Junjiao Hu1, Weijun Situ1, and Huiting Zhang2
1Department of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China, 2MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Wuhan, China
Synopsis
This prospective study aimed to compare the image
quality of T1w-VIBE sequence using generalized autocalibrating partially
parallel acquisitions (GRPPA-VIBE) and controlled aliasing in parallel imaging
results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA-VIBE) and the spatial position consistency of CAIPIRINHA with/without non-rigid
3D-registration motion correction (MOCO) in liver MRI. The results showed that
the CAIPIRINHA had better image quality than the GRPPA with respect to respiratory
motion artifact suppression, liver edge sharpness and intrahepatic vascular
sharpness, and the spatial position consistency of the liver using CAIPIRINHA with
MOCO was significantly better than that of images without MOCO.
Introduction
Three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient recall echo volumetric
interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence is one of the most used
sequences in liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1,2]. However, the conventional
acceleration method, such as generalized autocalibrating partially parallel
acquisitions (GRAPPA) technique, still has long scanning time about 20s and cannot
meet the requirements of patients who have the problem of holding their breath[3]. The purpose of this
study is to compare the image quality of VIBE sequence using a new controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher
acceleration (CAIPIRINHA)
method and VIBE sequence using GRAPPA in liver, and to evaluate the effect of non-rigid 3D-registration motion correction (MOCO) combining with CAIPIRINHA on
liver spatial location registration.Methods and Materials
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our
hospital. A total number of 85 patients with liver MRI enhancement examination
in our hospital from March 2020 to August 2020 were recruited. All the patients signed the informed consent. Liver
MRI examinations of all patients were performed on a 3T MRI scanners (MAGNETOM
Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using 18-channel abdominal phase
array coil and 32-channel Tim spinal array coil. All patients underwent
pre-contrast GRAPPA-VIBE and CAIPIRINHA-VIBE breath-hold scan in the mask
phase, and then underwent CAIPIRINHA-VIBE breath-hold scan in arterial phase, portal
phase and delayed phase after administration. The parameters are listed in
Table 1. After the scanning of four phases of CAIPIRINHA-VIBE sequence
completed, 3D images without and with MOCO of each phase were automatically
generated. The images quality of GRAPPA-VIBE and CAIPIRINHA-VIBE in the mask
phase were scored subjectively by two physicians. The number of slices at the
top of the diaphragm in the arterial phase was taken as the base slice, and the
number of slices at corresponding position in the other stages subtracted with
the base slice. The range of diaphragm movement in each phase was counted by +
N/- N statistics.Results
The image quality and the scores of CAIPIRINHA-VIBE were
significantly higher than those of GRAPPA-VIBE regarding respiratory motion
artifact suppression, liver edge sharpness and intrahepatic vascular sharpness
(p < 0.05), as shown in Table 2 and Figure 1. The spatial position
consistency of the liver images using CAIPIRINHA-VIBE with MOCO was
significantly better than those without MOCO. In the mask phase, the number of
cases moving range of 0-2, 3-5 and more than 5 slices without and with MOCO
changed from 65 to 83, 15 to 2 and 5 to 0, respectively. All results are
summarized in Table 3, and representative images are showed in Figure 2.Discussion
The results showed that the image quality of CAIPIRINHA-VIBE
sequence was superior to conventional GRAPPA-VIBE in respiratory movement
artifacts, hepatic edge sharpness and intrahepatic vascular sharpness according
to the image quality and the subjective scores of two radiologists. One reason
maybe that CAIPIRINHA has shorter scan time and the patient can better
cooperate with the scanning in a short breath-hold. The other reason maybe that
CAIPIRINHA undersamples MRI data in the direction of both phase encoding and
frequency encoding, and modifies aliasing artifacts during volume scanning
through changing the sampling mode of phase encoding. The results were consistence with a previous
study [4]. The CAIPIRINHA-VIBE with MOCO had a better position consistency of
liver images than that without MOCO. This is because the liver moves in
different breath-holds and the liver morphology changes during dynamic
contrast-enhanced scan. The MOCO method
can correct these differences. After correcting the imaging in different
phases, the consistence and quantitative parameters would be improved.Conclusions
CAIPIRINHA-VIBE with MOCO can significantly improve image
quality by reducing motion artifacts, so that to ensure the high consistency of
spatial position of liver in different stages. In upper abdominal MRI
enhancement examination, it can be used instead of conventional GRAPPA-VIBE
sequence, especially in patients with poor breath-hold ability.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]Ba-Ssalamah A., Baroud S. & Bastati N. et al., "MR Imaging of Benign Focal Liver Lesions," Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, Vol.18, No.3(2010).
[2]Yu M. H., Lee J. M. & Yoon J. H. et al., "Clinical application of controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in a higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA)-volumetric interpolated breathhold (VIBE) sequence for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging," J Magn Reson Imaging, Vol.38, No.5(2013), pp.1020-1026.
[3]Shin P. Y., Hee L. C. & Seong K. I. et al., "Usefulness of controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging to clarify the hepatic arterial phase.," Investigative radiology, Vol.49, No.3(2014).
[4]Riffel P., Attenberger U. I. & Kannengiesser S. et al., "Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging.," Investigative radiology, Vol.48, No.7(2013).