Yongxian Qian1, Gregory Chang1, Eric J. Strauss2, and Fernando E. Boada1
1Radiology, New York University, New York, NY, United States, 2Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
This human subject study presents preliminary results demonstrating the
great potential of ultra-high resolution (0.14mm) UTE imaging to simultaneously
visualize daily movement active tissues in the knee joint, including
cartilages, menisci, ligaments, tendons, and even the chondro-osseous
junctions. Non-invasive observation of these functional tissues are critical to
understanding mechanisms of the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA).
INTRODUCTION
Recent studies have
suggested that osteoarthritis (OA), especially post-traumatic OA, in the knee involves
multiple functional components of the joint, such as cartilage, meniscus,
ligament, tendon, and even the chondro-osseous junction.1-3 The onset and progression of OA may result from
a comprehensive interaction among these functional tissues.4-5 It
is unknown under what mechanisms these interactions lead to OA.6 Technical limitations hinder non-invasive studies on humans. Ultrashort echo
time (UTE) MRI has the potential to non-invasively visualize these functional tissues
of uniquely short T2 relaxation time.7-10 However, the UTE
MRI performance is compromised at 3T when ultra-high resolution (0.14mm) is pursued
to detect subtle defects and alterations in these tissues due to low
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).7 The 7T MRI doubles the SNR compared with
the 3T 11 and would fully unleash the power of UTE imaging. Here we
demonstrate such advantages for these critical functional tissues in the knee
joint. METHODS
Five healthy subjects
(age 28–58 years, male/female 2/3) were studied on a 7T whole-body MRI scanner (MAGNETOM
7T, Siemens) with a 28-channel Tx/Rx knee coil (QED, Ohio). IRB approval
and written informed consents were obtained. A custom-developed 3D UTE sequence, acquisition-weighted stack of
spirals (AWSOS),12 was used for data acquisition with optimized
parameters: FOV=140x140x120 mm3, matrix size=1024x1024x60, resolution=0.14x0.14x2
mm3, flip angle=13°, fatsat=on, TE/TR=0.6/53ms,
spirals =250, spiral readout Ts=16.72ms, and TA=13min34sec. The image
reconstruction was implemented offline (due to the limited computation capacity
of the scanner, version VB17A) with a custom-developed program in C++ (MS
Visual Studio 2019, Redmond, WA). SNR was measured on magnitude images by
taking a ratio of the mean intensity in a region of interest (ROI) to the
scaled standard deviation (SD) in a noise-only background,13 i.e.,
SNR = MEAN*0.656/SD.RESULTS
The ultra-high
resolution UTE images at 7T for the studied subjects are shown in Figs. 1-5.
They demonstrated the potential to simultaneously visualize multiple functional
tissues in the knee joint: femoral and tibial cartilages (Fig. 1), patellar
cartilage (Fig. 2), menisci (Fig.3), patellar tendon (Fig. 4), anterior and
posterior cruciate ligaments (ACL and PCL, Fig. 5), and the chondro-osseous
junction within the femur, tibia, and patella (Figs. 1, 2). The measured SNR of
these tissues was between 22–34, which is high enough to visualize subtle
alterations in morphology of these tissues. SNR in menisci across the male and
female subjects is nearly unchanged (23.3 vs. 21.0), suggesting robustness and
repeatability of the technique.DISCUSSION
Ultra-high resolution
UTE imaging at 7T provided us with single scan for simultaneous visualization
of multiple functional components of the knee joint in humans. This advantage mainly benefited from a matched
combination of the AWSOS sequence, 7T magnet, and dedicated knee coil. Without
them, the power of ultra high resolution UTE technique would not be fully revealed.
The scan time (13min34sec) was acceptable as the studied subjects did not
report any complaints, and were able to keep the knee still during the scan. However,
SAR (specific absorption rate) was a major issue that led to a long TR (53ms)
when fat saturation was on, compared with a shorter TR (20ms, and thus a
shorter scan time 5min8sec) when fatsat was off.CONCLUSION
Ultra-high resolution UTE imaging at 7T has been
shown to have the capability to visualize structural details of critical
functional tissues in the knee joint of healthy subjects studied. It provides
us with a new non-invasive imaging tool critical to understanding the
mechanisms responsible for onset and progression of OA. More studies on
subjects and OA patients are needed to consolidate this potential advantage.Acknowledgements
This work was financially
supported by the General Research Fund of the Department of Radiology. This
work was also performed under the rubric of the Center for Advanced Imaging
Innovation and Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net), an NIBIB Biomedical Technology
Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183).References
1. Roemer
FW, Kwoh CK, Hannon MJ, Hunter DJ, Eckstein F, Fujii T, Boudreau RM, Guermazi
A. What comes first? Multitissue involvement leading to radiographic
osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging–based trajectory analysis over four
years in the Osteoarthritis Initiative. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY 2015, 67
(8): 2085–2096. DOI 10.1002/art.39176.
2. Chu CR, Williams AA, West RV, Qian Y, Fu FH, Do BH,
Bruno S. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging UTE-T2* Mapping of Cartilage
and Meniscus Healing After Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(8):1847-1856.
3. Buckwalter JA, Brown TD. Joint injury, repair, and
remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;
423:7-16.
4. Lohmander LS. Articular cartilage and osteoarthritis.
The role of molecular markers to monitor breakdown, repair and disease. J Anat
1994; 184: 477-492.
5. Chu
CR, Williams AA, Coyle CH, Bowers ME. Early diagnosis to enable early treatment
of pre-osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14(3):212.
6. Nelson
AE, Allen KD, Golightly YM, Goode AP, Jordan JM. A systematic review of
recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The
Chronic Osteoarthritis Management Initiative of the U.S. Bone and Joint
Initiative. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2014; 43:701–712.
7. Qian
Y, Williams AA, Chu CR, Boada FE. High-resolution ultrashort echo time (UTE)
imaging on human knee with AWSOS sequence at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;
35(1):204-210.
8. Garwood
MG, Idiyatullin DS, Corum CA, Moeller S. Frequency swept excitation for
magnetic resonance. US Patent 8,067,936. Nov. 29, 2011.
9. Bydder
M, Bydder GM, Robson M, Gatehouse P. Magnetic resonance imaging with ultra
short echo times. US Patent 7,474,097. Jan. 6, 2009.
10. Pauly
JM, Nishimura DG, Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 species. US patent
5025216, 1991.
11. Springer
E, Bohndorf K, Juras V, Szomolanyi P, Zbýň Š, Schreiner MM, Schmitt B, Trattnig
S. Comparison of routine knee magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T and 7 T. Invest
Radiol. 2017; 52(1):42-54.
12. Qian
Y, Boada FE. Acquisition-weighted stack of spirals for fast high-resolution 3D
UTE MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2008;
60:135-145.
13. Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in
SNR unit: a general method for SNR measurement. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2005; 54:1439-1447.