scans: (1) reference scan, (2) no head motion scan, and (3) continuous motion scan. The acquisition parameters were as follows: field of view = 22×22 cm2, voxel size = 1.72×1.72 mm2, slice thickness = 3 mm, TR = 8000 ms, and slice number = 21. A GRAPPA acceleration rate of 2 was used to accelerate the acquisition. The pulse sequence and parameters used in simulation were the same as those used in experiments.
Parallel reconstruction: The proposed calibrationless parallel reconstruction approach is shown in Figure 1B. A U-Net was used to recover the multi-coil full-sampled images from undersampled images after navigator-based linear phase correction. Figure 2A shows the synthesis workflow of data for network training, which relays on the forward operator P=F-1ΦFCB of parallel imaging, F is the Fourier operator, C applies coil sensitivities, B is the Bloch simulation and Φ is the sampling pattern. The coil sensitivity maps used in training phase were generated by ESPIRiT algorithm8 from several ACS data collected offline. ACS data is not needed in testing phase.
T2 mapping with motion correction and estimation: Convolutional neural network has shown the capability of nonlinear mapping from overlapping-echo image to corresponding T2 mapping.4,5 To reduce the negative impact of subject movement, rigid motion was considered in this study. The forward operator E=F-1BTvRθ of rigid motion is shows in Figure 2B, in which Tv and Rθ are translation operator and rotation operator, respectively. The phase accumulation due to motion during data acquisition can be represented by:
$$Δ\phi(\mathbf{r})= \gamma\left[\left(x-x'\right)\cdot G_{x}\left(t\right)+\left(y-y'\right)\cdot G_{y}\left(t\right)+\left(z-z'\right)\cdot G_{z}\left(t\right)\right]\cdot t $$
In which, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, G(t) is the linear gradient field, x', y' and z' are transformed by motion matrix:
$$\begin{bmatrix}x' \\y' \\z'\end{bmatrix}=T_{v}R_{\theta}\begin{bmatrix}x \\y \\z\end{bmatrix}$$
Over 20,000 training samples with size of 256×256 were employed for network training, among which around 15,000 samples were simulated with motion and 5,000 samples without motion.

Results

Figure 3 shows the results of numerical brain with/without rigid motion. The reconstructed T2 maps and motion fields are very close to the corresponding references. The normalized mean squared error (NMSE) of all pixels (excluding the regions of the background and cerebrospinal fluid) between T2 maps and reference are all reduced with motion correction in the presence of simulated motion. The results of simulation experiments show strong robustness to translational motion and rotational motion.
Figure 4 illustrates the results of in vivo experiments from two subjects. The GRAPPA cases suffer from ghosting artifacts, while motion artifacts are similar to those observed in the simulations before the correction. The proposed parallel reconstruction method reduces ghost artifacts and the motion correction method eliminates motion artifacts.
Figure 5 illustrates the results of T2 maps and motion estimation from a continuous motion scan. The scan time is 125 ms per slice and 9 measurements were applied. As shown in Figure 5A, the T2 maps scanned in different time courses maintain high consistency after coregistration, while there is slightly different distortion caused by altered inhomogeneous field under motion. Figure 5B shows that the T2 values calculated from four regions of interest (ROIs) are quite consistent. The results of corresponding motion vector field are given in Figure 5C.

Discussion and conclusion

The proposed SDDL-based method shows excellent performance against motion artifacts in both simulation and in vivo human brain experiments. The combination of calibrationless parallel reconstruction and motion correction provides ghost-free T2 maps in the presence of severe head motion. This method makes quantitative T2 mapping applicable to patients who cannot keep motionless during MRI scan, such as elderly people, children or populations that suffer from epilepsy. Future work includes refinement of motion estimation, correction of non-rigid motion and more parametric mapping.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant numbers 81671674, 11775184 and 82071913, and Leading (Key) Project of Fujian Province, 2019Y0001.

References

1. Chu ML, Chang HC, Oshio K, et al. A single-shot T2 mapping protocol based on echo-split gradient-spin-echo acquisition and parametric multiplexed sensitivity encoding based on projection onto convex sets reconstruction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018; 79(1):383-393.

2. Wang FYX, Dong ZJ, Reese TG, et al. Echo planar time-resolved imaging (EPTI). Magn. Reson. Med. 2019; 81(6):3599-3615.

3. Cai CB, Zeng YQ, Zhuang YC, et al. Single-shot T2 mapping through overlapping-echo detachment (OLED) planar imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering 2017; 64: 2450-2461.

4. Cai CB, Wang C, Zeng Y et al. Single-shot T2 mapping using overlapping-echo detachment planar imaging and a deep convolutional neural network. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018; 80: 2202-2214.

5. Zhang J, Wu J, Chen SJ, et al. Robust single-shot T2 mapping via multiple overlapping-echo acquisition and deep neural network. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2019; 38: 1801-1811.

6. Baron CA, Beaulieu C. Motion robust GRAPPA for echo-planar imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2016; 75: 1166-1174.

7. Shin PJ, Larson PEZ, Ohliger MA, et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014; 72: 959-970.

8. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et al. ESPIRiT-an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014; 71: 990-1001.

Figures

Figure 1. (A) Single-shot OLED sequence for overlapping-echo imaging. The four excitation pulses have a same flip angle α=30° and the refocusing pulse with a flip angle of β=180°. G1, G2, G3 and G4 are echo-shifting gradients for OLED encoding. (B) Framework of the proposed parallel reconstruction and motion correction and estimation for T2 mapping. Five-level U-Net is used for nonlinear mapping in these three learning tasks. LPC: Linear phase correction. MoCo: Motion correction.

Figure 2. Synthesis workflow of training data. (A) Forward operator P=F-1ΦFCB of parallel imaging. Xin and Xout form a data pair, which can be used to train the neural network for image anti-aliasing. (B) Forward operator E=F-1BTvRθ of motion simulation. F is the Fourier operator, C applies coil sensitivities, B is the Bloch simulation, Φ is the sampling pattern, Tv and Rθ are translation operator and rotation operator, respectively.

Figure 3. Example mapping results from the simulated motion pattern of numerical brain. (A) The T2 and M0 map of numerical brain from BrainWeb used for Bloch simulation and as ground truth. (B) Results of T2 maps and velocity fields obtained using SDDL reconstruction from data without simulated motion (row 1), with translational motion (row 2) and with rotational motion (row 3). The regions of the background and cerebrospinal fluid are not considered when error is calculated. The B0 inhomogeneity was not considered in the numerical brain experiments.

Figure 4. In vivo results of different slices with in-plane motion for subjects 1 and 2. First column: GRAPPA reconstruction maps without motion correction. Second column: SDDL reconstruction maps without motion correction. Third column: SDDL reconstruction maps with motion correction. SDDL: synthetic-data-driven learning.

Figure 5. (A) T2 mapping results of representative slices with continuous motion for subjects 1. (B) Mean T2 value curves from 4 ROIs (marked with red circles) of the 9 measurements in (A). The first image was selected as reference for coregistration. (C) The velocity field of the 9 measurements in (A) and representative example of motion vector field (highlighted with red dotted line) reconstructed.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 29 (2021)
3076