Garret M. Powell1, Robert J. Spinner2,3, Benjamin M. Howe1, Matthew A. Frick1, Andrew J. Fagan1, Venkata V. Chebrolu4, Peter D. Kollasch4, Eric G. Stinson4, Joel P. Felmlee1, and Kimberly K. Amrami1,2
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 3Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 4Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
Clinical MSK imaging at 7T is advantageous as a
result of increased signal to noise ratio, contrast resolution, and spatial
resolution compared to lower field strengths. Nevertheless, we have identified
several challenges when performing MSK imaging at this field strength including
inferior image uniformity, artifacts, coil limitations, and concealed
pathology. The purpose of this exhibit is to introduce our early clinical
experience with MSK imaging at 7T and illustrate the challenges we have
identified.
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging at 7T offers superior
characteristics, such as increased signal to noise ratio, as compared to lower
field strengths. These features are especially pertinent to MSK imaging where
detailed evaluation of small structures is required. Even though the
application of MSK imaging at 7T is promising, there are unique clinical
challenges when imaging at this field strength. The purpose of this exhibit is
to introduce our early clinical experience with MSK imaging at 7T and
illustrate the challenges we have identified.Methods
Review our early clinical MSK imaging experience
and challenges with examinations performed at 7T.Results
Illustrated clinical examples demonstrate the
clinical utility, diagnostic advantages, and challenges of performing MSK
examinations at 7T.Discussion
Examinations performed at 7T have the advantage of
increased signal to noise ratio, contrast resolution, and spatial resolution
compared to lower field strengths. This degree of anatomic and pathologic detail
is particularly important with regard to MSK imaging as characterization of
ligamentous, cartilaginous, and peripheral nerve pathology can have management
implications and influence surgical and biopsy planning. Despite these
advantages, there are several clinical challenges and limitations to imaging at
7T. Patient safety concerns include the potential to cause RF-induced tissue
heating near implanted metallic devices and increased effects on the
vestibular system1,2. Poor B1+
field uniformity is an inherent challenge which affects image quality, but can
be mitigated using high permittivity dielectric pads3. MSK MR examinations rely on non-fat suppressed
imaging to detect common pathology such as meniscal tears which may be less
conspicuous at 7T due to alterations in tissue contrast compared with
conventional imaging at 1.5T or 3T. Artifacts such as chemical shift and fine
line artifacts are more apparent at 7T and can be difficult to manage. Coil
limitations restrict the number of joints which can be evaluated, alter
anatomic relationships as a result of coil construction, and require modified
positioning4. Routine MSK pathology, such as meniscal tears,
are sometimes less conspicuous at 7T and require innovative post-processing
techniques to mitigate5.Conclusion
Increased signal to noise ratio and resolution
are the primary advantages to imaging at 7T with important applications to
clinical MSK imaging. Despite the evolution in technology, there are unique
challenges facing MSK imaging at 7T which require further innovation and collaboration
to resolve.Acknowledgements
NoneReferences
1. Fagan AJ, Amrami
KK, Welker KM, Frick MA, Felmlee JP, Watson RE, Jr. Magnetic Resonance Safety
in the 7T Environment. Magnetic resonance
imaging clinics of North America. 2020;28(4):573-582.
2. Fagan AJ, Bitz AK,
Björkman-Burtscher IM, et al. 7T MR Safety. Journal
of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020.
3. Fagan AJ, Welker KM, Amrami KK, et
al. Image Artifact Management for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging on a 7 T
Scanner Using Single-Channel Radiofrequency Transmit Mode. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(12):781-791.
4. Chebrolu VV, Kollasch PD, Deshpande
V, et al. Uniform combined reconstruction of multichannel 7T knee MRI receive
coil data without the use of a reference scan. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(5):1534-1544.
5. Chebrolu VV, Kollasch PD, Stinson E,
et al. Subtle Intensity Graduating Homomorphic Transform (SIGHT) with Small
Percentage Fat-saturation to Improve Conspicuity of Meniscal Tears at 7T. Proceedings_ISMRM. 2019:2801.